HRSAdmin

When Leadership Talent Is Scarce: Key HR Strategies in a Tight Market

When Leadership Talent Is Scarce: Key HR Strategies in a Tight Market

By Eric Walczykowski, CEO, Bespoke Partners

Talent is a market like any other, with buyers and sellers.

Buyers are companies; sellers are prospective employees.

The law of supply and demand applies: when willing sellers are scarce, the market tightens, competition among buyers increases, and price (compensation) rises. That determines how easily you can find the talent you need at a compensation level that fits your budget.

So what do you do when the talent market gets tight?

A case study is playing out right now in private equity (PE). It offers lessons for HR leaders on finding the right executives when competition is fierce.

PE firms buy companies, improve them over a few years, and sell for a profit if all goes well.

The sector is huge. In the US, PE-backed companies directly employ about 13.3 million workers and support roughly 31–33 million jobs when you include supplier and consumer-spending effects. Nearly one in five US workers gets a paycheck linked to PE’s investments in our economy.

Leadership talent is essential to a profitable exit, so PE firms focus heavily on finding leaders who can execute growth and value-creation plans. Increasing scarcity of qualified leadership makes this much harder.

A bottleneck has developed because exits have been extremely low for an extended period. When an exit happens, senior executives typically become available for new assignments.

But US PE exits fell 25% in Q2 this year, according to PitchBook, amid economic uncertainty and tariff concerns. PitchBook analysts estimate PE firms hold an all-time-high inventory of more than 12,000 unsold US portfolio companies—a logjam caused by poor exit opportunities.

The exit problem means leadership churn isn’t happening. The most experienced executives are staying put, pursuing elusive exits, and are not available to lead the many companies now crowding PE portfolios.

The PE Leadership Bottleneck

As supply tightens, HR teams recruiting for PE face scarcity of qualified leadership.

It’s harder to find candidates with PE portfolio experience. Searches are longer and harder to close. When leaders are willing to consider new roles, compensation demands are much higher. Our latest data shows C-suite salary and bonus for software and SaaS executives is now consistently in the mid-$500,000 range—up about 25% for some roles over just a couple of years. That’s exactly what supply-and-demand dynamics predict: the “price” for a scarce resource rises.

Competition is fierce. Experienced leaders often field multiple offers simultaneously, especially seasoned CEOs and go-to-market executives in sales and marketing.

Fortunately, the same market rules suggest ways to mitigate tightness. Many of our clients use six recruiting strategies to ease constraints and improve their odds of hiring the leaders they need.

These apply well beyond the PE sector, and can be used by any HR professional hiring senior executives when those executives are scarce.

Impact on Leadership Recruiting

1) Make succession continuous, not episodic

Waiting until an immediate need arises locks you into that moment’s market conditions. Like all markets, the leadership market changes frequently. The most effective HR leaders run year-round succession programs that map and track potential needs and potential availability.

2) Expand the funnel with “step-ups”—and de-risk them

Hunting for C-suite “unicorns” with the exact resume narrows the pool and elongates searches. Consider VP-level “step-ups” who are ready for the C-suite. This can double or triple the candidate pool and reduce tight-market pressure. Our data shows step-ups achieve exits in PE-backed companies as often as seasoned C-suite counterparts as long as the new C-suite executives are vetted and supported properly with onboarding and mentorship or other support. The step-ups are hungry to prove themselves and will put in outsized effort.

3) Elevate HR as a strategic function

Traditional HR handles operations like payroll, benefits, and onboarding. But the most effective HR leaders elevate the function to be a true strategic partner. Because talent is mission-critical, HR and leadership needs belong in enterprise-level planning and decision-making. In PE, firms are adding full-time talent in operational advisory roles who help portfolio companies find and maximize impact from talent.

4) Get creative on compensation

As “market price” rises, recruiting qualified executives gets expensive. But talent isn’t a commodity with a single price. Use multiple levers—equity and options, milestone payouts, incentives tied to strategic success, and even remote work flexibility—to attract top leaders, sometimes at lower cash levels.

5) Streamline decision-making

When competition is intense, slow movers lose—both because candidates field other offers and because a slow process signals bureaucracy and a less-than-nimble culture. Top companies treat recruiting as a priority. Before engaging candidates, they align internally on the scorecard, references, compensation, interview cadence, and interview focus.

