Menu

candidates

Beyond the “No”: Communicating with Rejected Candidates

by

Beyond the "No": Communicating with Rejected Candidates

Steven Mostyn
Chief Human Resource Officer, Management.org

In our organization, we believe in communicating with all applicants, even those who are rejected. We send a personalized email to each rejected candidate, thanking them for their interest and informing them of our decision.

This approach is rooted in our commitment to maintaining a positive employer brand and treating every candidate with respect.

There are clear advantages to this practice. By providing closure, we help applicants move forward in their job search without uncertainty.

Additionally, candidates who receive a thoughtful rejection often view the company more favorably, which can lead to positive word-of-mouth or future applications.

We’ve found that even rejected candidates may reapply for different roles down the line, having had a respectful and transparent experience.

Skipping this step could damage our employer brand and leave potential future talent with a negative impression.

Marin Cristian-Ovidiu
CEO, Online Games

As the CEO of Online Games, I ensure that we always inform candidates when their job application is rejected.

Although we’re a small team and handle hiring ourselves, we believe in maintaining professionalism and treating applicants with respect. Communicating rejections not only provides closure but also leaves a positive impression of our company, which is crucial in the competitive gaming industry.

This practice has resulted in some candidates expressing appreciation for our transparency, and they’ve even recommended our games or applied for other positions later.

Ignoring applicants, on the other hand, would harm our brand’s reputation and diminish our ability to attract talent in the future.

Ryan Farley
CEO of LawnStarter

I do tend to see a quick follow up informing an applicant of a rejection as the courteous thing to do, so I’ve always made this policy.

However, I tend to make more of a point if I’m rejecting someone after a first interview. It’s less of a priority for people who have only applied, since I think it’s pretty common for no response to be taken as a rejection in those cases.

But, if someone’s put in the time and effort to prepare for an interview, I do think it’s kind and respectful to let them know if they’re no longer being considered.

Andre Kazimierski
CEO, Improovy

Personally I don’t see it being very necessary to send a rejection for every application I put on the “no” pile. For any given position I can receive tens of applications, and I’ll pick just a couple or a few applicants to actually bring in for an interview.

Of course I’ll always send a rejection after an interview, but for someone who’s just turned in an application and resume, I’m not sure it’s necessary.

Shenella Karunaratne
Director of Operations, Online MFT Programs

I do think it’s nice to communicate rejections to applicants.

From what I have found, it can improve the overall impression of your company if you have the respect for someone’s time to send even a simple form rejection.

Otherwise, candidates can experience some stress from waiting to hear, especially if it’s a position they’re excited about.

David Weisselberger
Founding Partner, Erase The Case

We prioritize empathy and respect in our employment process, particularly when dealing with rejected job applications.

Our HR team takes a personalized approach, ensuring that each applicant receives prompt and constructive feedback. We feel that skipping this stage would damage the trust and dignity of people who spent time and effort applying.

Instead, our experienced HR representatives provide thoughtful rejection emails or phone conversations that include detailed reasons for the choice as well as helpful ideas for future growth.

This approach reflects our respect for their interest and commitment to assisting individuals in overcoming adversities, which is a core value mirrored in our objective to clear criminal records.

This ensures a great applicant experience and helps us keep our reputation as sensitive advocates.

Adam Chahl
Founder, Vancouver Home Search

At Vancouver Home Search, we believe in maintaining transparency and respect throughout the hiring process. For me, it’s important to treat applicants the way we’d want to be treated.

So, yes, our HR team does inform rejected applicants. While it’s not always easy to send rejection emails, we do it because it’s a reflection of our company’s values—clear communication and professionalism.

In my experience, informing candidates of a decision builds goodwill and leaves the door open for future opportunities. It also strengthens our brand by showing respect for the time applicants invested.

Sure, it takes some effort, but it’s well worth it. Skipping this step just isn’t in line with how I believe businesses should operate, every interaction counts.

Andrei Kurtuy
CCO & Co-Founder, Novorésumé

At Novorésumé, we prioritize informing all rejected applicants, and here’s why: we see it as an opportunity to build long-term relationships.

Sending a thoughtful rejection email is not just about good manners—it’s a strategic investment in our employer brand. It shows respect for the candidate’s time and effort, which fosters goodwill and leaves the door open for future opportunities.

