Menu

HRTips

Innovative Recruitment: Insights to Assist Mid-Career Shifts

by

Innovative Recruitment: Insights to Assist Mid-Career Shifts

Driven by accelerated technological advancements and shifting employee aspirations, the modern workplace is evolving at an unprecedented pace. 

Consequently, organizations heading into this dynamic era face a distinct challenge: effectively recruiting mid-career professionals who are deliberately changing their career paths. 

This valuable and expanding talent pool offers a rich blend of transferable skills, fresh perspectives, and a solid work ethic, yet many companies struggle with their efficient recruitment and integration. 

The vital question becomes: How can hiring strategies truly adapt to authentically attract and successfully onboard these skilled individuals navigating new professional journeys?

This piece compiles pivotal insights from leading business and HR authorities. 

It provides a strategic framework specifically designed for organizations aiming to harness this frequently overlooked workforce segment. 

Through its pages, readers will discover innovative approaches to identify, engage, and empower mid-career shifters, establishing them as key contributors to organizational growth and disruptive innovation.”

Read on!

Andy Danec
Owner, Ridgeline Recovery LLC

Andy Danec

If you’re looking to recruit professionals making a mid-career shift, the best strategy I can recommend is this: hire for heart, train for skill.

At Ridgeline Recovery, some of our strongest team members didn’t come from traditional behavioral health backgrounds. They came from teaching, nursing, the military—even corporate sales. What they had in common wasn’t credentials—it was a deep desire to do meaningful work.

When someone’s changing careers mid-stream, they’re not looking for another job. They’re looking for purpose. That’s your in. Write your job postings like you’re speaking to that person—the one who’s sitting at their desk wondering if their work will ever actually matter.

Instead of listing every bullet-pointed qualification, talk about the mission. The impact. The kind of emotional stamina it takes to walk with someone through addiction. Be brutally honest about the hard parts—but crystal clear about why it’s worth it.

We also created what we call a “Bridge Role”—an entry-level clinical support position that allows mid-career applicants to shadow therapists, assist with group facilitation, and learn the ropes while getting paid. Some go on to certification, some stay in support roles—but they all contribute meaningfully.

One of our best counselors right now was a restaurant manager three years ago. She told me, “I used to serve people food. Now I get to help them save their lives.” That’s the power of seeing beyond resumes.

Here’s the bottom line: mid-career professionals bring life experience, emotional intelligence, and perspective you can’t teach. But only if you give them a door that’s actually open.

Michael Yerardi
Founder & CEO, Turning Point Home Buyers

Michael Yerardi

To attract talented professionals making mid-career shifts, organizations should focus on a recruitment strategy that highlights flexibility, transferable skills, and growth opportunities.

Start by crafting job descriptions that emphasize skills over rigid experience requirements, showcasing how diverse backgrounds can add value. Build a strong employer brand that appeals to career changers by promoting stories of successful transitions within the company.

Offer tailored onboarding and upskilling programs to bridge knowledge gaps and demonstrate a commitment to their growth. Leverage platforms like LinkedIn to target professionals exploring new industries, and partner with career transition networks or bootcamps to access motivated, skilled candidates.

Steve Schwab
CEO, Casago

Steve Schwab

Ask them why they want to make that mid-career shift.

If they don’t have the technical skills or experience for the role that you might normally require, try to understand what their goals are and why.

They may be the best candidate based on their goals alone, but they might not be able to express that fully in their resume.

Ansh Arora
CEO, InspiringLADS

Ansh Arora

With industries evolving, professionals are evolving, seeking greater purpose, flexibility, growth, and rethinking their positions. Recruiting mid-level managers needs more than a job posting. It requires a strategic shift in how organizations place themselves in the competitive industries today.

Mid-level professionals are not looking to start over; rather, they are searching to pivot forward. Instead of matching rigid lists of requirements, organizations should emphasize learning potential, strategic impact, and upcoming opportunities. These pathways allow professionals to learn while earning satisfaction and reducing friction.

At this stage, soft skills outweigh hard skills, introducing an ability to lead, learn, and adapt quickly. Companies that invest in mentorship, continuous learning, and internal mobility attract these mid-level professionals pivoting with purpose.

Samantha Stuart
Co-Founder, Magic City Pest Control

Samantha Stuart

I moved our hiring process away from resume screening and toward a one-day challenge, where mid-career candidates complete a short version of the job’s core tasks and then present their results to the team. By observing how they apply their transferable skills in a low-stakes setting, we can cut through background assumptions and focus on their actual problem-solving ability.

Within a week of launching this, our applicant pool expanded to include individuals from teaching, event management, and operations, all bringing fresh perspectives that we’d have otherwise overlooked.

One standout hire was a former nonprofit program manager who crushed our four-hour media-outreach case study during her challenge day. Her pitch not only nailed our brand voice but introduced an idea we’d never tried—partnering with micro-influencers for local events, which drove a 10% bump in event attendance in her first quarter.

That real-work snapshot didn’t just predict on-the-job performance—it immediately fueled growth, so I recommend making your recruitment as hands-on and authentic as the day-to-day role itself.

Mike Fretto
Creative Director, Neighbor

Mike Fretto

Make sure that you are not basing your hiring solely on resumes. This can be a problem especially if you are using software to scan and rank applicants based on their resumes.

Those making mid-career shifts might not have experience in your specific industry or the role they are applying for, so that kind of technology can rank these candidates very low.

But, they may be excellent candidates with vast experience in other ways, making them dynamic hires. You might not be able to see how valuable they’d be without a conversational interview.

Emily van Eyssen
Founder, Remote Recruitment

Emily van Eyssen

When hiring professionals making mid-career shifts, the focus should be on transferable skills rather than rigid industry experience. These candidates often bring strong communication, leadership and problem-solving abilities that can add real value, even if their backgrounds differ from the norm.

To attract them, rewrite job descriptions to emphasise potential and learning mindset over direct experience. During interviews, use scenario-based questions that allow candidates to demonstrate how they approach challenges and adapt.

It also helps to offer clear training or onboarding support to build confidence in a new sector. Collaborating with reskilling programmes or tapping into professional networks that support career changers can expand your reach and bring in talent you might otherwise overlook.

John Baldino
President, Humareso

John Baldino

The hiring organization has to know deeply and remain committed to the competencies necessary for the role.