6) Work with external specialists

There’s a temptation to run searches in-house. But external search firms usually deliver better outcomes. They continually network with prospective candidates, giving you wider visibility. They track careers, know which roles will appeal and how to pitch them, and have real-time compensation data to guide negotiations and benchmark offers.

Six Strategies for a Tight Talent Market

Even in tight markets, some companies still land the best executives and set themselves up for success. The six strategies above are the tools they use to beat the competition for PE executive talent. You can apply them in any sector. The overarching strategy: run an efficient process, get creative, and broaden your market visibility to counteract scarcity of qualified talent.

Winning in the Tight Market

About Eric Walczykowski

Eric is the Chief Executive Officer of Bespoke Partners, a leading executive search firm for private equity portfolio companies.

Bespoke Partners delivers a scientific approach to search by leveraging proprietary tools and methodologies that lead to high impact executive teams that stay through the investment thesis 99% of the time.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Leading the Async Revolution: An HR Leader’s Guide to Cultural Transformation

Leading the Async Revolution

An HR Leader’s Guide to Cultural Transformation

By

Jim Coughlin

Founder at Remotivated

How forward-thinking HR professionals are spearheading the shift to asynchronous work cultures and why your organization can’t afford to wait

HR leaders are often the unsung heroes of workplace transformation. While executives debate strategy and managers focus on execution, we’re the ones tasked with the delicate art of cultural evolution. Today, one of the most critical transformations facing our profession is guiding organizations toward asynchronous-first cultures – and the window for competitive advantage is rapidly closing.

At Remotivated, we help organizations navigating this transition, and we’ve found that the most successful transformations aren’t driven by technology adoptions or policy mandates. Rather, they’re led by HR professionals who understand that async-first culture is fundamentally about reimagining how humans collaborate at their best.

The HR Leader's Dilemma: When "Always On" Becomes Always Wrong

Here’s a scenario that probably sounds familiar: Your CEO proudly announces the company’s commitment to “flexible work,” which sounds great on the surface. However, your employee engagement scores are plummeting. Exit interviews reveal exhaustion, not freedom. The culprit? A culture that treats remote work like in-office work.
The problem isn’t where people work – it’s how we’re asking them to work. Most organizations have a digitized synchronous culture rather than designing an asynchronous culture. The difference is profound, and as HR leaders, we’re uniquely positioned to recognize and address it.

Why HR Must Champion Asynchronous Culture (Not Just Remote Policies)

1. Employee Well-being at Scale

Traditional metrics focus on what we can easily measure: response times, meeting attendance, seat time logged. But asynchronous culture optimizes for what actually matters: meaningful contribution, cognitive load management, and sustainable performance. HR leaders who champion async-first approaches report significant improvements in employee satisfaction scores and a drastic reduction in burnout indicators.

2. Inclusive Excellence by Design

Asynchronous work isn’t just accommodating – it’s optimizing for human diversity. Parents managing school pickup, neurodivergent team members who process information differently, introverts who contribute better in writing – async culture doesn’t just include these voices, it amplifies them. This isn’t about making exceptions; it’s about designing systems that bring out everyone’s best work.

3. Talent Access Multiplier

When your culture operates asynchronously, geography becomes irrelevant. But more importantly, lifestyle becomes irrelevant. Suddenly, your talent pool includes incredible people who previously couldn’t fit into rigid synchronous expectations. The organizations that figure this out first will have unprecedented access to top talent.

The Implementation Framework: Beyond Policy Changes

Phase 1: Audit Your Synchronous Assumptions

Before changing tools, change thinking. Conduct an honest assessment of which collaborative activities truly require real-time interaction. Most HR leaders are shocked to discover that 60-70% of meetings could be handled asynchronously with better outcomes.
Start by tracking these metrics for 30 days:

  • Meeting frequency and duration per team
  • Response time expectations (stated vs. cultural reality)
  • Decision-making speed for different process types
  • Employee energy levels throughout typical work weeks

Phase 2: Design Communication Hierarchies

Create clear guidelines for when to use alternate communication methods. This isn’t about restricting communication – it’s about making it intentional. Establish protocols that default to asynchronous methods while preserving space for synchronous connections when it adds genuine value.