In a competitive talent market, how you handle rejection can be the difference between someone leaving with a positive view of your company or feeling disregarded.

Many of our applicants have returned to apply for different roles because they appreciate the transparent and respectful rejection process. Some have even referred others to us, boosting our talent pipeline.

Communicating rejections humanizes the hiring process, reminding candidates that, while they weren’t the right fit this time, their efforts are recognized and valued.

Counterview

Carla Niña Pornelos
General Manager, Wardnasse

We believe transparency is key to building a strong reputation. Here’s the truth: we don’t inform rejected applicants.

Why? We don’t believe in softening the truth. If someone doesn’t hear back from us— it means they didn’t make it. In the real world, no one hands out rejection notices, and we want people to be ready for that. It’s a tough reality— but one we think is needed in today’s fast-paced world.

Letting someone know they’ve been turned down just makes them wait for the next chance instead of pushing themselves to get better.

At Wardnasse, we expect applicants to seek feedback and grow, not wait for someone to spell it out. This approach has made us stronger—and we think it’s time more companies followed suit.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing their insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Closing the Loop: The Importance of Communicating with All Candidates

by

Closing the Loop: The Importance of Communicating with All Candidates

Ben Sporn
CEO, Joy Wallet

Considering we care about our reputation and we’re always trying to build it up — we inform rejected applicants.

While I completely understand how long and complex the hiring process is and how sometimes it’s easy(er) to overlook this final step, letting applicants know where they stand shows professionalism.

The idea behind this prolonged hiring cycle is that some candidates might not be perfect for the current open role, but they might be for a future one.

So, we don’t burn bridges; instead, we take some time to show respect and ensure our company leaves a positive impression (even when the outcome is not positive at the moment).

I’ve found that applicants appreciate transparency, even if the news isn’t what they hoped for.

They remember how they were treated and are more likely to refer others to the company or apply for future openings.

Ignoring this step may seem like saving time, but in reality, it could mean losing out on talented individuals who would have considered us again later.

Rafi Friedman
President, Coastal Luxury Outdoors

The short answer here is yes.

Anyone who submits a complete application to us is at least going to get a simple rejection email if we turn them down.

The further a candidate gets in the hiring process, the more detail and personal effort we’ll put into this communication.

If someone makes it to the in-person interview stage, especially if they interview well, I’ll usually take the time to call them personally, thank them for applying, and give them some feedback on what went wrong or why they weren’t a good fit.

I see this as a simple way of being polite, as well as a smart move to encourage these applicants to try again in the future.

Jordan Anthony
Certified Nutritionist, Ahara

Job hunting is a challenging, uncertain process. It takes enough mental and emotional labor without being left wondering whether you’re ever going to get hired by this or that employer. It’s also incredibly easy for us to send quick, polite rejection emails to anyone we don’t end up hiring.

So to answer your question, yes, we do inform candidates when we reject them. We don’t always go into detail, especially for openings where we had a lot of applicants, but we always take the time to let someone know that they haven’t made the cut so that they can move on.

Carolina Kazimierski
Co-Owner & President, Sophia’s Cleaning Service

This can vary a bit for me.

My general preference is to let all rejected applicants know, and I’ll just use a generic but heartfelt form message.

However, if I have tons of applicants for a role, sometimes it just isn’t possible and I’ll stick to sending more personalized rejections to candidates I’ve actually interviewed and then decided to reject.

I think overall it’s nice to inform people where you can, but in this day and age I don’t think everyone expects a rejection from every business they submit an application to.

Eliot Vancil
CEO, Fuel Logic LLC

We want to ensure candidates have a good experience. We think that letting applicants know they didn’t get the job is a business courtesy and a great chance to get feedback.

We value their time and effort by letting people know they don’t have the job they want but still need. This method also gives us useful feedback on hiring people and finding ways to improve. Our image with job seekers has improved since we started using it, and some of them have even come back to apply for future jobs.

We know that not all companies tell applicants they didn’t get the job, but we think the pros and cons outweigh the cons. By emphasizing a good candidate experience, we’ve built a strong employer brand and drawn top talent to our company.

Nick Valentino
VP of Market Operations, Bellhop Charlotte Movers

We view communicating rejection as primarily a matter of simple politeness.

We know that job hunting is an uncertain, time-consuming, often demoralizing process, and we want to do as much as we can to make it easier on people.

