Menu

Management

The Impact of H-1B Visa Changes on Corporate Mobility

by

May 20, 2026

The Impact of H-1B Visa Changes on Corporate Mobility

By Kelly Cruse, Vice President, Human Resources and Chief Diversity Officer at Atlas Van Lines

The H-1B process has always been complex, but recent changes have made it more difficult, confusing, and in some cases, significantly more expensive.

A Presidential Proclamation issued on Sept. 19, 2025, noted that certain H-1B petitions “filed at or after Sept. 21, 2025, must be accompanied by an additional $100,000 payment as a condition of eligibility.”

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) later clarified the $100,000 fee does not apply to most H-1B filings, such as extensions of stay or transfers. Rather, it is for a segment of cap-subject H-1B hires “who are outside the United States and will seek consular processing for an H-1B visa or those already in the U.S. who cannot obtain a change of status or extension of stay.”

Even with clarification, the hefty price tag has already directly impacted most companies’ relocation budgets. With remaining questions and pending litigation, this is far from a compliance issue – it is fundamentally changing how companies budget, plan, and justify global talent mobility.

  • The Data

Each year, Atlas Van Lines conducts its Corporate Relocation Survey to gauge talent mobility trends and corporate relocation policies and practices. The 59th annual survey was conducted between Dec. 15, 2025, and Jan. 16, 2026, with 549 decision-makers across 20 industries who are responsible for relocation at small, medium, and large companies globally.

The survey found that the H-1B visa fee had some level of impact on the relocation budgets of 94% of companies that relocate employees internationally. In response, 82% of those companies also adjusted their relocation policies in 2025 and anticipated further impact on company relocation policies in 2026.

Among external factors impacting relocation, political/regulatory considerations showed the largest increase from 2024 to 2025 at 9%. Relatedly, over half of companies surveyed (53%) agreed that economic conditions were the top external factor that impacted relocation in 2025.

  • The Impact

H-1B changes present challenges across companies’ operations. Not only does it impact cost and compliance, but it also affects talent acquisition and retention. H-1B visas are typically reserved for highly specialized roles that cannot be fulfilled by American workers. The snowball effect of an increased cost burden can slow hiring timelines and result in an unwillingness to relocate – for employees and employers.

For employees, shifts in hiring and visa status can reduce access to career-advancing opportunities that come with geographic mobility. Meanwhile, for employers, it introduces added friction in securing highly specialized or international talent, especially in industries where those skills are already in short supply.

  • The Challenge for HR Professionals

Global talent mobility plays a crucial role in addressing labor shortages across essential industries. Corporate relocation serves as a lever for accessing this international talent pool, and even modest changes to visa policies can have an impact on this pipeline.

Key industries such as manufacturing, IT/technology, and business services rely on international talent. Manufacturing, for example, is in need of 3.8 million new workers by 2033. Nearly half of those jobs are at risk of going unfilled, putting additional pressure on HR teams already working to secure specialized talent. This demand reinforces why international mobility remains a necessary tool for workforce planning.

Therefore, HR professionals find themselves at the center of visa confusion by representing both the employees’ and employers’ best interests. How they budget for relocations is an indicator of the balance they try to strike.

  • How Companies Are Adapting

Rather than adjusting relocation budgets as a reaction to markets, HR teams should pursue proactive policy changes to stay ahead of employees’ needs. Increasingly, that means shifting away from rigid policies in favor of flexibility, or risk losing employees. When asked, 52% of companies agreed that they lost good employees due in part to a relocation policy. Perhaps relatedly, 51% of companies also said they almost always or frequently make exceptions to relocation policies.

Cost-of-living adjustments were also the most common nonstandard incentive companies provided In addition to fixed and flexible benefits. Additional targeted nonstandard incentives included bonuses and housing benefits. They proved effective: In 2025, 89% of companies said nonstandard incentives frequently or almost always convinced an employee to relocate.

For companies that ultimately need to reduce costs, 30% said they planned to offer short-term, extended travel, or commuter arrangements in 2026 instead of relocating employees. Alternative assignments are also an effective way to lower costs, with 36% of companies using them to meet strategic business goals.

Finally, remote work is still a desirable perk for employees. The ability to work remotely (15%) or an employer’s policy limiting remote work (10%) were both cited as reasons employees declined a relocation. Alternative assignments and remote work could both be effective ways of working with international prospects when visas may be more difficult or expensive to obtain.

  • Final Thoughts

The impact of H-1B changes on relocation budgets underscores a longer-term shift in how companies are approaching global mobility from a routine function to a strategic advantage. Companies are being forced to weigh global access to specialized talent against budget constraints caused in part by evolving visa requirements. Yet, a majority are still choosing to expand their budgets and devise more tailored relocation packages to entice top talent. Corporate mobility is more about precision than volume in this environment, reserved for roles where cross-border relocation is essential.