Phase 3: Train Managers as Culture Champions

Middle management makes or breaks async transformation. They need specific skills: writing clear context-full messages, managing performance based on outcomes rather than activity, and creating psychological safety for team members who contribute differently.

Measuring Success: New Metrics for New Culture

Traditional HR metrics weren’t designed for asynchronous culture. Consider measuring items like:

  • Contribution Quality Index: Are people delivering their best work, or just responding quickly?
  • Deep Work Protection Rate: How much uninterrupted focus time are team members actually getting?
  • Decision Velocity: How quickly do decisions happen (not how quickly meetings get scheduled)?
  • Cultural Alignment Score: Do employee behaviors match stated async values?

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

The “Async Theater” Trap: Organizations that adopt async tools but maintain synchronous expectations. This creates the worst of both worlds – more platforms to monitor without the benefits of thoughtful, time-shifted communication.

The Documentation Excuse: Teams that resist async communication because they “don’t have time to document.” This reveals a fundamental misunderstanding – async communication becomes your documentation.

The Equity Illusion: Assuming that making async communication available makes it equitable. Without intentional culture design, async tools often amplify existing communication hierarchies rather than disrupting them.

The Competitive Reality

Organizations that successfully implement asynchronous-first cultures aren’t just improving employee satisfaction – they’re fundamentally outcompeting synchronous organizations. They make decisions faster, access better talent, and scale more efficiently.

The question isn’t whether your organization will eventually adopt asynchronous practices. The question is whether you’ll lead this transformation or be forced into it by competitive pressure.

Your Next Steps as an HR Leader

  1. Assess Your Current State: How much of your organization’s collaboration actually requires real-time interaction?

  2. Build Internal Champions: Identify managers who already work well asynchronously and learn from their practices.

  3. Start Small, Think Big: Pilot async approaches with willing teams before organization-wide rollouts.

  4. Invest in Skills Development: Async culture requires new competencies, particularly in written communication and outcome-based performance management.

The future belongs to organizations that can harness human potential without constraining human rhythms. As HR leaders, we have the opportunity, and responsibility, to design remote cultures where everyone can do their best work, on their own terms, together.


Want to dive deeper into implementing asynchronous practices? Explore this
comprehensive guide to asynchronous work benefits for detailed strategies and tools that successful remote-first teams utilize to thrive.

Jim Coughlin is the Founder at Remotivated. Remotivated helps organizations build remote work cultures that actually work. Through their certification programs and consulting services, they help companies ensure sustainable, productive, and inclusive remote-first operations.

When I Was An Intern: What I Wish My Internship Company Knew

When I Was An Intern: What I Wish My Internship Company Knew

Internships are often painted as mere stepping stones—a brief chapter before “real” work begins.

But ask any former intern, and you’ll see: these months carry the power to shape careers, confidence, and sense of belonging.

Yet, what makes an internship truly transformative?

In this article, you’ll hear firsthand from voices who’ve lived it, sharing what they wish their companies understood: connection matters, growth needs support, and inclusion isn’t just a nice-to-have. It’s essential.

Their insights offer a blueprint for turning internships from ticking-off tasks into launching pads for potential.

Read on!

I wish more companies held structured opportunities for interns to build connections, whether that is with other interns, school alumni at the company, or higher-level employees, to create a community where everyone feels heard and a strong sense of belonging.

For me, team lunches have been very helpful. I always sat next to someone new every day, and by doing so, I was able to form authentic relationships as I learned about my peers’ interests outside of work. During my remote internships, in-person meetups where possible, typically in the bigger cities, and virtual office hours have offered me similar bonding experiences.

“Speed networking” during onboarding, where all the interns have the opportunity to quickly chat with others in the company, has been another game-changer. From day one, the ice was broken, and it was much easier to feel known and included in the company, much like my experience joining college clubs.

Having weekly guest speakers, especially former interns who have found career success, has also been deeply inspiring and a great addition to have in the program. It gave all the interns the chance to learn from now-experts once in their position and also a glance at the possibilities post-internship.

What truly elevated my intern experience were anonymous weekly feedback forms, a chance for interns to share what was and was not working well about the internship in terms of mentorship, culture, and workload. This way, it was evident to all the interns that the company valued and respected our opinions and inputs, and it was easy for them to make any adjustments to suit our needs, which I highly appreciated.