By working backwards from the current job description and those who are performing well in that role, a hiring manager can identify those skills and knowledge necessary to succeed.

Then, when screening mid-career candidates, the focus is on those translatable competencies.

Vanessa Anello
Corporate Trainer, Hacking HR

Vanessa Anello

One recruitment strategy I recommend for hiring mid-career professionals is building a sort of Shift Fluency Index.

Hiring managers look for a clean title match too much. What they actually need is someone who can translate core capabilities into new contexts.

A Shift Fluency Index evaluates candidates on factors like transferable behaviors, systems thinking, and also learning velocity. It draws from real indicators, not just job titles.

This approach really speeds up hiring for roles that require fresh thinking. It improves quality-of-hire by prioritizing adaptability, and increases diversity by removing linear career bias. It’s especially valuable for evolving organizations where complexity and reinvention are the norm.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Leading with Intent: Unpacking the Habits Shaping Modern Leadership

by

Leading with Intent: Unpacking the Habits Shaping Modern Leadership

Leadership today demands remarkable flexibility and self-awareness, driven by swift technological progress, changing employee expectations, and intricate global challenges. 

Success as a leader now relies not just on embracing new behaviors but also on purposefully letting go of obsolete practices. 

This deliberate shift profoundly shapes team interactions, organizational culture, and overall business performance. 

What specific habits have leading executives and HR professionals chosen to discard, and which new ones have they intentionally adopted? 

This article distills their critical experiences, offering a practical roadmap for thought leaders and influencers seeking to enhance their leadership style and drive meaningful transformation in their organizations.

Read on!

Ben Richardson
Owner, Acuity Training

Ben Richardson

I no longer made up my mind in a hurry without consulting my team. In the beginning, I believed that fast decisions would ensure that things progress, but on many occasions, it resulted in several oversights and lost opportunities.

When I learnt to give the team time and listen to their ideas, I began making better decisions. As a result of this change, the team felt more appreciated and the overall decision making process became more agreeable and thus the outcomes were enhanced.

I also made it a habit to concentrate on long-term development rather than just short-term outcomes. I began actively engaging in the team’s growth through training and helpful criticism rather to just taking care of the daily responsibilities.

The impact of this adjustment was significant. The team became more driven, self-assured, and prepared to take on more difficult tasks. Performance and general morale significantly improved as a result.

Robbin Schuchmann
Co-founder & HR Professional, EOR Overview

Robbin Schuchmann

I altered my micromanaging ways, and this was one of the best choices I made. I used to believe that participation in every small moment would mean smooth progress. However, it proved to be time-consuming and caused frustrations to my staff. They felt like having more responsibility and I was keeping them down.

Rather, I took a deliberate step towards trusting my team. I had developed the expectations and provided them with the autonomy to come up with decisions. The shift was absolutely instant. They became more responsible at work, which resulted in rapid decision-making, more adequate problem-solving, and the very feeling that they were sure about their jobs.

This gave a boost in productivity and more motivation to the team. I was able to concentrate more on the larger picture which facilitated the growth of the business. The immediate effect? Better efficiency, increased team dynamics and improved overall results.

Zach Shepard
Principal, Braddock Investment Group Inc

Zach Shepard

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was micromanaging. While it came from a place of wanting to ensure quality, it stifled creativity and trust within the team. Instead, I intentionally adopted the habit of delegating with clarity and trust, providing clear expectations and then stepping back to let team members take ownership.

The direct outcome was a noticeable boost in team morale, productivity, and innovation, as people felt more empowered and confident in their roles.

Gena B. McCown
Author, Speaker, Leadership Expert, Lead Her with Purpose

Gena B. McCown

One leadership habit I consciously dropped in recent years was overscheduling myself. Pre-2020, my calendar was a nonstop stream of meetings, tasks, and commitments. I was leaving zero margin for rest, reflection, or flexibility.

When the world shut down during COVID-19, that packed calendar went silent. And in that silence, I realized how unhealthy and unsustainable my pace had been.

As things reopened, I made a deliberate choice: not everything was invited back to my calendar.

Now, I’m more intentional about what I say yes to. I build in white space, protect my energy, and make thoughtful commitments.

The direct outcome? Improved mental clarity, better decision-making, and most importantly, a healthier team culture.

By modeling margin, I’m giving others permission to do the same. Rest isn’t a weakness, it’s wisdom.

Freeing up my time allowed me to pick up a new habit of continual learning. I began investing time in Coursera and LinkedIn Learning modules are often free, always valuable.

As a leader, it’s easy to focus so much on teaching that we forget to keep learning.

This shift has helped me stay sharp, curious, and relevant. I bring fresher ideas to the table and demonstrate that growth doesn’t have an expiration date, regardless of career stage.

Miriam Groom
CEO, Mindful Career Coaching

Miriam Groom

As someone who coaches leaders navigating change—whether personal or organizational—I’ve come to realize that leadership isn’t just about acquiring new habits. It’s just as much about letting go of outdated ones.

Over the past few years, as the workplace evolved through uncertainty, remote dynamics, and greater calls for inclusivity, I made a deliberate shift in how I lead. It involved letting go of performative productivity and embracing intentional vulnerability.

For years, I operated under a habit many leaders unconsciously adopt: hyper-responsiveness as proof of effectiveness. I answered emails late at night, stayed visible on Slack during every waking hour, and prided myself on being the first in and last out. At the time, I thought this demonstrated commitment.

What I dropped was this constant availability. I stopped glorifying myself. I began blocking time to think, giving slower, more thoughtful responses, and encouraging boundaries. This wasn’t easy—especially in an age where overcommunication is mistaken for leadership.

In place of that old habit, I adopted a new one: modeling vulnerability and curiosity, especially when I don’t have all the answers. Rather than making polished speeches or pretending to have a five-year plan when things felt uncertain, I started saying things like, “I’m not sure yet, but I’d love your thoughts,” or “Here’s what I’m wrestling with.” I began opening team meetings with check-in questions that weren’t just about KPIs, but about what people needed to feel supported. I even started sharing personal growth challenges in 1:1s—whether it was around public speaking anxiety or evolving my own blind spots on equity and inclusion.