One area where we do see a direct benefit from communicating rejections is with candidates who didn’t quite make the cut after the final round of interviews.

These are usually people we would gladly hire; we just liked another candidate better.

This means that they can be great leads for future openings, and by communicating well with them throughout the hiring process, we can build the foundation of a useful relationship for the future.

Julia Lozanov
Chief Editor, Verpex

Experience of the candidate is our first priority at Verpex, even for applications that are denied. Every applicant will receive individualized feedback from our HR department, either by phone or email, along with helpful insights and the rationale behind the decision.

We just introduced a novel procedure called “Candidate Care Packages.” Among these digital bundles are:

  • Resources for enhancing one’s abilities
  • Trends and ideas from the industry invitations
  • Upcoming job opportunities .

This strategy, in our opinion, shows how much we value their time and attention. It also demonstrates our dedication to fostering professional development.

By doing this, we uphold our brand’s favorable reputation and cultivate a talent pool for upcoming chances.

Verpex’s reputation as a sympathetic and encouraging employer has been strengthened by this approach, which has led to an increase in good ratings on job boards and social media.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing their insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Candidate Rejection: An Opportunity to Build Relationships, Not Burn Bridges

by

Candidate Rejection: An Opportunity to Build Relationships, Not Burn Bridges

Daniel Meursing
CEO/Founder, Premier Staff

At Premier Staff, we’ve implemented a unique feedback system for all job applicants, setting a new standard in the event staffing industry. We believe in transparency and respect for every individual who shows interest in joining our team.

Our AI-assisted platform provides personalized feedback to every applicant, highlighting their strengths and areas for growth. This approach has yielded remarkable results.

We’ve seen a 90% increase in positive candidate feedback, with many unsuccessful applicants reapplying after enhancing their skills based on our suggestions.

This strategy has significantly boosted our employer brand. We’ve experienced a 75% increase in high-quality applications and a 60% rise in referrals from previous candidates.

One applicant shared, “Even though I didn’t get the job, Premier Staff’s feedback was invaluable. It showed they valued my time and effort. I’m more determined than ever to work for them in the future.”

By treating every applicant with respect and providing constructive feedback, we’ve created a positive ecosystem that benefits both our company and the broader event staffing community.

Pramod Bhat
CEO, Stallion Express

At Stallion Express, we ensure that every rejected applicant receives a personalized response from our HR team. We believe in transparency and respect. Candidates invest time and effort into the application process, and we must acknowledge that.

We have observed distinct benefits when rejections are communicated. It first upholds a favorable employer brand. A lot of candidates have expressed thanks for knowing where they stand, and they value the criticism. As evidence that a polite rejection can lead to a future opportunity, 20% of rejected candidates have gone on to apply for other positions.

It also has to do with reputation. In the competitive marketplace of eCommerce, the recommendations spread quickly. Taking good care of applicants aids in luring top talent. When it is able, our HR team provides constructive comments in addition to applying a deliberate and consistent rejection process.

Although skipping this step could save time in the short run, we think building trust and long-term connections is worth the work.

Anna Williams
HR Director, Pretty Moment

In my role as an HR Director at Pretty Moment, we value every effort made by job applicants. We ensure every candidate who does not match our current needs is respectfully informed.

This communication is vital as it displays our organization’s integrity, and we have realized it garners us respect from the professional community.

Notifying applicants also gives them closure preventing anxiety and the related productivity loss, which could result if they were left in the dark.

Moreover, a polite rejection upholds the candidates’ confidence and realigns their career search efforts.

On another level, our approach might convert today’s rejected candidate into tomorrow’s ideal fit, as they may reapply when more suitable vacancies emerge. They could even become a valued customer or brand advocate, given the positive rejection experience.

Lily Wang
HR Director, Srlon

As the HR Director at Taizhou Srlon Food Container Technology Co.,Ltd, I can assure you that we prioritize the treatment of all job applicants with utmost respect and professionalism.

This includes those we unfortunately have to turn down. We believe in communicating rejections, primarily to ensure closure for the applicants. It also helps the candidates to move on with their job search and clearly understand they should look for other opportunities.

Additionally, this practice promotes our reputation as a respectful and transparent company that cares not just for its employees, but for every individual who aspires to be one.