About Beverlyn Tsai

Beverlyn Tsai is a rising sophomore and a Presidential and Viterbi Scholar at the University of Southern California majoring in Computer Science and Business Administration with an AI Applications minor. She co-leads AthenaHacks, Southern California’s premier women-centric hackathon, supports corporate outreach for the Society of Women Engineers as an officer, and works as a Learning Assistant for an AI programming course. At USC Information Sciences Institute’s HUMANS Lab in the AI Department, Beverlyn leverages GPT-4o and OpenCV to detect AI images and identify superspreaders, and she applies web scraping, tweetNLP, and the Mann-Whitney U test to analyze emotional sentiment in AI versus non-AI political image tweets, research crucial to understand how AI-generated political media influences public opinion, trust, and election integrity.

I wish companies knew that moving to a new place for an internship, even just for the summer, can be scary! Programs and activities that help interns explore the area, meet friends close by, and get settled in their new city are essential. 

This is especially true for interns who are from communities that are smaller, far-away, or close knit. To support diverse engineers, it’s also to provide diverse kinds of support, including guidance on moving to a new place. 

About Madeline Gupta

Madeline Gupta is a recent graduate from Yale University where she studied how digital tools can increase community wellness around the globe. Her most recent projects are a virtual reality video game focused on land re-creation for her tribal nation, the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, and a statistical exploration into how large language models can contribute to Indigenous language education and preservation.This fall, she is starting as a software engineer at Google. She has worked as an intern at Zillow, Apple, and Kode with Klossy and her work has previously been featured by TEDx, NBC, and the United Nations.

Allow your interns to grow, but also allow them to fail sometimes. Mistakes aren’t signs of incompetence, but rather they’re signs that someone is learning, stretching, and doing something they haven’t done before. Especially for interns who are stepping into their first industry role, patience is key. They’re probably navigating a professional environment for the first time, and they’re most likely working on projects that are way more complex than anything they’ve done in school or on their own. Bumps in the road are normal as they’re part of the process. As an experienced employee, it’s your job to help them succeed, not expect them to have everything figured out from day one. 

When assigning projects, be realistic about scope and timeline. For instance, don’t give them a 6-month project and expect them to finish in 10 weeks; rather, give them something meaningful, but achievable. 

I’m currently mentoring an intern, and it reinforced how important mentorship really is for a successful experience. As a mentor, don’t only provide technical or career development or project guidance. Treat your intern like a full member of the team through checking in with them (e.g. 1:1 with your interns), making sure they’re adjusting okay. The gap between an academic environment and industrial environment is way more significant than most people acknowledge. 

Also, while school tends to put a lot of emphasis on technical skills, make space for soft skill development as well such as communication, teamwork, and navigating feedback. Many interns will be neurodivergent or don’t fit the usual mold of what’s considered “professional.” Thus, the way they navigate communication, teamwork, and receiving feedback may not fit the “norm” or “expectation.” Check in and figure out what actually helps them succeed. Not everyone thrives under the same expectations, and sometimes, leaning into a person’s strengths (even if they’re not conventional) is what unlocks their best work. 

Finally, don’t forget to encourage your interns to have a life outside of work, company lunches and happy hours. Encourage exploring the city, hanging out with friends, or even taking time for themselves. Many interns come straight from a hectic academic year, and may need time to decompress as well. Burnout is not just exclusive to full-time employees. Creating balance and reminding them that rest is part of success and achieving their best performance as possible makes the whole experience healthier and more sustainable as well.

About Angela Cao

Angela Cao is a Rewriting the Code (RTC) member based in Houston and a data scientist at Memorial Hermann Health Systems, where she leads high-impact AI and analytics projects to drive data-informed decisions in healthcare. She also holds a Masters of Data Science from Rice University and double Bachelor of Science degrees in Computer Science and Mathematics from the University of Texas at Austin. Angela is also a co-founder and board member of Women Who Do Data (W2D2) since its inception in 2024, where she leads initiatives to support and advance women and underrepresented minorities in Data and AI.

One valuable insight I’ve gained through my internship experiences is the importance of making expectations and workplace norms transparent and accessible to interns from day one. 