In my own team, I implemented “fail-forward Fridays,” a space where we share what didn’t go as planned that week. The point isn’t to fix it—but to normalize setbacks as part of growth. That one habit boosted psychological safety so much that even new hires speak up sooner and contribute creatively earlier in their onboarding cycle.

Dropping the habit of always being “on” and embracing intentional vulnerability transformed how I lead. It reminded me that leadership isn’t about being infallible—it’s about being real, creating space for others to show up fully, and trusting that empowerment is more powerful than control. In doing so, I didn’t lose authority—I gained influence. And more importantly, I built a culture where others could lead alongside me, not beneath me.

Christopher Farley
Owner, Flippin’ Awesome Adventures

Christopher Farley

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was trying to handle everything myself. I used to think I was being a supportive leader by taking on extra tasks to help the team, but really it just left me burned out and didn’t give others a chance to step up.

The habit I intentionally adopted was holding weekly check-ins with each team member. These are quick 15 to 20-minute meetings where we talk about their progress, roadblocks, and goals, but also check in on how they’re feeling in general.

The direct outcome has been huge. Team members feel more supported, communication is clearer, and I can catch small issues before they turn into bigger problems. Plus, it’s helped me delegate more effectively because I know exactly where everyone stands. Overall, it’s created a stronger sense of trust and accountability on the team.

Joe Spisak
CEO, Fulfill

Joe Spisak

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was micromanagement. Early in my career at Zapiy.com, I believed being deeply involved in every detail demonstrated commitment. I resisted when my business coach advised delegating more aggressively—even tasks I thought only I could handle well. I was hesitant to give up control, fearing it might compromise quality.

The shift happened gradually. I realized that by holding too tightly to operational decisions, I was creating bottlenecks and limiting our growth potential. More importantly, I was preventing team members from developing their capabilities. When I finally stepped back and empowered my team with meaningful responsibility, not only did they rise to the occasion, but our organization became more nimble and innovative.

Conversely, I’ve intentionally adopted data-driven decision making. The 3PL industry has traditionally operated on relationships and gut feelings. Coming from tech, I knew there was tremendous opportunity in bringing analytical rigor to fulfillment.

We’ve transformed how we match eCommerce businesses with 3PL partners by building sophisticated data models that quantify performance metrics and predict costs with remarkable accuracy—92% in many cases. For instance, we helped Kiss My Keto identify inefficiencies in carrier selection through data analysis, reducing their carrier rates by 41% for heavier packages and saving hundreds of thousands annually.

The outcome of these leadership changes has been transformative. Delegating has freed me to focus on strategic growth while cultivating a more capable team. Meanwhile, our data-driven approach has revolutionized how we create value in an industry that was ripe for innovation. Together, these shifts have allowed us to scale while delivering measurable ROI for our clients.

Travis Rieken
Sr. Director of Product Management, Easy Ice

Travis Rieken

I stopped answering too quickly.

I used to jump in with solutions the moment a problem came up. It felt efficient, but it shut down the conversation. Teams held back their ideas. Decisions moved fast but often missed better options. I changed that habit. I started listening longer, letting others share their thoughts first.

That shift led to stronger discussions. People spoke up more. They took more responsibility. Outcomes improved because ideas were pressure-tested, not just followed.

I focused more on clarity than control. Instead of trying to guide every move, I worked to make priorities obvious. When people understand what matters, they align faster. That shift helped us avoid wasted effort and made it easier to adjust when things changed.

Clear goals gave the team confidence to make the right calls without waiting for approval. The result was fewer delays and tighter focus across the board.

Leadership habits either block progress or make room for it. Letting go of control and focusing on clarity shifted how the team moved. That created better results without adding pressure.

Colin Potts
Chief Operating Officer, Regenerative Orthopedics & Sports Medicine

Colin Potts

Leadership Habit Shift: Dropping the Micromanagement and Adopting Active Listening

As a leader, it’s tempting to be involved in every detail, especially when you care deeply about the work that is being done. But in recent years, I have dropped my habit of micromanaging everything. I realized that this approach stifles creativity and trust within the team.

By trying to control everything, I was not allowing others to step up and prove their abilities through what they could do. The direct outcome was a healthier work culture; employees felt more empowered, and our productivity increased as a result of that.

But simultaneously, I replace the habit of micromanagement with active listening. I now try to listen to the different perspectives my team offers instead of jumping straight to solutions. This helped promote a culture of open communication throughout the organization while strengthening my relationship with my team.

They now feel more heard and valued which fosters a more collaborative and innovative environment. The outcomes of these changes were amazing; we now achieve better results with a more engaged and highly motivated team.

Sometimes leadership is not about doing more, it’s about doing less and allowing the strengths of your team to shine. I now feel like a more effective leader who is focused on long-term success and one who fosters a culture of trust simply by learning the importance of active listening and getting rid of micromanagement.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Conscious Leadership: Refining Habits for Leadership Impact

by

Conscious Leadership: Refining Habits for Leadership Impact

Leadership in today’s organizational structure demands an unparalleled level of adaptability and self-awareness.

The rapid pace of technological change, evolving workforce expectations, and global complexities necessitate a continuous re-evaluation of ingrained practices.

For leaders, true effectiveness now hinges not just on what new habits they adopt, but also on which long-standing ones they consciously shed.

This transformative process, driven by intentionality, profoundly impacts team dynamics, organizational culture, and ultimately, business outcomes.

What specific leadership habits have prominent business executives and HR professionals consciously dropped, and which new ones have they intentionally cultivated?

This HR Spotlight article distills their invaluable experiences, offering a strategic blueprint for thought leaders and authorities seeking to refine their own leadership approach and drive meaningful change within their organizations.

Read on!

Niclas Schlopsna
Managing Consultant & CEO, spectup

Niclas Schlopsna

I stopped micromanaging. In the early days at Spectup, especially when we scaled our offerings beyond pitch decks, I had this habit of reviewing everything—slides, emails, even internal memos. It came from a good place, but it slowed things down and made the team overly reliant on my sign-off.

At one point, one of our team members casually asked if she should send me her calendar invite before scheduling a client call—and that was the moment I realized how far I’d taken it.

What I adopted instead was structured delegation with accountability. I started trusting people more, giving them clearer ownership and room to make decisions, but with measurable outcomes tied to each initiative.