Ultimately, there is no one-size-fits-all solution to corporate relocations. Companies that adapt their mobility strategies to promote flexible policies will be better positioned to compete for skilled workers and be better equipped to handle future policy changes.

Kelly Cruse

About the Author

With over 20 years of experience in human resources, Kelly Cruse serves as Atlas Van Lines’ Vice President, Human Resources and Chief Diversity Officer. She oversees the development and implementation of HR strategies, policies, and programs that align with the company’s vision, mission, and values. Cruse has a strong background in employee benefits, performance management, talent acquisition, and employee relations.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions


Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

The ‘Cockroach’ in Your Break Room Is Why Your Top Talent Is Quitting

by

May 15, 2026

The ‘Cockroach’ in Your Break Room Is Why Your Top Talent Is Quitting

By Tim Whitt

On paper, your team looks fine.

Revenue is steady, trucks are rolling, and nobody’s flipping desks or screaming in meetings. And yet, quietly, your best people are leaving. Not with a dramatic blowup, but with a polite two weeks’ notice and a vague “I found a better opportunity.”

You probably do what most owners do: blame the market, remote work, or “kids these days.” But there’s a good chance the real problem isn’t coming from the outside. It’s in your own building.

More specifically, it’s in your break room. Sitting at the same table. Drinking the same coffee. Doing the same bare minimum they’ve done for years.

I call this person the cockroach.

Just like real cockroaches, these employees don’t usually cause a big, obvious scene. They don’t scream at customers, they don’t steal trucks, and they don’t do anything spectacularly wrong. They just survive. They show up, contribute as little as possible, and retreat back into the shadows when things get tough.

Everyone knows they’re dead weight—except, apparently, leadership.

Here’s the hard truth: your top performers aren’t quitting because of one big disaster. They’re quitting because they’re sick of living in a house where cockroaches are allowed to roam the halls.

Let’s talk about how to spot a cockroach, why they’re so toxic to your best people, and what to do about it before you lose anyone else you’d actually fight to keep.

  • 1. Learn to Spot the “Harmless” Cockroach

Real cockroaches don’t strip your pantry bare; they contaminate everything they touch. The same is true in a business.

Your cockroach employee usually looks like this:

  •       They’ve “always been here” and are treated as untouchable.
  •       Their production is barely acceptable, but never quite bad enough to trigger formal action.
  •       When something goes wrong, they somehow weren’t responsible for that account, that route, or that file.
  •       When things go right, they’re standing in the group photo taking the credit.

They don’t rage. They don’t openly sabotage. And they rarely break rules in a way you can easily document. That’s what makes them so slippery. If you challenge them, they’ve got excuses ready: “The office messed that up,” “Dispatch didn’t tell me,” “The system is glitchy,” “The customer was unreasonable.”

From a distance, you may think, “Is addressing this really worth the headache? We’re busy. He’s not that bad.”

But your team sees something very different. They see a person who contributes the least and suffers the least. That gap between effort and consequence is what starts to poison your culture.

 

To find the cockroach employee, take these steps:

Over the next 30 days, carefully review employee metrics. Don’t just check gross production. Check the following:

  •     Average daily workload compared to peers.
  •     Callback rate, complaints, and rework others had to absorb.
  •     How often this person is somehow “not involved” when there’s a problem.

If the data confirms what your gut already knows, congratulations. You’ve found your cockroach.

  • 2. Understand Why Top Performers Take It Personally

Your high performers can live with hard work. They signed up for that. What they won’t live with is unfairness.

When your best techs, sales reps, or administrative staff see someone like the cockroach skate by for years, a few things happen:

  •     They start to question your judgment.

“If the boss can’t see this, what else is he missing?”

  •     They start to question the point of excellence.

“Why am I beating myself up if Carl makes the same paycheck doing half as much?”

  •     They start to question their future with you.

“If this is the standard here, maybe this isn’t where I want to build my career.”

That’s how you lose people who actually drive the business.

From the cockroach’s perspective, survival is the game. From your top talent’s perspective, the game is rigged. When they decide to leave, it rarely has anything to do with the last straw; they’ve been collecting straws for years while you were looking the other way.

 

Your next steps:

Have an honest, off–the–record conversation with one or two of your strongest people. Ask them one question:

“Who here gets away with the most while contributing the least?”

Don’t defend, and don’t explain. Just listen. If the same name comes up more than once, you’ve just witnessed how your culture actually feels from the inside.

  • 3. Turn on the Lights: Make Performance Transparent

Cockroaches thrive in the dark. They love vague expectations, fuzzy metrics, and leaders who prefer “not rocking the boat.”

So, flip the lights on.