Although this can be a difficult task, it strengthens our entity’s credibility and relationships in the professional world. After all, today’s rejected applicant may turn out to be tomorrow’s ideal candidate or business partner.

Sam Tarantino
Fractional CMO, Harmonic Reach

As the founder of a Fractional CMO service, I have experience informing both successful and rejected job candidates. We believe in transparency and courtesy, so we notify all applicants of the outcome.

For rejected candidates, we provide constructive feedback and relevant details about why they weren’t selected. This helps them improve for future opportunities and shows them respect. It also strengthens our brand, as even rejected candidates gain a positive impression of our hiring process.

When hiring for clients, we find that communicating rejections yields advantages like a more qualified candidate pool. Candidates see that we value their time and effort, so higher-quality applicants tend to engage with us. They also spread word of their good experience, which attracts additional strong candidates through word-of-mouth.

Some companies avoid rejections due to time constraints or fear of legal issues. However, with the right approach, the benefits of professional, caring communication far outweigh the costs. For example, we’ve streamlined our process so that providing feedback adds only a few minutes per candidate. We also have a disclaimer clarifying that feedback isn’t a promise of future consideration.

Hiren Shah
Founder, Anstrex

At our organization, we have made it a practice to communicate with the applicants regarding their job application rejections regardless of the fact that it is not common in the industry.

Why? As for balancing the relationships and nurturing a positive brand equity in the long run.

Feedback from candidates always makes a positive impact in some instances, even if they failed to get a particular job. A lot of candidates have come back to now seek different positions after some time simply because of how we treated them.

It is a measure aimed at encouraging finding of goodwill which is usually not given attention in the busy processes of recruitment.

Leaving out this strategy can create states of depression in candidates who have applied which can harm your company in many ways in the future. Plus it is also about defining a culture that encourages you to be transparent and accountable.

Advising the applicants not only closes the loop, it opens new avenues for future collaborations.

Michael Collins
Owner, Sphere IT

In my capacity as the CEO of Sphere IT, Michael Collins, I have constantly stressed that how people manage job applications is a reflection of how an organization operates.

At Sphere IT, there is a policy that every applicant including the ones who are turned down by the company is advised on their application status.

Such approaches go beyond professional ethics; rather, they pertain to courtesy, honesty and lifetime engagement.

In this regard, one specific advantage that we’ve observed is that quite a number of candidates, even after losing the job, still support the company’s name and tell others how good working with the Company is.

This has resulted in some referrals and new partnerships which we had not expected.

They also inform the applicants, which makes it unnecessary for applicants to follow up with calls, which is a time-waster for our HR and improves overall productivity.

The other opportunity is to create an applicant built for the institute who shall be there for future jobs. Today’s candidates might not be the best match for the job but would be for a position available in the next few years. By being nice, there is always a chance for them to apply again.

Otherwise, not doing this can adversely affect the perception of your company and cause you to miss possible horizons for development.

In the final analysis, there is nothing bad in how we inform people about the rejection because it enhances our image and helps build very good relationships— and this is something that has been beneficial to us over the years.

Samuel Davity
CEO, Urban Tufting

In our organization, we believe that every applicant deserves respect and closure, so we make it a priority to inform every rejected candidate.

It’s about recognizing the effort they’ve put into the application and interview process.

By sending personalized rejection emails, we acknowledge their time and provide a brief, but genuine, reason for the decision. This practice fosters goodwill, strengthens our employer brand, and leaves the door open for future opportunities.

We’ve noticed that rejected applicants often express gratitude for the transparency, and some even reapply for roles better suited to their skills.

It’s not just about filling positions; it’s about building relationships and creating a positive candidate experience, no matter the outcome.

In a world driven by connection, even a “no” can open doors for the future.

Steven A. Templeton
CEO, PracticePro 365

At PracticePro 365, we believe in treating every applicant with respect and professionalism.

That’s why we make it a point to inform all candidates, regardless of the outcome. When we reject an application, we send a personalized communication explaining that we’ve moved forward with other candidates.

It helps support brand image and makes the applicants appreciated regardless of whether they are hired or not.

We’ve experienced that this strategy fosters goodwill. A lot of candidates appreciate this kind of openness, and this is good for us in the long term.

What’s more, it ensures our reputation in the industry is positively retained and eliminates the perception that we are a time and effort-wasting organization.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing their insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Turning Down Candidates Without Turning Them Off: The Power of Communication

by

Turning Down Candidates Without Turning Them Off: The Power of Communication

Justin Godur
CEO & Founder, Capital Max

We inform rejected candidates because it aligns with our core values of transparency and fairness.

I know firsthand that applying for a job takes time and effort, and it’s only right that we acknowledge this by providing a respectful and timely response, even when the outcome isn’t favorable.

This practice has yielded several benefits for us.

Firstly, it strengthens our brand’s reputation—candidates, even those rejected, appreciate the communication and often speak positively about the experience.

Secondly, it fosters trust. In industries where word-of-mouth and online reviews matter, we’ve seen the long-term advantages of keeping lines of communication open.

Lastly, rejected applicants sometimes reapply for future roles, better aligned with their skills, resulting in valuable hires.

We don’t skip this step because a simple, thoughtful response creates a positive ripple effect in the talent pool, helping us maintain strong relationships with potential future employees.

Mafe Aclado
General Manager, Coupon Snake

Truth is, communicating rejection isn’t fun, but one of the reasons we always find the time to do this, is because we believe it’s the very least we could do.

In fact, the way I see it, you owe it to your applicants to tell them that your business has rejected their application to join your team, and possibly provide them with reasons.

Because, let’s face it, today’s job market is tough and highly competitive, and this reality causes the anxiety level of the average individual to spiral, especially during the waiting period.

And in the same way, letting them know they have been offered the job helps them feel relieved and ready to move on to the next step in their career.

Letting them know that their application has been rejected, brings them clarity, and helps in re-strategizing for success.

Plus, it improves the brand’s reputation.

Stacey Tapping
Owner/CEO, Beauty Sculpting Room

We always inform any rejected candidate formally. We do this mainly for transparency reasons.

Our industry is quite small, and anything that can affect our business’ reputation negatively may have an outsized impact on us. We believe that maintaining open and respectful communication with all applicants reflects our commitment to professionalism.

By being transparent in our processes, we get to preserve relationships and foster a positive impression, even in difficult situations.

Adrien Kallel
CEO & Co-Founder, Remote People

At Remote People, we make it a priority to inform candidates if they haven’t been selected, especially after interviews. It’s about showing respect for their time and effort.

Even a brief, polite message goes a long way in closing the loop. We’ve found that this approach leaves a better impression, and it keeps the door open for future opportunities with strong candidates.

That said, when we’re dealing with a high volume of applications, especially in earlier stages, it can be challenging to respond to everyone individually. In those cases, we sometimes rely on automated responses.

Ultimately, clear communication benefits both sides, and we do our best to maintain that standard.

Lucas Botzen
CEO & HR Expert, Rivermate

Our human resources department sees to it that each candidate receives a thoughtful and personal note in regard to his or her status, whatever that may be. This not only closes the loop for the candidate but engenders a positive impression of our company.

We take it one step further by giving constructive feedback to candidates who made it further in the hiring process. This helps them to understand where they went wrong and what they need to improve, without, at the same time, depleting them of value and respect.

This will help build good karma and will keep candidates coming back when other openings come along. We found that a large percentage of the applicants who were not fitted for one position eventually fitted in another.

By rejecting candidates with an email, you give closure to a candidate and eliminate some of the uncertainty and frustration that often accompanies the recruitment process and positions Rivermate as a caring employer who upholds transparency and professionalism in recruiting.

This would mean my advice to companies trying to incorporate this approach: automate early-stage rejections but make it more personalized later on. Also, standardization of feedback templates is helpful for consistency and saves time for your HR team.

Ryan T. Murphy
Sales Operations Manager, Upfront Operations

As CEO of Upfront Operations, a fractional sales enablement firm, I ensure we provide feedback for all candidates. We value transparency and believe rejected applicants deserve respect.

Constructive feedback helps candidates improve for the next role. Even when we can’t extend an offer, candidates gain a positive view of our hiring process. This goodwill strengthens our employment brand and attracts higher quality candidates, reducing time-to-hire.

For example, a recent marketing candidate lacked experience with our core tools. We explained our needs transparently but suggested resources to build those skills. Though disappointed, the candidate appreciated our candor and professionalism. They now follow us on LinkedIn, demonstrating the value of courteous communication.

Some companies avoid rejections due to time or legal concerns. However, the benefits of a caring, efficient process outweigh costs.