That shift directly freed up my time to focus on higher-impact partnerships and product strategy. It also created a stronger culture—people at Spectup began taking more initiative, and client satisfaction noticeably improved because decisions were made faster. Letting go felt risky at first, but it’s one of the best leadership habits I’ve built.

Jamie Frew
CEO, Carepatron

Jamie Frew

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was always needing to have the answers. Early on, I felt pressure to jump in, solve problems fast, and give clear direction on everything. But over time, I saw that it was limiting the team. It made decisions flow through me and slowed down momentum.

The habit I adopted instead was asking better questions. I started asking things like “What do you think is the best next move?” or “What’s the outcome we’re aiming for here?”

That shift gave people more autonomy to us at Carepatron. It created space for better thinking, better solutions, and faster growth. People started making stronger decisions without needing constant input. They took more initiative, and the whole team moved with more confidence.

Shishir Khedkar
Head of Engineering, scoredata

Shishir Khedkar

Here is one habit I dropped and another one that I adopted intentionally.

Always Having the Answer: Why I dropped it: For a long time, I was under the assumption that strong leadership meant being the smartest person in the room—having quick answers to every question. It fed my ego, but quietly stifled team growth. I realized this “heroic” leadership style unintentionally made others hesitant to speak up or take initiative.

Instead, I actively changed to respond with questions like, “What do you think?” or “How would you approach it?” to create space for others to lead. I also instilled and embraced the attitude of asking my team members to come to me with options to their questions to foster independent thinking.

As a result of this, it transformed the team dynamic. Engagement increased, problem-solving became more collaborative, and people took more ownership. It also freed up my mental bandwidth to focus on strategy rather than tactical firefighting.

Adopted candid feedback on a regular basis. Why I adopted it: I used to think feedback was something formal—annual reviews, structured surveys. But I noticed high-performing teams had a constant rhythm of open feedback, both top-down and bottom-up.

I introduced short, informal check-ins and encouraged a culture of “feedback in the moment”. I also modeled vulnerability by asking, “What’s one thing I could do better this week?” and “How can I help you do your job better?” during my one-on-one meetings.

What happened was amazing. Trust deepened. Team performance improved because course corrections happened in real time. It also made me more coachable and aware of blind spots I didn’t know I had.

In summary: Letting go of the need to always have the answer empowered others, and it allowed me to practice a “continuous learning” mode. Embracing ongoing feedback made the whole team, including myself, sharper and more adaptive.

Joe Horan
Owner & CEO, Jumper Bee

Joe Horan

I dropped the habit of stepping into every decision. For a long time, I believed staying involved in each task meant staying in control. What it did was slow people down. It created hesitation. Team members waited instead of moving.

I was blocking their growth. Letting go felt risky at first, but the results proved otherwise. People started owning their roles. They moved quickly. They solved issues without checking in. The overall pace picked up, and accountability improved across the board.

I picked up clarity. I started focusing on setting direction, not controlling movement. I made sure everyone knew the goals and priorities for the week. It didn’t need to be complicated—just clear. Once the team understood where we were going, they started making better calls without waiting. Communication got easier. The day-to-day became smoother.

Dropping control and adding clarity changed how I lead. It gave the team space to grow and gave me time to focus on bigger decisions. Leadership shifted from managing tasks to building trust. The team became faster, sharper, and more independent. The company moved forward without constant supervision. That shift made the biggest difference.

Vikrant Bhalodia
Head of Marketing & People Ops, WeblineIndia

Vikrant Bhalodia

A leadership habit I consciously dropped was being the “fixer” in every situation. I used to step in too quickly whenever there was a roadblock, thinking I was helping. In reality, I was unintentionally slowing down the team’s growth and decision-making confidence.

Letting go of that habit wasn’t easy, but I started asking more questions instead of giving answers, pushing people to think through their own solutions. It shifted accountability and built a stronger sense of ownership across the board.

What I intentionally adopted was carving out weekly one-on-ones that are strictly non-operational: no project updates, no task lists. Just space for open dialogue, feedback, career goals, or even just a venting session.

That habit alone created a deeper trust and gave me early visibility into morale shifts I would’ve otherwise missed. And it’s helped with retention more than any formal engagement initiative.

George Fironov
Co-Founder & CEO, Talmatic

George Fironov

I forgot about such things as micromanaging because it created bottlenecks and decreased team ownership. Instead, I intentionally developed a habit of setting clear expectations and trusting that the team would execute.

And as a result, decision-making speeded up, team members gained confidence, and overall project outcomes were improved with fewer controls.

Betsy Pepine
Owner & Real Estate Broker, Pepine Realty

Betsy Pepine

I dropped the habit of controlling every decision. I believed strong leadership meant staying involved in each choice and guiding every step. That habit slowed growth. Others waited for direction instead of acting.

I adopted the habit of stepping back. I trusted people to handle challenges. I listened more and spoke less. The result: faster progress, stronger teamwork, more confidence across the board. People learned from mistakes, found solutions, and took pride in their work.

Strong leadership builds others. Letting go of control created space for new leaders to rise and the team to grow stronger together.

Tia Smith
CEO & Founder, Ignite Consulting

Tia Smith

One leadership habit I dropped in recent years: over-functioning.

For most of my career, I equated leadership with being the one who always had the answer, carried the weight, and picked up the slack. I was the “fixer”—the person others relied on when things got messy. Promotions came. Praise followed. And so did burnout.

Over-functioning masquerades as excellence, but it’s really a trust issue in disguise. I didn’t realize how much I was robbing others of growth until I started stepping back. Delegating isn’t about lightening your load—it’s about raising the ceiling for the whole team.

Over time, I saw my team step up in ways I hadn’t anticipated. Fully. Authentically. One employee took the lead on two initiatives I had always owned and absolutely crushed it. Another pitched a bold idea I never would’ve considered—and it worked. Turns out, when you stop doing it all, people don’t drop the ball. They rise.

One leadership habit I adopted: listening longer. Not active listening. Not empathetic nodding. I mean intentionally holding space without rushing to solution, reaction, or resolution. It sounds simple—but it was a massive recalibration for someone wired to move fast and solve things.

Especially in the culture and people space, what someone isn’t saying is often more important than what they are. Learning to listen for hesitation, pattern, or fatigue under the surface has helped me lead with greater precision—and greater humanity.