You don’t need to shame people, but you do need to make contributions visible. That means:

  •     Clear standards: For every role, define what a full day of work looks like, the minimum that’s acceptable, and what true excellence looks like.
  •     Shared scoreboards: Production, callbacks, rework, and attendance shouldn’t live in a private spreadsheet that only you see. Your team should know where they stand relative to one another, not only to fuel competition but to make patterns obvious.
  •     Documented follow‑through: When someone consistently underperforms, there should be a visible sequence: coaching, written expectations, and real consequences if nothing changes.

Cockroach employees are masters at hiding behind ambiguity. The moment you define specific expectations and track them consistently, their cover starts to crack. Either they step up—unlikely, but possible—or their lack of contribution becomes undeniable.

 

Your next steps:

Pick three metrics that clearly define “pulling your weight” for one role, say, a field technician:

  •     Number of completed stops per day (adjusted for route complexity).
  •     Callback rate over a 90–day period.
  •     On time start and completion rates.

Share these with the team, start posting them weekly, and commit to talking with anyone who consistently falls below the line. You’ve just made the environment much more hostile for cockroaches.

  • 4. Stop Protecting “Institutional Knowledge” at the Expense of Culture

One reason cockroach employees survive so long is fear. Leaders are afraid of what will happen if they’re gone.

“They know all the legacy accounts.”

“No one else understands that software.”

“They’re the only one who knows where that information is.”

So you tolerate low effort, bad habits, and quiet resistance because losing them feels risky.

Here’s the reality: you’re already paying a steep price to keep them. You’re paying in morale, turnover, and trust. You’re paying every time a strong performer shoulders their work while cockroach employees coast. You’re paying every time you find yourself thinking, “I can’t let them go; they know too much.”

 

Your next steps:

Start a 60‑day “knowledge extraction” sprint:

  •     Have the cockroach document key processes, logins, and client details.
  •     Pair them, at least temporarily, with a stronger employee to cross‑train.
  •     Move any critical information out of their head and into your systems.

You’re not threatening them; you’re reducing the hostage value of what they know. Once that’s done, you suddenly have options: coach them up with clear expectations—or coach them out. Either way, they no longer hold your culture hostage.

  • 5. Send a Clear Signal: Survival Isn’t a Strategy Here

Eventually, you’re going to have to make a decision about your cockroach.

You can keep nudging, coaching, and hoping they magically transform into a high performer. Or you can accept that their greatest skill is survival and ask yourself a better question:

“What message am I sending everyone else by keeping this person here?”

When you finally remove a cockroach employee—even if it’s uncomfortable, even if there’s short term disruption—you send a shockwave through the team. And it’s not the shockwave you fear.

Most high performers don’t think, “Wow, that could have been me.” They think, “Finally. The boss sees what we’ve been living with.” Trust goes up, not down. People breathe a little easier. Standards make more sense. The house feels cleaner.

You don’t build a strong culture by giving big speeches. You build it with a few decisive moments where you prove, through action, what you will and will not tolerate.

 

Your next steps:

Look at your roster and ask: “If I were starting this company from scratch tomorrow, would I rehire this person?” If the honest answer is no, that’s your signal. Either start a real improvement plan with clear deadlines, or start planning their exit. Keeping them “because it’s easier” is exactly why your best people are polishing their resumes.

  • The bottom line

If you find a cockroach in your kitchen, you don’t debate how bad it is. You call it what it is and deal with it. Your business deserves the same urgency.

“If you won’t evict the cockroach in your break room, don’t be surprised when your best people decide to find a cleaner house.”

Tim Whitt

About the Author

Tim Whitt is an entrepreneur with 45 years in pest control: 30 in corporate leadership and 15 building Pied Piper Pest & Lawn from the ground up. A speaker, coach, and author, he offers field-tested wisdom and practical tools that help both new and established businesses. His newly released book is Infested: End Workplace Drama, Stop Toxic Employees, Build a Thriving Small Business. Learn more at TimWhitt.com.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions


Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

Why Best Practices Hold You Back: When Yesterday’s Logic Meets Today’s Complexity

by

May 14, 2026

Why Best Practices Hold You Back

When Yesterday’s Logic Meets Today’s Complexity

By Kursten Faller and Alan Weiss

Best practices are often viewed as the key to success in the business world. Certifications to prove practitioners are competent in accordance with a best practice make sense at the surface. However, they’ve become psychological cover that create mediocre results at best. It’s reassuring to be able to point at the protocol and say, “I followed the best practice. It’s not my fault.”

Take project management, for example. Most project managers I’ve met (my younger self included) come from technical backgrounds who love best practices. I genuinely thought project management was about following the best practice and forcing people to follow my plan. Spoiler alert: That didn’t work.

With today’s disruption and volatility, “business as usual” means little when there’s no “usual” anywhere in sight. Although Disruption and Volatility would make great names for a law firm, they require an adaptive approach to ensure survival and sustainability. 