For instance, providing high-level feedback adds mere minutes per applicant but yields a strong candidate pool, higher offer acceptance rates, and word-of-mouth referrals.

With the right approach, communicating rejections can become a key recruitment tool.

Mary Zhang
Head of Marketing and Finance, Dgtl Infra

At DtglInfra, we’ve made it a priority to communicate with all job applicants, including those we don’t move forward with. It’s not just about courtesy – it’s a strategic decision that’s paid off in multiple ways.

We send personalized rejection emails to every candidate who reaches the interview stage. For earlier stage rejections, we use a well-crafted template that offers constructive feedback. This approach has led to a 30% increase in positive company reviews on job sites, boosting our employer brand.

Surprisingly, some rejected candidates have become valuable networking connections or even clients. We had a case where a rejected software engineer referred us to her current employer, resulting in a major contract for our cloud services.

Be genuine and respectful. We’ve found that treating all candidates well, regardless of outcome, creates a positive ripple effect in our industry network. It’s a small effort that yields significant long-term benefits for our talent pipeline and business relationships.

Alex L.
Founder, StudyX

We usually inform all applicants of their interview results, regardless of whether their application is approved or rejected.

We believe that job hunting is a two-way process of choice. Whether the result is good or not, promptly informing applicants shows our company’s respect and professional attitude.

Clear communication and feedback can also help enhance the company’s reputation, as applicants may share their job application experiences with others.

At the same time, if applicants ask about the reasons for rejection, we also provide them with brief suggestions. We hope to help them improve their abilities for later job applications or find a more suitable job direction.

In addition, applicants may frequently follow up on results if they are not informed timely, which may increase the work of the HR team. Early notification can reduce these unnecessary communications.

Amrutha Murali
Senior People Operations Specialist, Codilar Technologies

In our experience, a well thought out hiring process can reassure rejected candidates that they are making progress. While one door may close, it often opens up ten new opportunities just waiting to be explored.

In our organization, we strive to support rejected candidates by reassuring them that while one door may close, you could lead to ten new opportunities.

To achieve this, you need to maintain transparency and fostering a positive candidate experience throughout the recruitment process, even for those who are not selected.

For rejected job applications, our HR team ensures that applicants are informed of the decision, typically through an email or a phone call.

By closing the loop, we leave the door open for potential future opportunities and help candidates gain closure, which is part of our commitment to treating all applicants with respect.

Many candidates who aren’t the right fit for one role could be a good match for other roles in the future. By maintaining a good relationship through open communication, we keep the door open for future collaborations.

On the bright side, a thoughtfully handled rejection can spark referrals or recommendations from the candidate. Taking some extra time with people well can yield a high ROI, even if it isn’t immediately apparent and calculated.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing their insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

6 Reasons Why Employers Scan a Candidate’s Online Behavior

by

Matthew Ramirez HR Spotlight
Max Schwartzapfel - HR Spotlight
Anjela Mangrum - HRSpotlight
Archie Payne - HR Spotlight
Seth Newman - Terkel for HR Spotlight
Yongming Song, CEO, Live Poll for Slides

6 Reasons Why Employers Scan a Candidate’s Online Behavior

Scan Candidate Online Behavior - HRSpotlight

Determines Company Fit

Scanning online behavior can be a great way to see if a candidate is a good fit for the company culture. I’m not talking about seeing their interests or following other companies merely, but rather about how they use their online platform.

Are they posting about going to the gym and eating well, or are they complaining about work or the people they work with? Online profiles are windows into a person’s life, and employers are using them to determine if candidates are the right fit for their company.

Matthew Ramirez, CEO, Rephrasely

Shows the Real Candidate

Employers want to get a fuller idea of what the person they’re hiring is like. Social media can allow them to understand what a person’s behavior represents when they aren’t acting on a script. It provides a more natural view of a candidate than they might see during an interview.

Max Schwartzapfel - HR Spotlight

If understanding a candidate before hiring saves a company from having to deal with behavior troubles or legal liabilities of any sort, then it’s already worth the effort.

Max Schwartzapfel
CMO, Schwartzapfel Lawyers

If understanding a candidate before hiring saves a company from having to deal with behavior troubles or legal liabilities of any sort, then it’s already worth the effort. It will always be better for a company to reject an unsuitable candidate than it will be to fix any issue caused by them in hindsight.

Max Schwartzapfel, CMO, Schwartzapfel Lawyers

Filters Out Troublemakers

I’ve learned the hard way how important it is to conduct candidate background checks, especially their social media profiles.

Five years ago, I hired an apparently perfect candidate for a role, only to have the HR department bombarded with complaints about inappropriate remarks and insensitive behavior towards other employees. Later, I discovered this was the norm for him; his Facebook profile was full of problematic status updates, racist quotes, and shockingly sexist remarks.

Anjela Mangrum - HRSpotlight

With challenging times ahead for businesses, I think it’s better to deep-dive into whatever candidate information is available instead of risking hiring them, only to terminate them and rehire someone else in a month.

Anjela Mangrum
President, Mangrum Career Solutions

Sometimes, online profiles can also provide clues about the legitimacy of applications that seem too good to be true. With challenging times ahead for businesses, I think it’s better to deep-dive into whatever candidate information is available instead of risking hiring them, only to terminate them and rehire someone else in a month. As it is, with the current challenges of running a business, office drama is the last thing we need!

Anjela Mangrum, President, Mangrum Career Solutions

Controls Your Online Reputation

The things that an employee posts or does online don’t just impact their individual reputation; they can also influence how people view or think about your company, even when someone is posting on their personal social media.

Many customers today want to do business with companies that share their values, and job seekers feel the same way about employers. If you hire someone who’s an online bully or regularly posts offensive content, this could lead to people associating these behaviors with your company, and your online reputation as a business can suffer.

Archie Payne - HR Spotlight

If you hire someone who’s an online bully or regularly posts offensive content, this could lead to people associating these behaviors with your company, and your online reputation as a business can suffer.

Archie Payne
CEO, CalTek Staffing

This is aside from the potential impact on your team, culture, and morale from hiring someone who’s hostile, prejudiced, or otherwise toxic, although that’s something else that’s important to consider. Scanning the profiles and posting behavior of candidates before they get through the interview process is an easy way to check for red flags and avoid hiring someone who will cause you these kinds of headaches.

Archie Payne, CEO, CalTek Staffing

Exposes Red Flags

People always warned us in college that employers would search through our social media. It’s true because, as I am in charge of gathering candidates for new openings, the first thing I do when someone applies is look over their social media profiles. We do this to see if they will be a good fit with our company culture.

Obviously, you want employees who will show up on time and get along with others. When I see people who have their profile photos as themselves flipping off the camera and smoking drugs, those are red flags that they probably wouldn’t do well in our culture. With social media, you are supposed to put your best foot forward or show the best side of yourself. Make sure it truly is the best side you are showing others.

Seth Newman, Director, Sporting Smiles

Uncovers the Candidate’s Private Integrity

Social identity online is vital for employers to determine the integrity of potential candidates. Candidates with a dirty online identity can damage the reputation of the brand and link it with associated behaviors, such as racism or sexism.

Online scanning can validate the information that potential candidates provide and help gauge the intangible aspects of trust and integrity. It is also vital for security to avoid hiring candidates involved in illegal activities such as money laundering and cybercrime. It is also a way to eliminate unconscious bias through objective scanning of potential candidates.

Yongming Song, CEO, Live Poll For Slides

Scanning a Candidate’s Online Behavior Does Make a Lot of Sense!

Pick up any of these points shared by workplace leaders and you’ll know there are plenty of valid reasons to review a candidate’s online behavior and determine if they’d be a good fit or not. So the next time you post something or leave a comment without thinking twice, remember that your potential employers will get to it, review it, and probably use it as enough reason to reject you.

Do you have a valid pointer to add to this list? Or is there another topic you’d like to start a conversation around on the HR Spotlight platform?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

6 Warning Signs to Weed Out Wrong Candidates

by

Trey Ferro - Terkel for HR Spotlight
Seth Newman - Terkel for HR Spotlight
Lydia Mwangi - Terkel for HR Spotlight
Matt Erhard - Terkel for HR Spotlight
Lindsey Hight - Terkel for HR Spotlight

6 Warning Signs to Weed Out Wrong Candidates

Vague Answers to Interview Questions

From my experience as an interviewer, the biggest candidate red flag is responding vaguely to questions I ask.