It’s harder than it sounds. Especially when you’ve been trained to solve, fix, respond. But listening like this changes things. It deepens trust. It reveals the real issues, not just the polished ones. It invites honesty—not just with others, but with yourself.

That single habit—staying quiet a little longer—has changed how I coach, consult, and lead. It’s helped me hear beneath the noise, to the signal that really matters.

Sometimes the most powerful shift in leadership isn’t something new we add. It’s something we’re finally willing to release.

Nick Vitucci
Head of Marketing, Declare Media

Nick Vitucci

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was feeling the need to have all the answers. Early on, I thought leading meant solving every problem myself, but it led to burnout and bottlenecks. Instead, I adopted a habit of asking better questions and letting the team take more ownership in decision-making.

This shift empowered others to step up, sparked better ideas, and created a stronger sense of shared accountability. As a direct result, our workflow became smoother, team morale improved, and we started delivering projects faster with more creativity and confidence.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Beyond the Usual: Strategic Recruitment for Mid-Career Professionals

by

Beyond the Usual: Strategic Recruitment for Mid-Career Professionals

The professional landscape is characterized by rapid shifts influenced by several factors, in turn inspiring a growing desire for career re-alignment. 

In this environment, a significant and increasingly valuable talent pool is emerging: experienced professionals making deliberate mid-career shifts. 

These individuals bring a wealth of transferable skills, diverse perspectives, and a proven work ethic, yet many organizations struggle to effectively identify and integrate them. 

How can recruitment strategies evolve to authentically attract and successfully onboard these talented professionals who are charting new career courses? 

This HR Spotlight article distills critical insights from leading business executives and seasoned HR professionals, offering a strategic blueprint for organizations ready to tap into this rich, often overlooked, segment of the workforce. 

Dive in to explore innovative approaches to identify, engage, and empower mid-career shifters, ensuring they become valuable catalysts for organizational growth and innovation.

Read on!

Margaret Buj
Principal Recruiter, Mixmax

Focus on Transferable Skills, Potential, and Coachability

When hiring talented professionals making mid-career shifts, your recruitment strategy needs to focus less on rigid credentials and more on transferable skills, potential, and coachability. Too many companies still default to checklist hiring – screening for specific industry experience or tools, which risks overlooking excellent candidates eager to grow.

Here’s what I recommend:

Rethink your job descriptions: Instead of long lists of required experiences, focus on the core competencies needed for success. Use language that welcomes career changers – for example: “Experience in [related skills] valued – we welcome applicants with diverse backgrounds.”

Train hiring managers to spot transferable skills: Many managers are used to looking for a linear career path. Upskill them to assess competencies like adaptability, learning agility, problem-solving, stakeholder management – qualities that often matter more than deep domain expertise in mid-career hires.

Redesign your interview process: Include situational and behavioural questions that allow candidates to show how their prior experience applies to your context. A rigid technical screen won’t serve you here — what you want to understand is how the person learns and solves problems.

Prioritise learning potential and growth mindset: Research shows that curiosity and learning agility are strong predictors of long-term success, especially for those making career pivots. Create space in your hiring process to evaluate these attributes.

Offer structured onboarding and development: Mid-career changers may need ramp-up support to close specific knowledge gaps. Build this into your onboarding and early development plans — it will pay off in faster time-to-productivity and retention.

The companies that do this well end up with stronger, more diverse teams – and they gain access to talent pools their competitors overlook. In today’s evolving market, that’s a real advantage.

Tulika Tripathi
Founder & CEO, Snaphunt

Hire for Competencies, Not Past Experience

When organizations are evolving to hire talented professionals making mid-career shifts, the most effective strategy I recommend is to hire for competencies and motivations rather than relying on past experience.

In my over 20 years of experience within recruitment, I have seen firsthand how often candidates are dismissed purely on the basis of “CV fit.” This reflex to screen out rather than look deeper is one of the biggest obstacles to hiring people with the potential to excel in a new field.

The reality is, we’re in a time of unprecedented change. Industries are being reinvented, technologies are reshaping roles, and the challenges companies face tomorrow will look nothing like those they faced yesterday. In fact, that is precisely why organizations are seeking professionals making mid-career shifts: they bring fresh thinking, diverse perspectives, and the courage to adapt.

Past experience alone no longer defines future success. What matters is learning agility, problem-solving ability, and the intrinsic motivation to grow.

I’ve found that the most impactful recruitment strategies start by designing selection processes that truly assess these qualities, through structured interviews, scenario-based exercises, and conversations that go beyond the resume to understand who the candidate is becoming.

Hiring in this context isn’t about ticking boxes but rather about recognizing potential. And when you get it right, you don’t just fill a role, you bring in someone who can help your organization grow and thrive.

Niclas Schlopsna
Managing Consultant & CEO, spectup

Purpose and Respect Trump Perks for Mid-Career Hires

When we worked with a client transitioning their hiring strategy to attract mid-career professionals, the biggest shift wasn’t in where they sourced talent, but in how they told their story.

Mid-career folks aren’t dazzled by ping-pong tables or beer Fridays—they care about purpose, growth, and being respected for what they already bring. I advised that client to revamp job descriptions to emphasize impact and autonomy instead of a long checklist of requirements. At spectup, we’ve seen better traction when the messaging reflects mutual learning, not just upskilling one-sidedly.

We also encouraged them to design interview processes that don’t feel like exams. For example, one candidate told me afterward that being asked how they’d redesign a process—rather than being grilled about past roles—was what won them over. That input came from one of our team members who spotted the disconnect early. Tailored onboarding is also critical. These hires aren’t fresh grads—they want a clear runway and trust from day one, not hand-holding.

Finally, your current team has to buy into this shift. We’ve helped clients run internal workshops to align hiring managers with the new direction. The goal is not just to bring in great people but to make sure they’re walking into a culture that values their decision to pivot.

Vikrant Bhalodia
Head of Marketing & People Ops, WeblineIndia

Peer-Led Hiring Loops Connect Mid-Career Talent

When hiring mid-career professionals, we’re not just filling roles; we are evolving the team. These candidates usually aren’t chasing perks; they’re looking for purpose, meaningful impact, and long-term stability.

One approach we’ve found effective is peer-led hiring loops. Instead of keeping evaluations limited to managers, we involve team members who’ve themselves transitioned mid-career. This creates a more empathetic and grounded conversation, and it helps candidates feel seen, not judged.