Often, much of what shapes the day-to-day culture, like communication styles, decision-making approaches, and unwritten “rules,” remains unspoken, which can create unnecessary confusion or hesitation for new team members.

I believe companies can improve their internship programs by documenting these key expectations in a clear, approachable guide or handbook tailored specifically for interns. This not only levels the playing field but also empowers interns to contribute confidently and feel truly integrated into the team.

Creating an environment where open dialogue is encouraged around these norms further supports learning and growth, helping interns navigate the nuances of professional culture while focusing on delivering impact.

Ultimately, a little clarity and intentional communication can turn an internship from just a learning opportunity into a truly enriching experience for everyone involved.

About Monica Para

Monica Para is a tech content creator and an early career member of Rewriting The Code. She is very passionate about diversity and sharing accessible resources in the tech and startup sectors. Her project, ChiMaps, is an AI-powered map that highlights startup and venture capital firms across the Chicago tech ecosystem. She aims to make tech more inclusive and navigable for all through content, community, and data-driven tools.

From my experience, the best internship programs are the ones where you’re trusted with meaningful work, not just small tasks to pass the time. 

Having a mentor or someone to check in with regularly made me feel supported and helped me learn so much faster. 

I also really valued when companies gave interns the chance to meet people from other teams. This opened my eyes to roles and paths I hadn’t considered. 

Feeling included and knowing my input mattered, even as an intern, made a huge difference in my confidence and internship experience. 

Companies should focus on creating an inclusive and welcoming environment for their interns.

About Chahana Dahal

Chahana Dahal is a Computer Science graduate with a Data Science minor from Westminster University, where she completed her degree in just three years. She was selected for the Google Computer Science Research Mentorship Program (CSRMP), which started her research journey in AI/ML. Her work on knowledge graph completion with RelatE is under review for NeurIPS 2025, and she is currently developing a Federated RAG framework using large language models. She also presented her independently proposed AI-powered education framework at AAAI 2024 and previously served as a Machine Learning Engineer at Omdena, contributing to adaptive AI tutors for refugee education. She plans to begin her graduate degree in ML in fall 2025.

What Legacy Does Your Company’s Internship Experience Aim to Build?

If there’s one thread weaving these stories together, it’s this: internships aren’t just about what’s learned; they’re about what’s felt.

Structure, trust, honest feedback, and meaningful connection are the pillars that turn a temporary opportunity into a lasting impact.

As companies look to shape their next wave of talent, listening to these voices won’t just improve internship programs; it will help build workplaces where everyone, intern or executive, truly belongs.

The future of work is crafted bell by bell, lunch by lunch, check-in by check-in.

What will your legacy be for the next intern who walks through your door?

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Decoding Vague Feedback: What Recruiters Really Mean When They Say “Not the Right Fit”

Decoding Vague Feedback

What Recruiters Really Mean When They Say “Not the Right Fit”

By

Margaret Buj

Global Talent Acquisition Leader and Interview Coach

You nailed the interviews (or so you thought). The conversations flowed, you came prepared, and you left with a good feeling. Then the email arrives:

“Thanks for your time – you were a strong candidate, but we’ve decided to move forward with someone else who’s a better fit.”

Frustrating, right?

As a recruiter and interview coach with two decades of experience, I’ve seen this scenario unfold hundreds of times. Candidates are left in the dark, wondering:

What does “not the right fit” actually mean?

And more importantly – what can I do differently next time?

The truth is, “fit” is often a polite umbrella term we use to mask a more specific reason the candidate wasn’t selected. Sometimes it’s about skills. Sometimes it’s about communication or chemistry. And sometimes, it’s not about you at all – it’s about internal dynamics, team balance, or shifting hiring priorities.

Let’s decode the most common vague rejection phrases and what they might actually mean behind the scenes – along with what you can take away from each.

1. “We’re moving forward with someone who’s a stronger fit.”

👉 Translation: They likely found a candidate with more relevant experience or clearer alignment to the role’s core responsibilities.

🔍 What to reflect on:

  • Were your examples directly tied to the role’s key deliverables?
  • Could your resume or interview answers have done a better job positioning your impact in similar roles or industries?

What to do next:

  • Make sure your resume and LinkedIn profile clearly demonstrate measurable achievements aligned with the target job.
  • In interviews, use the STAR method to connect your experience directly to the challenges the hiring manager is facing.