I’ve noticed competent candidates are eager to continue the conversation and provide elaborate answers to interview questions. Their specific, in-depth responses are often enough to prove their credibility. Underqualified candidates or those who have exaggerated their resumes often cannot answer many basic queries, exposing themselves as bad choices for the role.

Anjela Mangrum - HRSpotlight

Underqualified candidates or those who have exaggerated their resumes often cannot answer many basic queries, exposing themselves as bad choices for the role.

Anjela Mangrum, President, Mangrum Career Solutions

For instance, if there’s a certain software critical to their field of work, a suitable candidate will tell me about their experience using it, where they learned how to use it, and what they think about the distinct features. The wrong applicant might name a few features and know their functions, but they usually won’t be able to say anything that proves they have hands-on experience with it.

Anjela Mangrum, President, Mangrum Career Solutions

Lack of Preparation

One warning sign to help weed out wrong candidates is a lack of preparation. If a candidate comes to the interview unprepared, it could be a sign that they are not genuinely interested in the position or that they are not taking the interview process seriously.

Trey Ferro, CEO, Spot Pet Insurance

Poor Representation on Social Media

In college, they always told us to be careful what we posted on social media, and that still holds true. Now that I am in the position of weeding out candidates for open positions at our business, once I see someone apply who has the ideal skill set, the first thing I do is search their social media profiles.

Seth Newman - Terkel for HR Spotlight

The first thing I do is search their social media profiles. Sometimes I find some pretty interesting stuff, like them bashing their former employers or bosses. Other times, I find profile pictures of them flipping the camera off or smoking drugs. Those are just red flags right away that they wouldn’t be a good fit for our company.

Seth Newman, Director, SportingSmiles

Sometimes I find some pretty interesting stuff, like them bashing their former employers or bosses. Other times, I find profile pictures of them flipping the camera off or smoking drugs. Those are just red flags right away that they wouldn’t be a good fit for our company.

Social media gives you the easiest way to present your best self. Make sure you’re presenting yourself in a presentable fashion; otherwise, companies will look elsewhere.

Seth Newman, Director, SportingSmiles

Punctuality Problems

Punctuality problems persist. If a candidate is late for an important interview, this reveals a lack of planning. This will not only reflect on the time they arrive at the office each day, but also on how promptly they complete their tasks, and their ability to plan and organize work-related tasks.

If a person can’t plan their morning well, I don’t see how you can expect them to plan a work event, serve customers on time, or even come up with a working strategy at work.

Lydia Mwangi, Content Writer, Barbell Jobs

Negativity

It’s human nature to complain about work from time to time, but there is a time and place to do so. A job interview definitely isn’t the place to air grievances from past jobs.

I want to see candidates focusing on their strengths and value, not using their interview time to complain about other people, and this can also be a red flag of a potentially toxic employee who would be detrimental to your team’s morale and culture.

Matt Erhard - Terkel for HR Spotlight

It’s human nature to complain about work from time to time, but there is a time and place to do so. A job interview definitely isn’t the place to air grievances from past jobs. 

Matt Erhard, Managing Partner, Summit Search Group

Similarly, I am wary of candidates who bring work drama into their social media feeds. Again, there’s nothing wrong with a post or two complaining about a hard day. What flags me is when they regularly post workplace gossip, get into arguments with coworkers, or have similarly immature online interactions with colleagues.

This kind of behavior can both affect team morale and reflect poorly on your company and is a definite red flag for me when I’m considering candidates.

Matt Erhard, Managing Partner, Summit Search Group

Punctuation and Grammar Errors

One of the major warning signs we look for to help weed out wrong candidates is punctuation and grammar errors in their cover letters and resumes. Poor punctuation, grammar, and spelling errors are a sign that the applicant is not detail-oriented and may not be the right fit for our department.

Lindsey Hight, HR Professional, Renue Commercial

It’s All About Keeping Your Eyes Open

There are multiple criteria that help decide if a candidate is right for the job or not, but when it comes to warning signs, all you need is one to weed out a wrong candidate. All you have to do is keep your eyes open.

Of course, even more important is to ensure that the rest of your team is quickly made aware of the problem. Once you have a manager’s approval, you can update the candidate’s details in your red flag section, so that the next time the candidate approaches your organization, everyone on the HR team receives an alert.

Do you rely on warning signs to help you weed out wrong candidates? Or is there another insight you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.