We also avoid generic job descriptions. Instead, we work closely with team leads to shape role narratives around real challenges the person will solve. Mid-career candidates want to know how their past work translates to your current needs.

And in that first interview, we focus on the person, not a checklist. Let them share their story. That’s where their value usually shows up beyond the resume.

David Zhang
CEO, Kate Backdrops

Design Roles That Leverage Transferable Skills

To attract talented professionals making mid-career shifts, focus on crafting a strategy that highlights your organization’s adaptability, growth opportunities, and culture. First, ensure your roles are designed to leverage transferable skills while offering robust training for knowledge gaps.

Develop a strong employer brand that resonates with professionals seeking purpose and progress. Simplify the hiring process—streamline applications and provide clear communication. Finally, focus on culture—show mid-career candidates that your workplace values diverse experiences and enables meaningful contributions. It’s all about showing them a clear path to thrive with you.

Michelle Garrison
Event Tech & AI Strategist, We & Goliath

Fresh Perspectives Over Experience Attract Career Changers

I’d say focus on showcasing your company’s appetite for fresh perspectives rather than just experience—this resonates deeply with career changers. When I transitioned from recruiting to founding my own event agency, what drew me to certain opportunities was hearing “we want someone who thinks differently about this challenge.”

I remember one potential client who said they specifically wanted someone without a traditional event planning background, which felt counterintuitive but made perfect sense. Mid-career switchers often bring this same valuable outsider perspective. Create job descriptions that emphasize how different industry experience could benefit your specific challenges.

Maybe phrase it as “seeking someone with customer service background to reimagine our client onboarding” instead of “5+ years marketing experience required.” This approach has helped us attract talented people who might have self-selected out of traditional postings. The results speak for themselves.

George Fironov
Co-Founder & CEO, Talmatic

Skills-Based Recruitment Trumps Linear Career Progression

I have been working in recruiting so long that I can recommend highlighting skills-based recruitment above sticking to sector background or linear career progression screening.

Mid-career professionals possess transferrable skills, versatility, and maturity that often replace domain experience. Practical testing, project interviews, and open upskilling routes ensure that these people are able to demonstrate their value and move in smoothly.

Patrick Regan
Senior Recruitment Consultant, Enlighten Supply Pool

Value Alignment Outweighs Direct Industry Experience

For an organisation targeting professionals making mid-career shifts, the recruitment strategy should focus on value alignment, transferable skills, and support for transition. Start by crafting job descriptions that emphasise purpose, impact, and growth, rather than rigid experience requirements.

Highlight training, mentorship, and career development pathways in your employer branding to reassure career changers. Leverage platforms like LinkedIn and industry forums to engage with professionals in adjacent fields, and run targeted campaigns showcasing real stories of successful transitions. Adapt your selection process to assess adaptability, problem-solving, and mindset over direct industry experience. Host career change webinars, Q&A sessions, or open days to build trust and familiarity.

Finally, collaborate with organisations offering reskilling or upskilling programs, and offer flexible onboarding that bridges any knowledge gaps—creating a genuinely inclusive pathway for mid-career talent to thrive in a new professional context.

Annette Garsteck
Founder, Career Reinvention Coach, Annette Garsteck Career Consulting

Employee Referrals Unlock Top Mid-Career Talent

The motivated and successful mid-career professionals your organization needs are likely already in your organization’s orbit. The best way to find them? Offer a bonus to your employees for referring to their talented connections, friends, and former colleagues.

To secure the best referrals, consider implementing a bonus structure with three payment installments that match key milestones: after the new hire’s first 90 days, after six months, and after their first year in the role. Incentivize your current team members to submit the best candidates by offering a multi-tiered bonus structure (potentially with more money for hard-to-fill or advanced skill positions).

The residual benefit of this approach is that you can telegraph to your workforce that your company is invested in hiring mid-life career professionals who are at the top of their game and ready for a change.

Nick Vitucci
Head of Marketing, Declare Media

Focus on Competencies, Not Industry Titles

For organizations hiring professionals making mid-career shifts, I recommend focusing on skills-based recruiting rather than relying heavily on traditional role experience. Start by rewriting job descriptions to highlight competencies, problem-solving ability, and adaptability over titles or years in a specific industry.

Pair that with structured interviews that include scenario-based questions relevant to real challenges in the role. Mid-career candidates often bring rich transferable experience, so showing openness to that builds trust and attracts stronger applicants.

Also, highlight mentorship, training, and growth opportunities in your recruitment messaging. It signals that your company invests in long-term success, not just short-term fit.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Analyzing a Toxic Tactic: Leaders on the Damage of Quiet Firing

by

Analyzing a Toxic Tactic: Leaders on the Damage of Quiet Firing

Quiet firing operates in the shadows of the workplace. 

Unlike a formal performance improvement plan, its signs are subtle and can be easily dismissed as managerial oversight—until the damage is done. 

A promising career stagnates, trust erodes, and a valuable employee silently disengages.

In the dynamic and often high-context work environment of today, the real danger of quiet firing lies in its ambiguity, which allows toxicity to fester and morale to decline long before it appears in attrition data. 

To create a field guide for the analysis of this toxic trait, we turned to seasoned HR experts and business leaders from across industries. 

Their responses provide a vital diagnostic toolkit for leaders to identify the repercussions of this destructive behavior before it’s too late.

Read on!

Robbin Schuchmann
Co-founder, EOR Overview

Robbin Schuchmann

The worst part of quiet firing for HR is that it completely breaks down trust in the company. When an employee feels like they are being quietly pushed out, they stop believing the company cares about them or their career.

From my experience helping companies hire people all over the world, this lack of trust makes it really hard to keep good employees and attract new ones.

Imagine an excellent engineer in another country who starts getting less work, fewer important projects and little communication. They sense what is happening and quietly start looking for another job. That person might spend two hours a day on job hunting while still getting paid, costing the company tens of thousands of dollars in lost work.

This story gets around, especially in tight knit global talent communities, making it much tougher to hire top people who want clear, supportive workplaces.

This broken trust does not just affect the person being quietly fired; it spreads throughout the entire company.