2. “We’ve decided to go in a different direction.”

👉 Translation: This could mean a change in role scope, budget constraints, or that they decided to prioritize a different skill set entirely.

🔍 What to reflect on:

  • Did the job or expectations shift during the process?
  • Were there hints the company was rethinking what they needed?

What to do next:

  • Don’t take this one personally – it often has nothing to do with your performance.
  • Follow up politely asking if they see a potential future fit for your background in the company.

3. “We really enjoyed meeting you, but the team didn’t feel it was quite the right match.”

👉 Translation: This may signal a perceived mismatch in communication style, seniority level, or team dynamics.

🔍 What to reflect on:

  • Did you ask questions and engage with multiple stakeholders during the interview?
  • Were there moments you could have connected better to company culture or values?

What to do next:

  • Watch for cultural cues in interviews – do they value brevity? Collaboration? Bold ideas? Mirror what you observe authentically.
  • Consider asking in future interviews: “What does success look like in this team, beyond the technical skills?”

4. “We were impressed but decided to proceed with someone whose experience more closely aligned.”

👉 Translation: You may have been slightly overqualified, underqualified, or just came from a different industry or environment.

🔍 What to reflect on:

  • Did you bridge the gap between your past experience and the specific demands of the role?
  • Were you able to show how your past roles prepared you to succeed here?

What to do next:

  • Customize your pitch and resume to emphasize relevant experience.
  • In interviews, be proactive in addressing the “leap” – show you understand the business and how you’ll add value from day one.

5. “It was a tough decision - we had a lot of great candidates.”

👉 Translation: This might be true! But it can also mean someone else had a slight edge in experience, executive presence, or internal advocacy.

🔍 What to reflect on:

  • Did you make your value obvious and memorable?
  • Did you build rapport with the interviewers or leave them with a clear sense of what it’d be like to work with you?

What to do next:

  • Ask for feedback — not everyone will give it, but it’s worth asking.
  • Stay connected. I’ve seen many candidates re-interviewed and hired later, especially when they followed up graciously.

Summary: It’s Not Always You

Hiring isn’t a perfect science. Sometimes the internal candidate got the job. Sometimes the role was paused. And sometimes, you were genuinely excellent – but someone else was a slightly better puzzle piece.

When you hear “not the right fit,” take a breath. Then take action: reflect, refine your approach, and stay open. Clarity is power – and with the right tools and insight, your next opportunity will be an even better fit for you.

Margaret Buj is a Global Talent Acquisition Leader and Interview Coach with two decades of experience hiring top talent across EMEA, LATAM, and the US. She has led hiring across engineering, product, marketing, and G&A at companies including Expedia, VMware, Cisco, Microsoft, Box, Typeform, and Mixmax.

Margaret is also a Career Success Manager at Kadima Careers and the founder of Interview Coach UK, where she’s coached over 1,000 professionals on landing jobs, negotiating salaries, and advancing their careers. Her insights have been featured in Forbes, Business Insider, Fox Business, and Financial Times, and she has been recognised as a LinkedIn Top Voice.

She offers 1:1 coaching, group programs, and interview training for hiring managers. Learn more at interview-coach.co.uk or connect with her on LinkedIn.

Gen Z Is Doing Things Differently. That’s a Good Thing.

Gen Z Is Doing Things Differently. That’s a Good Thing.

By

Kirk Offel

CEO of Overwatch Mission Critical

Gen Z is the first generation that doesn’t trust the promise of college, doesn’t blindly adopt the latest tech, and doesn’t vote the way we expect them to. And that might be the most hopeful thing about them.

Gen Z is Rejecting the Smartphone Life

The negative impacts of smartphones and social media on mental health are well-documented, and Gen Z understands this better than any other. As the first true digital natives, they grew up surrounded by screens–and now, they’re rejecting them.  

A new survey from Pew Research finds that 48% of teens say that social media has a “mostly negative” effect on people their age, up from 32% just two years ago. A separate Harris Poll survey found that nearly half of Zoomers wish TikTok, Snapchat, and X had never been invented. A full 83% say they’ve taken steps to limit social media use by unfollowing accounts, deleting apps, or disabling notifications. 

Unlike previous generations who embraced new tech uncritically, Gen Z is taking a ‘Goldilocks approach’– not too much, not too little, but just right.

The Political Shift No One Saw Coming

For decades, Democrats have relied on younger voters as a core base of support. But those days appear to be changing. 

In the 2024 election, President Trump lost voters under 30 by only four points, and won young men by 14 points – a dramatic shift from 2020. A Harvard Youth Poll found that 18-24-year-olds identified as more conservative than 25-29-year-olds, a rare reversal in American politics.

Gen Z isn’t following the same political scripts–and that’s reshaping the national conversation.

College Isn’t the Default Anymore

For my generation, Generation X, the path to success ran through a four-year college or military service. But for many, that path ended in debt, disillusionment, and a corporate job that felt more draining than fulfilling. I chose the military, which gave me a mission-focused mindset that led me straight to the technology industry. Gen Z has taken notice. 

Military recruitment is at a 20-year high, breaking recruiting records. Gen Z is exploring alternative career paths–especially in the data center industry, where future-proof, high-paying roles are within reach without a traditional degree. One-in-four students today will graduate with a degree that’s obsolete within two years. In contrast, data centers offer certifications that prepare graduates in six months and help them stay current with rapidly evolving technologies.

Why Data Centers Appeal to Gen Z

With a projected global shortfall of 500,000 qualified data center professionals in the next five years, companies are waking up to the reality that Gen. Z may be the solution they didn’t expect–but desperately need.

This career path offers three key things Gen. Z is looking for:

  1. Six-figure income potential without a costly college degree.
  2. Grit-driven training programs that reward intelligence and perseverance.
  3. Purpose jobs that truly matter to the future of our digital economy.

These young people are not looking for handouts. They want meaningful opportunities to contribute and succeed.

A Generation Poised to Lead

Gen Z is pragmatic, skeptical of old systems, and hungry for purpose. If we meet them where they are–on their terms by offering high-paying, future-proof jobs in fields like digital infrastructure, we might just help them build the kind of future every generation before them only dreamed of. In doing so, they have a real chance to restore what America has lost in recent decades: a strong and vibrant middle class built on work that matters.

Kirk Offel stands at the forefront of the Mission Critical and Data Center industries as the CEO of OVERWATCH Mission Critical. His company offers a unique combination of traditional Strategic Data Center Consulting and innovative full-service, Owner Representation professional services, catering to the Mission Critical and Telecom Industries. Kirk’s journey in this field began in 1995 with his service in the US Navy on the Nuclear Fast Attack Submarine SSN-691, laying the foundation for over two decades of substantial contributions to the industry.

Throughout his career, Kirk has assumed key executive roles in several prestigious organizations, including Medtronic, Active Power, Eaton Corporation, Hewlett-Packard’s Technology Services Consulting practice (EYP), CyrusOne Data Centers, NOVA Mission Critical, and Aligned Data Centers. His diverse experience has enabled him to lead initiatives and drive innovation within these companies.

In addition to his executive pursuits, Kirk is the founder of the Data Center Austin Conference (DC/AC), currently ranked #2 out of all data center industry conferences. This technical summit is dedicated to promoting discovery and collaboration among data center professionals, focusing on addressing the challenges of future capacity needs. This initiative underscores his commitment to fostering community and knowledge sharing in the industry.

What Tech Hiring Teaches Us About Talent: Lessons from SaaS, Startups, and Scale-Ups

July 09, 2025

What Tech Hiring Teaches Us About Talent: Lessons from SaaS, Startups, and Scale-Ups

By Margaret Buj
Global Talent Acquisition Leader and Interview Coach

After two decades of recruiting for tech companies – from high-growth SaaS startups to global players like VMware or Expedia – I’ve seen what makes hiring succeed… and what quietly sabotages it.

Tech hiring moves fast. Roles evolve rapidly, products shift direction, and org structures get rebuilt overnight. But one thing stays consistent: the best teams are built by people who know how to hire not just for skills, but for adaptability, ownership, and clarity of thought.

Here’s what I’ve learned from working at the heart of tech talent acquisition – and what HR leaders in any industry can take from it.

In the world of B2B SaaS, the tech stack you hire for today might be obsolete in 12 months. That’s why the best hiring teams don’t just ask “Have you used this tool?” – they ask “How do you learn?”

I’ve seen too many companies reject strong candidates because they didn’t tick one specific box. But the reality is, a candidate who’s curious, resourceful, and fast to onboard often outperforms someone who meets every requirement on paper but stagnates quickly.

What to do differently: Train interviewers to assess for learning agility, not just tool familiarity. Use scenarios to test how candidates adapt, solve problems, and navigate ambiguity.

Tech companies often scale in waves – hiring dozens of people across product, engineering, and marketing in short bursts. The pressure is high, and it’s tempting to “just get someone in.” But ad hoc hiring creates messy teams, overlapping roles, and unclear accountability. At Mixmax, where I lead global hiring for engineering, product, and marketing, we’ve had the most success when we combine speed with structure:
  • Interview plans are aligned across roles
  • Each stage has a clear purpose
  • Feedback loops are tight
  • We move fast – but not blindly 
What to do differently: Even in high-growth mode, build clarity into your process. Define role outcomes, not just responsibilities. Align hiring panels early. This creates better candidate experience and long-term team cohesion.
In startups, there’s often an unconscious bias toward extroverted, high-energy candidates who “own the room.” But some of the strongest hires I’ve seen are thoughtful, quiet problem-solvers who deliver impact with minimal noise. For example, I once hired a Staff Engineer who wasn’t flashy in interviews – but his clarity, ownership, and cross-functional influence transformed an entire delivery stream. You wouldn’t have known it from the first call. What to do differently: Help interviewers evaluate thinking quality, not just charisma. Use structured interviews, scoring rubrics, and diverse panel representation to reduce bias toward style over substance.

I’ve recruited for some of the most in-demand tech roles – including growth marketing, product design, and PMs. These roles are hard to evaluate if you only look at keywords.

A great growth marketer doesn’t just “run campaigns” – they tie user acquisition to product loops, optimize journeys with data, and partner with product, design, and sales. That nuance often gets lost in a CV.

What to do differently: Go deeper in interviews. Ask candidates to walk you through a strategy from hypothesis to execution. Have them share learnings from failed experiments. This uncovers critical thinking, cross-functional maturity, and whether they actually drove outcomes or just supported them.

Global, remote hiring opened doors – but it also exposed a lot of bad habits. I’ve seen companies over-index on async tools and under-invest in candidate experience. Long, drawn-out processes. No updates. Generic assessments.

Meanwhile, the best candidates – the ones who are still getting multiple offers — expect clarity, speed, and a sense of connection.

What to do differently: Even remotely, make hiring feel human. Communicate regularly. Set expectations. Tailor the process to the role. Remote shouldn’t mean distant – it should mean intentional.

Hiring isn’t just about filling seats – it’s often the first real experience a candidate has with your brand. If your process is inconsistent, disorganised, or overly transactional, that’s how your company is perceived – no matter what your careers page says. The companies that get hiring right often get other things right too:
  • Decision-making is clear
  • Accountability is shared
  • Communication is intentional
  • Feedback loops exist
What to do differently: Treat hiring as a product. Ask: Is this designed well? Is it tested? Do we iterate based on feedback? The answers usually tell you how well your team is operating – not just how you hire.

In the early days of SaaS hiring, talent was often seen as a reactive function – post a job, fill a seat. That’s no longer viable.

Today, the best HR and recruiting leaders act as strategic partners:

  • Advising on role design
  • Helping managers interview effectively
  • Challenging vague requirements
  • Improving cross-functional alignment
  • And making hiring a core part of how the business scales

Great hiring isn’t about copying what worked last year – it’s about adapting fast, hiring intentionally, and making every headcount decision count.

About the Author

Margaret Buj is a Global Talent Acquisition Leader and Interview Coach with two decades of experience recruiting top talent across EMEA, LATAM, and the US. She has led hiring for global tech companies, scale-ups, and high-growth SaaS startups – including Microsoft, VMware, Cisco, Box, Typeform, and Mixmax.

Margaret currently leads hiring at Mixmax and coaches professionals worldwide through her practice and Kadima Careers. Her advice has been featured in Forbes, Business Insider, and Financial Times. She specialises in hiring across engineering, product, and marketing – and helping companies build inclusive, high-performing teams.