Best practices bring a false measure of certainty for keeping threats at bay. However, they’re largely irrelevant as they’re developed by looking in the rearview mirror according to what worked under the conditions at that time. 

The solution is enhancing critical thinking to navigate complexity in real time.

These days, to be successful, you need to be adaptable. This requires developing the critical thinking skills to solve the unique challenges your situation presents. To do so, follow these tips:

  • Don’t mistake motion for mastery

Attending endless meetings, always agreeing with leadership, escalating decisions, and “checking the boxes” that show you observed the best practice are all compliance-based behavior. You feel like you’re providing value but are really providing only superficial benefit. Busy work consumes energy. It moves the needle little in terms of value delivered. This puts your organization and yourself at risk.

Mastery comes from thoughtful distillation to what matters. Condense your work down to its essence — the 1 percent that really moves the needle. This involves having the important coaching conversation to shift the thinking of a team member, sharing the contrarian viewpoint that no one else sees, or carving out time for learning and growth to build new thinking. These are all leverage plays that return far more over time than they consume.

  • Understand that best practices become so in hindsight

I started my career in engineering and realized early on that the work I did was a “good enough” approximation of the real-world physics my designs operated in. This allowed me to build things that consistently worked at a reasonable cost. 

Best practices are an approximation of what works in the real world. However, they’re only a snapshot of what worked at one point in time in the past. The business environment evolves rapidly at an ever-increasing rate of change. Best practices are backward looking and largely irrelevant to the modern environment in which we try to apply them.

This is why we talk of “better” practices and not “best” practices. You should always be getting better in the system in which you operate. Once you think you’ve arrived at the “best,” there’s no point to continue getting better. That leads to complacency.

  • Realize that value lies beneath the surface

Understand what the organization you work within truly values. I often find when working with clients that whatever leadership thinks provides value in terms of outcomes are in tension with what leaders actually show they value day to day. For example, they may say the organization needs to be the top innovator in its industry globally. Then, leaders micromanage, reinforce compliance, and criticize mistakes. You can’t get to innovation if you value compliance, shame risk-taking, and make it intimidating for people to pursue efforts that might come up short. 

Success comes to those who are brave and can push back against the behavioral norms despite the daily rhetoric. Speak up when it feels uncomfortable. Have one high leverage conversation tomorrow that you’ve been putting off. I rarely meet leaders that don’t value results when you show them you can achieve them. 

People who can do this write their own ticket. That means you need to be ready for some social discomfort on your journey to delivering the results your organization truly wants.

Best practices are misaligned with the needs of the modern business environment because they’re rooted in yesterday’s logic and provide convenient psychological cover. In a world that previously rewarded compliance, many professionals were never required to develop strong critical thinking. That world has shifted. Leaders must move beyond the comfort those practices once provided and focus instead on the high leverage work that creates real outcomes. 

The willingness to think, question, and adapt is now what separates compliance from true leadership.

Kursten Faller

About the Author

Kursten Faller is an organizational advisor with more than 25 years of experience helping executives strengthen the human systems that drive performance inside complex organizations. As founder of Centric Business Consulting, he works with leadership teams to improve decision quality, accountability, and execution in environments where technological capability is accelerating faster than leadership adaptation.

Alan Weiss

About the Author

Alan Weiss is a globally recognized consultant, speaker, and author renowned for his expertise in organizational development and personal growth. As founder of Summit Consulting Group, Inc., he has advised more than 500 leading organizations worldwide including Merck, Hewlett Packard, GE, Mercedes Benz, and the Federal Reserve.

Their new book, The Hidden Project Drivers: Building Behavior that Drives Success (Business Expert Press, April 3, 2026), explores how human behavior, leadership maturity, and decision making determine whether projects deliver meaningful outcomes.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions


Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

How to Avoid the Most Preventable Form of Employee Turnover

by

May 06, 2026

How to Avoid the Most Preventable Form of Employee Turnover

Clark A. Ingram, Founder and President, People Profits, LLC

Finding the right people committed to staying with your organization starts with making sure that you and the job applicant are on the same page. 

Many times, while working with an organization, I see employees who should never have been hired. Often it’s due to either the organization not identifying in detail their target candidate criteria or making unwise exceptions to their criteria. The excuse is always the same: “We need bodies — now.”

Job candidates make it even worse when they don’t have their own criteria for what they’re looking for in an employer. They say: “I need a job — now.”

It’s only a matter of time before the employee decides to move on or the organization decides they “don’t fit in.” 

This is amazing to me. They decide six months later that the employee doesn’t fit in? The organization should have known back when they reviewed the candidate’s application or during the interview that the person didn’t meet their criteria. Both the organization and the employee are hurt for the same reason — trading a short-term problem for a long-term one — and they’ve wasted a lot of each other’s time. 

In these cases, the organization has done a disservice to the employee by hiring them with a very real chance they won’t fit in. They’ve also damaged their organization by setting up a future problem that will need to be resolved.

  • Finding great candidates who won’t leave

Here are the real questions organizations need to address: What do our ideal candidates look like and how can we find them? Think of that old cliché that you can’t hit a target you can’t see. 

Finding quality people becomes a lot easier once you’ve identified your candidate criteria in detail. Then it’s a matter of finding the appropriate sources and determining how to get their attention. 

One company I knew of hired every Machinist Mate out of the Navy they could get their hands on. The reason was simple: given the skills those employees had obtained in the Navy, they already had most of the capabilities needed for the job when they started. They also had a work ethic and were revenue positive much quicker than other candidates. 

On the flip side, what about the candidates’ criteria? What are they looking for? Not knowing is a related root cause to employee turnover. 

Many candidates are looking for a “good job.” What does that mean? For that individual, it can mean many different things. The more information you can provide about your organization, the more the candidate can reflect. “Is what you’re hearing sound like something you want to do?” “Does the culture and environment feel comfortable?” Clarifying these aspects up front will help them think through what they’re looking for.

You should also look hard at their resumes and their answers to your questions. They may be giving you indirect clues as to what they’re after. If you get the feeling the candidate is just after a job, move on.

  • The better your employees, the fewer you will need

It’s much more prevalent now for people to try a job and then decide whether to jump. This means you must get them to see why they should stay. 

On the other hand, the better candidates are looking at how they’ll fit in, grow, and be challenged in the future. They’re looking for a “value path” showing them how they can bring value to the organization and how their increased value is rewarded. Good employees expect the organization to articulate and then provide this path.

Many companies struggle with establishing how employees will be challenged beyond what they were hired for originally. Employees want a clearly defined, well-thought-out path, in writing — including the training, experience, and accomplishment standards for success. When your organization has this as a recruiting tool, you’re able to recruit, hire, and retain the type of employees you want and need.

  • Good people bring better people; bad people bring worse people

This fundamental truth regarding good and unsuitable employees affects your employee turnover in so many ways. So how do you maximize the good and minimize the bad?

  1. Be able to spot the differences before the time of hire.
  1. Fully understand the multilevel cost of bad employees.
  1. Know your organizational opportunities and sell them to candidates.
  1. Recognize that hiring just to provide warm bodies is always detrimental in the long run.

Prevent employee turnover and gain control of your hiring process by clearly showing who you are. Be able to read between the lines of a resume and discover who candidates really are. Develop value paths to instantly show your candidates the opportunities available. Employing these strategies, you’ll begin to pull in who you need and fend off who you don’t.

Clark Ingram

About the Author

Clark A. Ingram is the Founder and President of People Profits, LLC, which focuses on the three greatest human capital problems affecting organizations: employee turnover, chronically open positions, and skills gap. He consults with a spectrum of companies and has consistently reduced turnover by more than 40 percent in the first year and achieved staffing at more than 90 percent. His new book is Churn: Proven Strategies to Overcome Failing Conventional Talent Management and Achieve Zero Turnover (People Profits, March 26, 2026). Learn more at peopleprofits.com.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions


Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

From Friction to Feedback: Leaders on Turning Policy Pushback into Progress

by

From Friction to Feedback: Leaders on Turning Policy Pushback into Progress

In the evolving landscape of work, where flexibility once felt like a hard-won victory, certain HR policies continue to stir quiet (and sometimes loud) resistance from employees. 

Why do rules that seem logical on paper—return-to-office mandates, rigid performance reviews, mandatory tech adoption—often land like unwelcome intrusions? 

On HRSpotlight, candid executives, CEOs, HR advisors, and culture builders open up about the single policy that reliably generates the strongest pushback in their organizations, and the thoughtful, human-centered ways they’ve turned friction into alignment. 

From return-to-office mandates met with pleas for autonomy, to annual reviews that feel disconnected from daily reality, to AI tool rollouts that threaten professional identity—these leaders reveal how resistance rarely stems from laziness or entitlement. 

Instead, it signals a deeper need for trust, voice, and purpose. 

Their shared strategies—transparent “why” conversations, employee co-creation, flexible compromises, continuous feedback models, empathy-led transitions—demonstrate that the most resisted policies can become the most embraced when handled with clarity, inclusion, and genuine care. 

Explore which approaches are quietly reshaping compliance into commitment.

Read on!

Najeeb Khan
Head of Training & Events, Teamland

At Teamland, where we collaborate with HR leaders to improve engagement and team performance, one of the policies employees often push back against is the annual performance review process.

Many employees find it outdated or anxiety-inducing, especially when feedback feels one-sided or disconnected from their daily work.

The resistance usually reflects a deeper desire for ongoing feedback and recognition, not opposition to accountability.

We recommend addressing this by shifting to continuous feedback models supported by regular team check-ins and coaching sessions.

This approach helps HR foster transparency, strengthen trust, and turn performance reviews into growth conversations rather than evaluations.

Continuous Feedback Ends Annual Review Dread

Rebecca Trotsky
Chief People Officer, HR Acuity

Policies that try to control where or how people work are the ones employees push back on the most.

But there’s nuance here: Our people aren’t resisting work; they’re resisting a loss of trust and autonomy.

The way to address that resistance is to give teams agency. Let them define their own moments that matter for collaboration, strategy and connection, whether virtual or in person. Back it up with clear intent and make the experience meaningful.

When presence is purposeful, not mandated, employees feel trusted and engaged.

The future of work isn’t hybrid or remote—it’s human.

When we design work around trust and autonomy, people don’t just show up, they show up with purpose.

Agency Over Control Sparks True Engagement

Marcus Denning
Senior Lawyer, MK Law

As the CEO of MK Law I have experienced both the legal aspects of managing an organization as well as the human element of managing a diverse group of professional staff members.

Combining my experience of Commercial Leadership and my knowledge of Criminal Law provides me with a unique understanding of how to handle employee complaints and develop successful methods for removing obstacles that are present at the workplace.

One of the primary reasons that employees resist implementing many HR policies is due to the strictness of the annual performance evaluation process.

Employees typically believe that they are separate from their daily job and therefore will be frustrated by the evaluations.

There is a disconnect between the type of feedback employees receive during their annual evaluation and the employees’ work over the course of the entire year within the traditional model.

Continuous feedback is the best method to reduce or eliminate the resistance to implementing a new HR policy such as a shift to a continuous feedback model.

Managers must continuously communicate with employees regarding their performance and recognize employees for their accomplishments on an ongoing basis.

This continuous communication results in an employee who is more engaged, motivated and productive in their role.

Ongoing Feedback Replaces Stressful Yearly Reviews

David Weisselberger
Entrepreneur, Erase The Case

A common area of resistance among the workplace policies developed by Human Resource departments has been the long-standing, rigid performance evaluation process.

Due to the fact that these reviews are traditionally conducted annually, employees view them as being separate from their daily work responsibilities, which can lead to frustration and a disengaged workforce.

In response to this, I suggest moving away from the traditional performance evaluation model and toward a continuous feedback model.

Under this model, instead of waiting until formal performance review times, managers will provide employees with continuous, timely feedback based on each employee’s performance.

Early recognition of accomplishments and identification of opportunities for growth and development creates an environment where employees feel comfortable communicating openly about their job, while also allowing employees to make proactive changes to their work assignments as needed.

Timely Feedback Stops Annual Review Pushback

Nathan Wadding
CEO, Kindling Culture Agency

One HR policy employees often push back against is mandatory technology adoption—especially around AI tools.

While these policies are intended to increase efficiency, they can feel threatening to people whose expertise and identity are tied to their work. The resistance isn’t really about technology; it’s about purpose, pride, and security.

To address this, leaders need to focus on how the change happens, not just the outcome.

Start by defining what AI means to your organization and connect it clearly to your mission. Identify early adopters to model success, provide extra support for those less comfortable, and create forums for open conversation.

Most importantly, honor the experience people bring.

If you respect their value and invite them to help shape the transition, they’ll be far more likely to embrace it.

Honor Expertise to Ease AI Adoption

Hassan Elbiali
Owner, Agendapedia

One HR policy that consistently encounters pushback is mandatory return-to-office requirements after extended remote work periods.

Many employees value the flexibility and autonomy of remote work; sudden shifts can feel restrictive or dismissive of individual needs.
To address this resistance, HR leaders should prioritize transparent communication—clearly outlining the business rationale and listening to employee concerns.

Incorporating flexible hybrid options, gathering regular feedback, and actively involving staff in policy discussions builds trust and fosters buy-in.

By demonstrating empathy and a willingness to adapt, companies can ease the transition and maintain morale.

Empathy + Options Soften Return-to-Office Pushback

James Bernard
Principal Owner, Alcatraz Escape Games

I run haunted attractions and escape rooms in Utah, so I’ve dealt with plenty of team resistance–especially around our actor training requirements and safety protocols.

The biggest pushback I’ve seen is against time restrictions during team activities.

When we introduced the 5-minute rule at Alcatraz Escape Games (if your team is stuck for 5+ minutes without progress, you must ask for a hint), corporate groups initially hated it. They saw it as admitting defeat. But when I showed them completion data–teams using hints strategically had an 87% escape rate vs. 34% for teams who refused help–the resistance melted away.

People want to win more than they want to be stubborn.

My approach is to frame policies around success metrics, not compliance.

Instead of “you have to ask for hints,” I positioned it as “here’s how winning teams manage their 60 minutes.”

At Castle of Chaos, when we mandated that actors complete improv training, I didn’t sell it as a requirement–I showed them footage of guest reactions when actors adapted in real-time versus following scripts. Suddenly everyone wanted that training.

The key is making the policy feel like a competitive advantage for them, not a restriction on them. Show the scoreboard, not the rulebook.

Show the Scoreboard, Not the Rulebook

Gerald Michaels
Owner, Adept Construction

I’ve been running a family roofing company in the Chicago suburbs since 1997, so I’ve seen my share of policy battles with crews.

The one that gets the most pushback? Mandatory pre-job site photos and documentation. When we required every team to spend 15 minutes before starting work photographing existing conditions–not just the roof, but landscaping, driveways, AC units–the complaints were instant. Guys saw it as wasted time when they could be setting up ladders.

I fixed it by showing them the insurance claim we avoided in Downers Grove.

A homeowner tried to say we cracked their driveway during a tear-off, but our pre-job photos proved that crack existed before we arrived.

That single documentation saved us a $3,200 repair bill and kept our insurance rates from spiking. I told the crew: “You’re not taking pictures for me–you’re protecting yourself from getting blamed for damage you didn’t cause.”

The real shift happened when one of our longtime foremen had a customer claim we damaged their gutter during a Villa Park job. He pulled up his time-stamped photos showing the gutter was already dented, and the complaint died immediately. Now the same guys who fought the policy are the ones who take the most thorough photos–they realize it’s 15 minutes of protection against weeks of headaches and disputes that could tank their reputation.

Fifteen Minutes of Photos Beats Weeks of Headaches

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights:
https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article:
https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client:
https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions


Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

Recent Posts

Discover the latest HR Tips and trends with our weekly newsletters!

The Discipline Gap: Practical Measures to Restore Standards at Work

by

The Discipline Gap: Practical Measures to Restore Standards at Work

In today’s fast-evolving workplaces, a quiet erosion of discipline often signals deeper cracks—disengagement, unclear expectations, or mounting personal pressures—rather than simple defiance. 

What if the real solution lies not in stricter rules, but in rebuilding human connections, understanding beliefs that drive behavior, and balancing accountability with genuine compassion? 

On HR Spotlight, leading HR professionals and business executives reveal practical, insightful approaches to restore focus and productivity without relying on fear or heavy-handed policies. 

From repairing trust through transparent conversations and modeling consistent leadership, to implementing progressive discipline systems, celebrating positive behaviors, addressing root causes like financial stress via emergency savings programs, and empowering younger generations with focus tools—these experts demonstrate how culture, clarity, and empathy can transform slipping standards into renewed commitment. 

Discover their battle-tested strategies that foster ownership and long-term engagement.

Read on!

Milos Eric
General Manager, OysterLink

When discipline breaks down, HR needs to step back from policies and start focusing on repairing culture.

In many situations ‘indiscipline’ is not outright defiance, it is a reflection of loss of engagement and lack of clarity about expectations.

The first step needs to be repairing trust and transparency. Ask employees in one-on-one conversations what they think has changed. As a follow up to that, there needs to be consistency.

Rules/practices only work when leaders model them daily.

HR needs to pair accountability with compassion by collecting data and neutral feedback systems and regularly asking how people are doing to catch behavior developments in the early vale.

Positive behavior needs to be recognized and celebrated as publicly as correcting bad behavior.

A final step is that leaders need to be trained to articulate expectations in precise, fair and respectful terms.

The most disciplined workplaces are not those that instill fear, but places where people truly believe their behavior matters.

Repair Trust to Restore True Discipline

Graham Cherrett
Founder, The Longley Sales

The question “why is employee discipline declining?” Is almost impossible to directly answer as the decline is simply a symptom of an underlying issue.

The best way to understand what leads a person or group to change their behaviour is to understand what drives people to act the way they do.

By understanding how we are all built to navigate through life we can then follow the breadcrumbs back to the underlying issue of declining discipline.

The origin of all human behaviour is BELIEF.

Whatever the person believes about the task at hand starts a psychological cascade that ends driving their behavior and ultimately the results they get.

This cascade will be positive or negative depending on the underlying belief.

The BELIEF causes the person to THINK a certain way about the task at hand – the thoughts causes them to FEEL feelings that magnify the thoughts – the thoughts and feelings are the precursor to how they ACT (how disciplined they are) – their actions generate the RESULTS they get – their results will typically serve to reinforce the BELIEF that started the whole cycle.

This belief cycle can work in a positive way or a downward spiral.

Once you understand the psychological cascade at play you can dig into a person’s or team’s feelings, thoughts and beliefs about the task at hand because this is where change can happen.

Beliefs Drive Behavior—Change Starts There

Julia Spahiu
HR Consultant, Edi and Sienna Group

HR can address declining employee discipline by first re-establishing clear expectations and ensuring all staff understand updated policies, standards, and consequences.

Managers should receive training on consistent enforcement, proper documentation, and how to handle misconduct professionally, as inconsistency often leads to confusion and decreased accountability.

Implementing a structured progressive discipline system such as verbal warnings, written warnings, and final corrective actions helps create fairness and transparency.

HR should also analyze potential root causes, including workload issues, low morale, or leadership gaps, to determine whether deeper cultural or operational problems are contributing to the decline.

Offering refresher training, promoting positive behavior through recognition, and addressing chronic offenders promptly all help reinforce expectations.

Together, these actions help rebuild a respectful, accountable, and productive workplace environment.

Progressive Discipline Builds Fair Accountability

Samah T. Abukhodeir
Founder, The Florida Probate & Family Law Firm

Leading a fast-growing law firm has shown me that slipping discipline usually signals a communication or culture issue, not a people issue.

HR should start by talking to employees one-on-one.

Some may feel overlooked, some may be stretched thin, and others may be dealing with personal issues.

Once you understand the “why” and when you show real interest, the tone shifts fast.

But support only works when paired with accountability and the company culture sets the standard here.

If someone repeatedly ignores their duties and nothing happens, you’re teaching everyone else that effort is optional.

That’s when performance drops across the board.

HR should revisit policies, make expectations clear, and train managers to address issues right away instead of letting them grow.

Early conversations, written expectations, and consistent action give employees a fair chance to correct course before things escalate.

Empathy + Swift Action Prevents Decline

Kyla Dufresne
Founder & CEO, Foxy Box Headquarters

At Foxy Box, we believe discipline starts with culture, not control.

When accountability slips, it’s usually a sign that connection, clarity, or communication has too.

HR’s job isn’t to police, it’s to realign and reignite. Start by re-establishing clear expectations and values, then have real conversations about what’s shifted and why.

Recognize wins publicly, address issues privately, and make sure every team member knows how their role impacts the bigger picture.

Empower leaders to model the behavior they want to see, because energy is contagious.

When people feel seen, supported, and part of something that matters, discipline naturally follows.

Culture Reignites Discipline, Not Control

Ally Meyers
Certified Executive, Ally Meyers Coaching and Training

In today’s workplace, flexibility and trust are key to attracting and retaining talent, but discipline is still essential for cutting through distractions and getting meaningful work done.

Millennials now make up the largest share of the workforce, with Gen Z expected to reach 30% by 2030.

Both generations, raised in a digital world, face unique focus challenges. HR can help them balance the flexibility they value with the productivity organizations need.

Three effective strategies include:

– Systemize one-on-ones. Hold biweekly meetings to create a consistent space for feedback and accountability.


– Celebrate small wins. Recognizing progress and small goal achievements fuels motivation and builds momentum.


– Prioritize focus time. Provide tools and norms that protect uninterrupted work through digital wellness training, deep work blocks, and team challenges that promote mindful technology use.

Focus Tools Empower Gen Z Productivity

Patrick D. Tobia
Partner, Trenk Isabel Siddiqi

When workplace discipline declines, HR must act quickly and consistently to restore standards.

Start by reviewing and clearly communicating company policies so employees understand expectations and consequences.

Conduct refresher training for supervisors to ensure fair and consistent enforcement.

Address issues promptly through documented corrective action: verbal warnings, written notices, or performance plans as appropriate.

Encourage accountability by recognizing positive behavior and addressing misconduct immediately.

Strengthen communication channels so employees feel heard and supported, reducing frustration that can lead to rule-breaking.

Finally, evaluate whether workplace culture, leadership practices, or unclear procedures are contributing to the decline, and implement targeted improvements.

A balanced approach of fairness, transparency, and consistency is key to rebuilding discipline and morale.

Consistent Policies Restore Workplace Standards

Najeeb Khan
Head of Training & Events, Teamland

When discipline starts to decline, it’s often a symptom of disengagement, not defiance.

Instead of defaulting to stricter policies, HR should reestablish clarity, accountability, and connection.

Start by reinforcing shared values through transparent communication and consistent feedback loops.

Create opportunities for employees to feel ownership, peer-led accountability circles, and team-based goals work well.

When people feel part of something bigger, discipline naturally follows

Shared Values Spark Natural Accountability

Devin Miller
CEO of SecureSave

One of the biggest drivers of disengaged employees is stress.

Short term money matters have long been one of the biggest drivers of stress for employees.

When this financial stress shows up at work, it leads to turnover and lost hours.

Our research at SecureSave shows that a workplace emergency savings program is a highly effective way to turn that around.

Workplace ESAs can have incredibly high adoption rates and research shows that employees with even a few hundred dollars of emergency savings are more productive, less likely to miss work and less likely to look for a new job.

Emergency Savings Ease Stress, Boost Discipline

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights:
https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article:
https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client:
https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions


Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

Recent Posts

Discover the latest HR Tips and trends with our weekly newsletters!