When others see someone being subtly pushed out, they start to worry it could happen to them too. This makes people less willing to try new things, share ideas, or truly invest in their jobs. Everyone becomes more cautious and less willing to work together, which stops new ideas and makes it harder for the company to grow in a competitive world.

If employee engagement drops by just 10% in a company of 100 people, it could mean a 15% drop in overall team work in six months. This is a direct result of a workforce that no longer trusts its leadership.

Sarah Williams
Founder & Principal, Recruit Healthcare

Sarah Williams

As a healthcare recruiter, I’ve gained a lot of insight into the mindset of someone who’s been quietly fired. These candidates are often more shaken and confused than those who were formally let go. They’re left with unanswered questions, low confidence, and no clear sense of closure.

But that’s not the company’s problem, right?

Actually, it is. Once quiet firing begins at an organization, I’ve seen turnover spike almost every time.

Employees feel the cultural shift. The lack of transparency creates tension and anxiety. Even those not directly affected start quietly planning their exits — just in case.

The long-term impact is hard to ignore. Companies that lean on quiet firing don’t just lose underperformers — they lose top talent too. And the reputational damage follows. Candidates talk, and word spreads quickly in close-knit sectors like healthcare.

Wynter Johnson
Founder & CEO, Caily

Wynter Johnson

The real issue with quiet firing is that the people you quiet fire stick around and damage the morale of the rest of your team.

Even if you work to keep them isolated from the rest of the team, word is going to get out, and any kind of non-explanation is only going to raise more questions than answers.

This is why working to improve the performance of your struggling workers is a much better use of resources.

Joe Sagrilla
CEO & Principal Consultant, Horizon Business Consulting LLC

Joe Sagrilla

The most detrimental effect of quiet firing is the demoralization and potential loss of top performers.

Quiet firing, where employees are subtly sidelined to spur resignation, often takes far longer than managers anticipate—often stretching over several months—and this prolonged timeline drives significant talent risks.

The extended process creates visible inequities and prolonged periods of additional burden for high performers.

First, high performers notice double standards as sidelined employees, disengaged by managers and given lighter workloads or lower expectations, linger as deadweight. This forces top talent to shoulder extra responsibilities on critical activities and projects, breeding frustration.

Per Price’s Law, about 10% of employees generate 50% of productive outcomes, so overall attrition pales compared to losing these stars.

Consequently, the erosion of fairness undermines trust in leadership, sapping morale. Disillusioned, high performers may seek opportunities elsewhere, crippling organizational success.

Organizations with clear performance targets and reliable feedback excel at rewarding top talent and humanely exiting underperformers after fair coaching.

Vanessa Anello
Certificate Programs Facilitator & Strategist, hackinghr

Vanessa Anello

In our certificate programs at Hacking HR, we’ve seen that when employees stop getting feedback or growth opportunities, they don’t feel neutral, they just feel pushed out.

They stay in the job, but they stop giving their best. Even worse, a lot of times they tell others not to bother trying either.

Quiet firing spreads quiet quitting.

It builds a culture where people believe effort doesn’t matter and silence means you’ve already failed.

That kind of mindset is hard to undo.

Carr Lanphier
CEO, Improovy

Carr Lanphier

Quiet firing sets a bad precedent for your company.

It demonstrates that your leadership team does not go about things in an honest, transparent way. They aren’t straightforward with employees, and they don’t want to be responsible for the hard things.

When your employees see your leadership team acting this way, it can make them very wary about their own job security, as well as whether or not their leaders actually respect them.

You want your business to be transparent, to communicate in a healthy manner, and to display respect toward every employee – even when firing them.

José Roberto Araujo
Founder, Wide Brazil

José Roberto Araujo

Quiet firing creates a blind spot. Because it’s silent by nature, companies often have no real visibility into what’s actually happening until the damage is already done — top performers disengaged, knowledge lost, team morale low.

It’s not just about someone leaving, it’s about everything that quietly breaks before that happens. Most managers don’t realize the impact until they’re dealing with bigger issues like turnover spikes or drops in performance.

From an HR standpoint, it makes it nearly impossible to act early or fix things proactively. One way to reduce this risk is to create space for honest feedback and routine check-ins — not just performance reviews, but real conversations.

Chris Brewer
Managing Director, Best Retreats

Chris Brewer

Sidelining a team member kills their drive. It spreads distrust, cuts productivity, and spikes turnover.

My fix?

Regular one-on-ones to catch issues early, like vetting a retreat for safety.

It’s simple: treat people like people, not dead weight.

Michael Yerardi
Founder & CEO, Turning Point Home Buyers

Michael Yerardi

Quiet firing, sometimes referred to as “stealth layoffs” or “discreet terminations,” can be one of the most harmful practices for company culture.

This approach involves terminating employees without formal announcements or acknowledgment, often as a strategy to cut costs. By sidestepping severance packages and legal fees associated with traditional layoffs, companies may view quiet firing as a financial shortcut.

However, this practice comes at a significant cost—eroding employee morale and creating a negative workplace environment that can ultimately hinder long-term success.

David Struogano
Managing Director & Mold Remediation Expert, Mold Removal Port St. Lucie

David Struogano

Avoidance as a management strategy invites chaos into the process.

Quiet firing does not just sideline a person—it destabilizes accountability across the team. Nobody knows who owns what anymore.

Colleagues work around the ignored employee, patching holes, adjusting timelines, double-checking basics. That drag shows up in hours, costs, errors. Every delay compounds.

You end up paying four people to indirectly fix what one person could have handled with proper guidance.

Even worse, you burn team morale. People start guessing what went wrong and who is next. Speculation replaces transparency.

That uncertainty steals their focus. People second-guess tasks, hold back honest feedback, hesitate during decisions.

Everyone slows down. Precision disappears.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

New DOL Overtime Rules: Top Implementation Challenges Across Industries

by

New DOL Overtime Rules: Top Implementation Challenges Across Industries

The U.S. Department of Labor’s new overtime rule marks a major shift in compensation policy, significantly raising the salary threshold for exempt status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

This change reclassifies millions of U.S. workers, granting them eligibility for overtime pay.

For HR teams, this goes beyond mere compliance—it poses a complex operational challenge with significant financial and cultural impacts. Implementation difficulties differ across sectors: a tech startup with a fluid, “always-on” work culture encounters distinct issues compared to a retail chain tasked with precisely tracking the duties of thousands of store workers.

Successfully managing this shift demands proactive planning and a keen awareness of potential obstacles.

To gain practical insights, we consulted a panel of experienced HR professionals and business leaders from various industries, asking:

“What is one implementation challenge HR teams might face in your industry when updating overtime pay due to recent legislative changes?”

Their responses offer a vital roadmap for organizations striving to comply with these regulations, highlighting critical challenges and strategic approaches for a seamless transition.

Read on!

Dr. Chad Walding
Co-Founder & Chief Culture Officer, NativePath

Dr. Chad Walding

HR teams may have issues keeping track of overtime for employees with non-standard schedules.

HR teams within the wellness and fitness industry may have employees work different hours based on their varying schedules, or other entities that they may have not accounted for because of competing client needs.

A good example of this are Wellness Coaches who may work both in-office and remote, which can make it difficult to track how many hours they actually work.

Making sure that they get fair overtime pay can be challenging to manage in an office with more changing schedules and aspects of work in an environment can make maintaining an efficient time tracking system more difficult, while still allowing your HR team to conduct payroll without having to worry too much about any other permissions, authorizations, or management approvals.

Edward Hones
Founder, Hones Law

Edward Hones

Misclassification Risks During Policy Changes: One major implementation challenge HR teams often face when updating overtime pay policies is accurately reclassifying employees under the new rules.

In the legal field, especially in small firms or nonprofit organizations, roles can be fluid, and titles don’t always align cleanly with FLSA standards.

When salary thresholds shift or duties tests are updated, HR may overlook employees who were borderline exempt, leading to misclassification. That exposes employers to serious liability, including back pay, penalties, and even class action risk.

Communication and Cultural Impact: Another challenge is how those changes are communicated internally. Reclassifying someone from exempt to non-exempt can feel like a demotion if not handled thoughtfully, especially in professional settings where employees value autonomy.

I’ve seen cases where firms failed to explain the change clearly, leading to morale issues and even retaliation claims.

HR needs to prepare not just for the policy shift, but for the human reaction to it, being proactive, transparent, and legally precise in how these updates are rolled out.

Adam Wagner
COO, Raindrop Agency

Adam Wagner

One challenge creative agencies will face is navigating overtime for hybrid and remote teams.

Tracking hours in a flexible work environment isn’t straightforward—especially when client needs don’t stick to a 9-to-5.

Creative work doesn’t always follow a punch clock, so aligning billable hours with actual hours worked while staying compliant will take tighter time-tracking systems and better manager training.

It’s not just about paying more—it’s about being precise and fair without crushing team morale.

Belize Hans Polloso
CEO, Dog Academic

Belize Hans Polloso

In the education technology sector, we’re facing a unique overtime implementation challenge that’s flying under the radar for many HR teams: properly classifying and tracking overtime for curriculum developers and instructional designers.

Just last quarter, we discovered that our curriculum team was routinely working evenings to meet seasonal program launches, but our systems weren’t capturing this properly because we’d historically treated these roles as fully exempt. The challenge isn’t just technical—it’s cultural. These passionate educators often don’t view their creative work as “overtime” but rather as dedication to quality.

The solution required both system updates and mindset shifts. We implemented project-based time tracking tools that integrate with our payroll system while hosting workshops to emphasize that proper compensation actually supports their creative work rather than commoditizing it.

Hasan Hanif
Founder, Colour Vistas

Hasan Hanif

In the case of HR teams in sectors such as mine, where there is a combination of both manual and digital operations, making an overtime pay transition can be hectic.

Among the key obstacles, the necessity to adjust all systems, whether accounting or operational, to the new regulations needs to be mentioned.

I recall the time I shifted my accounting job to establish Colour Vistas. We were expanding rapidly, and we needed to reconsider our payroll system, so it could accept new regulations without failing.

To the HR, particularly in an environment such as mine where time recording is both automatic and manual to some extent, the important thing is to extract the correct records. A simple error in hours classifications or tracking can be very expensive.

Ensuring that the entire team, including the people printing and packaging on the floor, are on the same page when it comes to recording hours can prove to be a considerable challenge, particularly when work shifts and overtime limits are concerned.

Jonathan Palley
CEO, QR Codes Unlimited

Jonathan Palley

Communication is essential here. You need to keep your workers informed about policy changes, especially those who regularly work overtime.

You may get some pushback even if you communicate proactively, but you definitely will if you spring this on people.

Make sure the changes you’re considering are compliant with local laws. Paying overtime is expensive, but dealing with labor law violations can be completely ruinous.

David Hunt
COO, Versys Media

David Hunt

One significant challenge HR teams face when updating overtime pay is ensuring compliance across multiple jurisdictions. In our work with clients in diverse industries, we’ve observed how different states and countries have varying regulations regarding overtime pay, leading to complexities in payroll systems.

When legislation changes, it’s crucial for HR to not only update their existing systems but also provide comprehensive training for management and employees alike. This requires consistent communication and clear guidelines to mitigate confusion and ensure everyone understands the new policies. 

Failure to address these areas can result in non-compliance, which may lead to costly fines and damage to employee trust.

Ray Lauzums
CEO, Poggers.com

Ray Lauzums

One major implementation challenge HR teams in the online retail industry like ours at Poggers may face is accurately tracking and compensating for remote or flexible work hours.

With customer service, logistics coordination, and digital marketing roles often extending beyond standard office hours especially during peak shopping seasons defining what qualifies as “overtime” becomes complex.

Many team members work across time zones or asynchronously, and without precise digital timekeeping tools, there’s a risk of non-compliance or employee dissatisfaction.

Additionally, adapting payroll systems and training managers to align with new legislative standards requires time and resources.

Ensuring fairness while maintaining operational agility is a delicate balance that demands both policy clarity and technological support.

Christopher Pappas
Founder, eLearningIndustry

Christopher Pappas

Once overtime pay policies change updates to HR systems will be necessary and most organizations will not be used to that.

Whether it is payroll software or time tracking software even a small hiccup with an automating system can create a domino effect that leads to multiple incorrect paychecks.

HR teams often work in partnership with IT in order to make sure everything is working correctly beyond just the technical aspect, this is a full cross functional project.

This becomes difficult because of the expectation that all systems will continue to run without any issues.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts