productivity

Leadership Habits: Dropping the Bad, Picking Up the Good

Leadership Habits: Dropping the Bad, Picking Up the Good

Effective leadership hinges on evolving habits to meet modern challenges. 

This HR Spotlight article compiles insights from business leaders and HR professionals on one leadership habit they intentionally dropped and one they adopted in recent years, along with the tangible outcomes. 

From abandoning over-control to embracing empowerment, or shifting from reactive availability to strategic clarity, these leaders reveal how purposeful changes drive success. 

Their approaches foster stronger teams, enhance efficiency, and build innovative cultures, providing practical lessons for leaders navigating today’s complex business landscape with intentionality, trust, and sustainable impact.

Read on!

I have slowly had to reprogram myself from certain leadership habits.

One habit in particular that I dropped was making myself constantly available to our agents. Leaving my calendar wide open assuming they would make meetings with me, and then feeling deflated when no one scheduled time with me. It led to burnout, blurred boundaries and small resentment that started to fester. In turn, I replaced it with the habit of protecting my time and energy.

Now I set clear availability windows and require agents to get on my calendar via my assistant. This way I can prioritize deep, intentional conversations over constant accessibility.

The direct outcome ended up being a win-win for everyone. I was able to take control of my calendar with less frustration, protect my peace and it created a healthier dynamic with the agents and gave me the capacity to focus on vision, strategy, and scaling our brokerage.

Protecting Time Boosts Leadership and Results

Aaron Kenny
Founder & HR Delivery Consultant, A1HR Consulting

I consciously dropped the habit of over-explaining decisions to my team in an attempt to gain buy-in.

While transparency is key, I realised I was diluting clarity by over-justifying every move. In its place, I adopted a habit of framing decisions around clear business priorities and trusting my team to engage or challenge constructively if needed.

The outcome? Quicker alignment, less second-guessing, and a stronger culture of accountability. This shift allowed me to lead with more conviction, and my team responded by stepping up with greater ownership and initiative.

Clarity and Trust Replace Over-Explaining

Corina Tham
Finance & Sales Director, Cheap Forex VPS

One leadership practice I intentionally let go of was micromanaging my team.

I found it hindered innovation, dampened enthusiasm, and stopped my team members from reaching their true capabilities. Instead, I embraced delegating responsibilities with confidence and offering clear direction from the outset. This shift cultivated a sense of ownership and responsibility among the group.

The result was increased efficiency, better-quality results, and a more energized and committed team dynamic.

Delegation Replaces Micromanagement for Growth

Oleksii Kratko
Founder & CEO, Snov

The habit I buried was treating my calendar like a Tetris game of back-to-back meetings, jamming every gap with “efficiency.”

In our early days, I’d review minor code commits between investor calls, mistaking motion for momentum. This created a culture of performative busyness where engineers stopped proposing wild ideas, fearing I’d micromanage execution.

Now, I practice “trust sprints”: quarterly experiments where I delegate one mission-critical project with zero oversight. Last quarter, I handed our team a blank check to rebuild our compliance engine, no approvals needed for 90 days. They returned with an AI architecture so elegant it reduced customer onboarding by 40%.

My team now sends Loom updates titled “Look what we built without asking!”, which are some of the proudest notifications I receive.

Sometimes leadership means removing yourself from the equation so brilliance can breathe.

Trust Sprints Empower Team Brilliance

Early on, I thought good leadership meant fast response times. Be available, be reactive, fix things in real-time. It nearly broke me. I was solving the same fires over and over because I wasn’t stepping back to notice why they kept happening.

Now, I log it. I watch for patterns. If it shows up more than once, it earns a place in the system. That shift is why DomiSource runs clean – and why I don’t get midnight calls anymore.

The direct outcome? Fewer “hero moments,” more sustainable execution. My team doesn’t need me in a panic. They need structure, and they get it.

Leadership is about being calm enough to build something that holds, with or without you.

Systematic Leadership Beats Fire-Fighting

Felicia Shakiba
CEO & Executive Coach, CPO PLAYBOOK

The habit I let go of: Always being available. I used to think responsiveness showed strong leadership, but it created bottlenecks and drained both me and my team.

The habit I adopted: Weekly time blocks for deep thinking—no meetings, no distractions. It’s now the most productive part of my week and has helped me make clearer, faster decisions.

That one shift set a new tone for how my clients lead too—especially during high-pressure growth or turnaround moments. When leaders model focus, the rest of the organization follows.

Time Blocking Improves Leadership Focus

Vanessa Anello
Certificate Program Strategist & Facilitator, Workforce Charm

I dropped the habit of trying to control team energy.

Not only was it ineffective, but it was exhausting. I used to try to micromanage momentum, especially as a Facilitator for live certificate programs and workshops (“Welcome, everyone! Let’s stay energized!”).

Now I lean into deliberately shaping the sensory and emotional cues of a room instead of dominating the conversation. This means using lighting, sound, spatial cues (props, material placement , camera angle, are my hands in the shot?- yes that matters, gallery view vs speaker view, using the reaction buttons, interactive tools, etc.) and even pauses to change how people feel.

It’s not just what they hear. I don’t harp on “Be on camera!!!”.

One unexpected benefit was that participation shot up in my workshops and our cert programs. The shift from message-driven to energy-calibrated leadership created more resonance and less resistance. It’s high-leverage, low-cost and almost never taught.

Energy-Calibrated Leadership Creates More Resonance

Nate Chang
Chief Marketing Officer, Sequel Brands

I dropped the habit of being the central problem-solver and instead adopted a leadership style rooted in trust and alignment. 

I thrive in fast-paced, high-pressure environments, but I realized that real momentum comes when the team moves in sync, not just quickly. 

We’ve built a culture of shared ownership by creating space for others to step up, contribute and lead within their roles. It’s not about individual decisions; it’s about shared clarity and collective direction. 

That shift has empowered my teams to move confidently, make smart calls and keep each other accountable. 

The result? More cohesion, faster execution and creativity that resonates because it’s built through collective purpose, not just individual drive.

Trust, Alignment Replace Central Problem-Solving

Jason Post
Founder & Director, Retirement Home Insider

When I started getting promoted into leadership roles of greater responsibility, I became uber focused on results.

In leadership meetings, it was regularly a conversation that started:
“Where are we on….”, “How are we doing…”? My meetings were always driven by questions around whatever project, or metric my department was chasing.

After a while, my messaging became stale and my team began to tune me out.

One day I was with a colleague and he was with a leader on a conference call. He started by saying – “How can I help you?”

I realized later he was focused on their needs, in order to get his objectives met.

It was a mic drop moment – stop being focused just on your goals – you can achieve more by helping your team as well.

Every conversation I have now, includes a standard question “What can I help YOU with?”

Lead With “What Can I Help You With?”

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

What HR and Leaders Look for to Ensure Remote Teams Thrive

What HR and Leaders Look for to Ensure Remote Teams Thrive

By Stanley Anto, Chief Editor, HRSpotlight.com

The past few years have felt like one huge, involuntary experiment in remote work. The initial shock has faded, but here’s the question many of us are still figuring out: How do we, as leaders, truly know if our teams are not just getting by, but actually thriving?

For a long time, the instinct was to keep an eye on every move—video calls, chat activity, login hours. The thinking was simple: if you can’t see your team, are they working at all?

But as we’ve all gained experience, a new truth has emerged: the most effective remote teams aren’t built on surveillance. They’re built on trust, clear communication, and focusing on results, not hours logged. It isn’t about dashboards; it’s about a leadership mindset that believes professionals will do their work well.

So what does this new style of leadership actually look like? I spoke with leaders who have mastered it. Their key insight: focus on outcomes, not on activity, and watch for real signals of engagement rather than digital presence.

The old model was all about clock-watching. Were people logged in? Did they hit their eight hours? But anyone who’s worked remotely knows that hours don’t equal productivity. You could be “online” for eight hours but accomplish very little.

Top remote managers have moved on. They judge success by the final product, not by when or how it was made.

Edward Hones, an employment lawyer and founder of Hones Law PLLC, says it best: “We don’t rely on invasive monitoring to measure remote team effectiveness. We focus on outcome-based KPIs and the timely delivery of high-quality work.”

In Edward’s world, it’s the quality and timeliness of deliverables, whether drafting legal memos or managing cases, that count. This breaks through the noise of digital footprints and focuses on what actually moves the business forward.

But it’s not just about outputs. Edward also pointed out a vital human element: engagement. “A big part of success is responsiveness. Team members who quickly reply to internal questions or client needs tend to be more engaged. They raise red flags early, ask good questions, and take meaningful part in meetings.”

Engaged employees are proactive. They don’t wait to be told what to do. Their communication becomes a clear sign that they’re not just working, but truly invested.

From Hours Logged to Outcomes Delivered

Great teams share a common mission. When work is spread out, informal watercooler chats fade away. Some leaders find that a well-chosen business metric becomes their team’s rallying point.

Gunnar Blakeway-Walen, Marketing Manager at The Heron, Edgewater, explains: “Our conversion rate from marketing leads to signed leases became our key remote team KPI. I stopped tracking hours and started obsessing over this because it demanded perfect coordination between marketing, leasing, and operations.”

When conversion dips, the whole team feels it. They rally to find the issue—whether lead quality is down or follow-ups are slow.

That kind of shared accountability removes the need for micromanagement. The metric drives productivity and collaboration naturally.

Shared, Measurable Goals Unite Teams

Beyond KPIs, consistency matters. Gary Harutyunyan, CEO of SleepyBaby, who manages 28 remote employees across states, discovered that “consistent delivery timelines are the most reliable remote team indicator.”

If a team meets deadlines reliably, you know they’re productive. This isn’t about being wired to the clock 24/7. It’s about honoring commitments—and that means both quality and timeliness.

For teams that do more than just meet expectations, Dhawal Shah, Co-Founder of 2Stallions Digital Marketing, looks for continuous improvement.

He shared, “I track how fast work gets done and watch whether my team improves. Completing tasks quicker while maintaining or improving quality shows they’re gaining mastery and efficiency.”

This kind of progress tracking isn’t surveillance. It celebrates growth and pushes mastery, which fuels long-term success.

Productivity Shows in Consistency and Growth

If you want a roadmap for managing remote teams in 2025, here it is:

– Build a culture of trust. Treat your employees like professionals who can manage their time and workload.

– Set clear, outcome-driven goals and metrics that everyone understands and supports. This could be a shared business KPI or a simple weekly deliverable checklist.

– Keep an eye out for genuine engagement—how quickly your team responds, how proactive they are, and whether you see steady improvement.

By shifting away from surveillance and towards these principles, your remote teams will be more productive, innovative, and resilient.

In our evolving work world, leadership isn’t about watching every keystroke. It’s about empowering people. When you focus on trust, shared purpose, and continuous growth, you build teams that don’t just survive remotely—they thrive.

What Should Leaders Focus on Today?

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

The Productivity Problem No One Talks About: Working Against Employee Instincts

The Productivity Problem No One Talks About: Working Against Employee Instincts

By  David Kolbe, CEO, Kolbe Corp

The marketing team wasn’t working, and Sarah was the star hire everyone expected to transform it. Stanford MBA, five years at top agencies, glowing references. The team and the company were data- and process-driven. The Chief Marketing Officer looked forward to Sarah’s new energy and insight to drive fresh analysis.

Sarah had access to all the market data and a budget for gathering whatever else she needed. There were well-established systems to keep the team on track. But nothing changed. Sarah’s proven knack for intuitive insight and bold yet calculated risk-taking was nowhere to be seen.

The CMO wondered what was wrong with Sarah. The truth was, nothing was wrong with her. The problem was that she wasn’t given the chance to use her strengths in simplifying complex problems and experimenting with novel solutions.

This is what happens when you keep hiring smart, capable people but don’t let them use their strengths. Spending months trying to fix them with coaching, training, and performance improvement plans isn’t going to be the solution.

You’re trying to solve the wrong problem.

For decades, organizations have measured two things about employees:

Skills – how smart they are and what training and experience they have

Temperament – how they interact with others and if they’re a culture fit

Both matter. But there’s a third part of the mind that actually drives performance:

Instinctive Strengths – how they naturally take action when solving problems; specifically, how people execute on the tasks of their job (what’s also known as conation)

The Key Factor People Don’t Know

Here’s what’s been missing from most productivity initiatives: they’ve been built on an incomplete understanding of how people actually work.

While Myers-Briggs® tells you whether someone is an introvert or extrovert and CliftonStrength® identifies what energizes them at work, the Kolbe A™ Index tells you how they will take action when free to do things their way.

Some people instinctively need to research thoroughly before acting. Others need to dive in and learn by doing. Neither is right nor wrong, but when you force someone to work against these instincts, productivity collapses.

Sarah wasn’t failing because she lacked intelligence or drive. She was pulled down when she was forced to operate in a way that thwarted her strengths.

The Missing Foundation

I worked with a sales team that was missing every quarterly target despite having experienced reps and solid leads. The Sales Director was convinced his team lacked discipline and follow-through.

The Director was naturally wired to create detailed processes and systematic tracking procedures. His team was full of people who thrived on taking risks and adapting quickly to opportunities—exactly what you need to close deals under pressure.

The Director expected everyone to work like he did, saddling the risk-takers with detailed procedures and constant reporting. They initially followed his systems, which sapped their energy and quickly became counterproductive. Eventually, they gave up and started ignoring the processes entirely, focusing on what actually moved deals forward. He saw this as insubordination. They saw his processes as obstacles to results. The relationship deteriorated while systems broke down.

When Good Teams Produce Poor Results

We made three strategic changes:

– Moved their best innovators into outbound roles where they could prospect and open new accounts, with systematic coordinators ensuring company processes and CRM requirements were handled


– Put process-oriented people in account management roles where they could provide consistent service and systematic follow-up for existing clients


– Created clear handoffs between hunting and farming so each person worked in their natural sweet spot while still being accountable for defined results

The results? The Director stopped feeling like he was fighting the team. People finally understood their different approaches to getting results. Rep satisfaction scores improved significantly. Most importantly, the team exceeded the next quarter’s targets.

The Solution That Actually Worked

You’ve been addressing surface-level behaviors instead of understanding the fundamental ways people operate. It’s like treating a fever without diagnosing the infection.

Once you understand how someone instinctively approaches problems, you have new, durable solutions to problems that seemed unsolvable:

– Leadership development actually sticks when it aligns with natural strengths

– Change management initiatives become easier and smoother when they adapt to how people naturally handle change

– Team collaboration improves when people understand each other’s approaches

Why Your Current Solutions Keep Failing

Leadership Development That Actually Develops

Before investing in more leadership training, understand how your emerging leaders naturally approach problems. Some instinctively drive innovation and change. Others naturally stabilize and improve existing systems. Both are valuable, but they need different development paths.

Making Distributed Work Actually Work

Remote collaboration fails when you force everyone to work the same way. Some people need detailed planning and structure to be effective remotely. Others thrive with flexibility and autonomy. Design systems that accommodate both styles instead of fighting against them.

Hiring for Performance, Not Interviews

Start hiring people whose instinctive problem-solving approach fits what the job actually requires. Which marketing role needs breakthrough innovation? Don’t hire the thorough researcher who wants to analyze every data point just because they have impressive credentials.

What This Means for Your Biggest HR Challenges

Start with your most persistent productivity problems—the teams that seem stuck, the high-performers who suddenly plateau, the conflicts that keep recurring despite intervention.

Instead of asking “What training do they need?” ask “Are we tapping into people’s strengths?”

Look at Sarah’s story. Once her manager understood she was built to simplify and innovate, they restructured her role. She became the catalyst that drove the team to break away from analysis paralysis and risk aversion. Unshackled, she fulfilled her promise and became the team’s greatest asset.

This doesn’t mean letting people do whatever they want. Leaders still define deliverables and hold people accountable for outcomes. The freedom is in how people achieve those defined results, not whether they achieve them.

A Simple Place to Start

You’ve been trying to change people instead of understanding them. You’ve been building productivity solutions on an incomplete foundation.

As you navigate leadership challenges, distributed teams, and pressure to deliver more with less, here’s what remains constant: people still need to solve problems and make decisions. The question is whether you’re working with their instinctive problem-solving abilities or against them.

When you align roles with how people are naturally wired to act, those persistent productivity problems finally start solving themselves.

The Bottom Line

About David Kolbe

David Kolbe, CEO of Kolbe Corp, has lived and breathed the Kolbe Concept® his whole life. He is an author, speaker, and visionary behind many of Kolbe’s products and innovations. He is known for his ability to help business leaders unleash innovation through their people. David has assisted thousands of professionals through seminars and speaking engagements on topics such as hiring, organizational design and team building. His expertise in legal, financial, intellectual property and management issues gives him an edge when turning innovation into profit. David’s lasting mark on Kolbe Corp began with helping to develop the original algorithm for the company’s flagship Kolbe ATM Index. Along with Kolbe Corp President Amy Bruske, David penned Do More, More Naturally, the go-to guide for effortless success.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

From Autopilot to Purpose: Transformative Habit Shifts

From Autopilot to Purpose: Transformative Habit Shifts

Leadership habits shape organizational success, and adapting them intentionally can yield transformative results. 

This HR Spotlight article gathers insights from business leaders and HR professionals on one habit they consciously dropped and one they adopted in recent years, along with the direct outcomes. 

From abandoning micromanagement to embracing delegation, or shifting from over-efforting to seeking ease, these leaders reveal how small changes drive big impact. 

By fostering trust, empowering teams, and prioritizing clarity, their strategies enhance collaboration, boost efficiency, and create thriving cultures, offering actionable lessons for leaders navigating today’s dynamic business landscape.

Read on!

I have pushed back on leader-centric branding. As a founder, it is a default for an organization to focus on the high-profile leader.

This often created bottlenecks in workflows, business development and customer success.

Being deliberate in pushing leadership to others in the organization and doing so in outward ways has proven valuable to both individual contributor development and brand identity.

Distributed Leadership Builds Brand Identity

I’ve been that manager. The one who caused good people to quit. If I am honest, that’s a pretty hard pill to swallow, but it’s true.

So when I started my own business in 2022, I made myself a promise: I will never be the reason someone dreads coming to work. But saying it and living it were two very different things. To actually become the kind of leader I wanted to be, I had to make two major shifts:

– I had to let go of the belief that I had to know everything. Somewhere along the way, I picked up this idea that being a leader meant having all the answers. Spoiler alert: it doesn’t. What does it mean?

It means hiring people who are better than you in areas where you’re weak. Trusting them. Learning from them. And genuinely celebrating when they shine… even when (especially when) they surpass you.

– I had to give my team clarity and trust. We did that by building our rulebook, not a dusty policy binder, but our core values: Authenticity, Knowledge, Efficiency, Accuracy, Gratitude, Integrity. These aren’t just words we stuck on the website. They are everything. We talk about them in daily huddles. We hired them. We fire them. Every single person on my team knows where we’re going and how we’re getting there, because our values are committed to memory and engraved on their hearts.

Those two shifts changed everything. My business took off. Our goals stopped feeling like wishful thinking and started becoming reality. And my team? They became more confident, capable, and engaged than ever.

As the CEO of a growing consulting company, this evolution didn’t just help the business grow, it gave me the space to lead with vision instead of just managing chaos.

If you’ve ever looked around and thought, “This isn’t working”… it might be time to look inward. Because real leadership? It’s not about control. It’s about clarity. It’s about trust. And it’s about building something people are excited to be part of.

Leadership Shifts from Control to Clarity

One habit I’ve intentionally adopted is asking a subset of the team to develop even deeply impactful strategies without my direct involvement. On the flip side, I’ve quit trying to be involved in every brainstorming session. I used to be so involved in shaping our messaging that I’d read every blog post before it got published (and edit heavily).

The hands-on approach got us where we are, and I don’t regret it. It won’t get us where we’re going though. We have a strong brand and team in place, so there’s no reason to let my own bandwidth limit either.

The team will do things I won’t like. Occasional failures are inevitable. We won’t let the fear of failure prevent us from putting things into production so we can gather market feedback. This is exactly what I discuss in my book, and what we teach our clients.

Trusting the Team for Growth

Dr. Jaime Goff
Founder of The Empathic Leader and author, The Secure Leader

My team and I design and run our company’s flagship executive leadership program, a high-profile initiative with a large budget.

In the early cohorts, I tried to empower my team by delegating key pieces, yet as launch dates loomed my anxiety and perfectionism kicked in. I slipped into micromanagement, asking them rapid-fire questions that felt like interrogations. I was projecting my stress and undercutting their confidence.

Recognizing this pattern, I turned the spotlight inward. When visibility and pressure rise, I now pause, breathe, and use quick reflective prompts to challenge the story in my head. I still check progress but with curiosity and support rather than control. The result is a calmer leader, a more capable team, and a richer learning experience for our future executives.

Curiosity Beats Micromanagement for Leaders

As a result of the pandemic I stopped spreading myself too thin by overscheduling/hitting multiple overlapping networking events, etc.

I learned to disconnect from technology and focus on cultivating human/face-to-face relationships.

Meeting for coffee/lunch even virtually not only allows you to refuel/recharge but it also accomplishes so much more than e-mail/social media posts.

I now give myself permission to say no. Whether it means sleeping in (no to an alarm clock), meditating, taking a walk, or just turning off the phone/computer (no I will respond later on my own schedule), simple acts of letting myself relax and enjoy the moment are the very best gifts I can give myself.

What I have come to appreciate and realize is that “me time” is not a luxury or pampering like it was in my youth, now it is maintenance! Doing less can be more impactful.

Disconnecting and Learning to Say No

Jeff Williams
President & CEO, Aptia Group US

One leadership habit I consciously let go of was tolerating people who lacked integrity.

I call it my personal “no jerks” rule.

I made a promise to only build and lead alongside people of real fabric, people I trust and respect. If I’m going to pour myself into building something, it has to be with people I believe in and in a culture I’m proud of. Why give myself to anything less?

On the flip side, one habit I’ve intentionally adopted is what I call the power of a little bit more.

In a world that can feel fragile and uncertain, I’ve developed a mindset of giving just a bit more to my work, to my people, to my life.

I work out a little bit stronger, love a little bit harder, hug my wife a little bit tighter.

That small shift has created a life and leadership style driven by purpose, not just productivity. It has helped me build not only successful teams but meaningful ones.

Integrity and Purpose Define Leadership

Angela Justice
Founder & Executive Coach, Justice Group Advisors

I used to believe that if I wasn’t exhausted, I probably wasn’t doing enough.

So I overfunctioned. Took on too much. Made things harder than they needed to be. And I called it leadership.

The habit I dropped was over-efforting. What I adopted instead was asking: What would make this easier?

That question changed everything. It helped me see that effort ≠ impact. Now, before I take something on—or when it starts to feel heavier than it should—I pause and ask:

– What’s the simplest path to the outcome I want?

– What would this look like if it were 20% easier?

– What might I be making harder than it needs to be?

Now I move faster, lead better, and make more space for the people around me to do the same.

Ease isn’t lazy. It’s leadership without the drag.

And when other leaders hear that, they exhale—because they’ve been carrying too much for too long.

Ease is Leadership Without the Drag

Sarah Williams
Founder & Principal, Recruit Healthcare

In recent years, I made a conscious decision to let go of micromanaging.

It was actually a family member who first said something. We were making dinner together, and (as usual) I was trying to control everything from the oven temperature to the garbage collection. What I thought was just good advice was actually undermining her abilities, and suddenly, it hit me — I do this to my employees, hovering over them, and unintentionally limiting their independence.
And, just like in the kitchen, the habit wasn’t doing me any favors.

Since then, I’ve consciously replaced micromanagement with intentional delegation.

I’ve learned to trust my team with real ownership of their work and to give them the space to make decisions and solve problems without me hovering over every detail.

The change has been transformational. The team moves faster, takes more initiative, and genuinely feels empowered in their roles when less supervised.

Intentional Delegation Replaces Micromanagement for Growth

Sheena Yap Chan
Wall Street Journal Bestselling Author, The Tao of Self-Confidence

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was over-explaining myself to be “liked” or validated.

As an Asian woman, I was taught to soften my voice and over-justify my decisions to avoid conflict or judgment. Letting go of that habit allowed me to lead with more clarity and self-trust.

The habit I intentionally adopted was listening more deeply without immediately reacting. Instead of rushing to fill space or provide answers, I now give others room to process and speak fully. That shift created stronger relationships, better collaboration, and more empowered conversations.

Real leadership isn’t about controlling every outcome—it’s about holding space and showing up with intention.

Leading with Clarity, not Over-Explaining

One leadership habit I’ve intentionally adopted is being honest, especially when I don’t have the answers.

If someone comes to me with a problem I can’t immediately solve, I don’t bluff or pretend like I know it all, but simply tell them I’ll find out.

The same goes for mistakes that I will always own, and I expect the same from my teams. You will be amazed at how powerful mistakes can be as a leader.

I’ve also consciously dropped the habit of always trying to provide solutions.

I used to think offering quick fixes showed competence, but it actually discouraged creative thinking and added to my own stress. Now, I just focus on creating space for my team to bring their own ideas. And that has resulted in a more confident, creative team, plus a much healthier dynamic for everyone involved, including me.

Honesty And Humility Empower Great Teams

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Optimizing Employee Performance: Leaders’ Tips for Effective Evaluations

Optimizing Employee Performance: Leaders’ Tips for Effective Evaluations

What’s the optimal frequency for employee performance evaluations? 

And what are the most effective methods and tools for conducting these reviews? 

These are crucial questions for any organization seeking to foster a high-performance culture and support the growth and development of its employees. 

In this post, we seek answers from those leading the way. 

Here, HR and business leaders share their current practices, revealing how often they conduct performance evaluations and detailing the preferred methods and tools they utilize. 

Their insights provide a practical guide for organizations looking to optimize their performance management processes and create a more meaningful and impactful experience for both employees and managers.

Read on!

Khurram Mir
Founder & Chief Marketing Officer, Kualitatem Inc

Quarterly or Biannually

In order to give regular feedback and guarantee consistency with business objectives, employee performance reviews are usually carried out on a quarterly or biannual basis. 

A combination of techniques, including one-on-one meetings, self-evaluations, and 360-degree feedback, enables a thorough review of an employee’s contributions and opportunities for improvement. 

The process is streamlined by tools like Lattice, BambooHR, or 15Five, which track performance data, provide clear goals, and enable ongoing feedback. 

In addition to increasing employee engagement, regular evaluations help the company develop a culture of accountability and progress.

Top-Notch Service with Semiannual Reviews

At Ponce Tree Services, we conduct employee performance evaluations semi-annually to ensure our team consistently delivers top-notch service. 

With over 20 years of experience in the industry and as a certified arborist with TRAQ certification, I’ve developed a structured approach to these evaluations. 

Each session includes both a formal review and a hands-on assessment in the field. We use a combination of key performance indicators like safety adherence, customer feedback, productivity, and technical skill improvement to measure success. 

Tools such as checklists tailored to our services and 360-degree feedback help us gather well-rounded insights. By incorporating regular coaching sessions throughout the year, we ensure our employees are prepared for the review process, making it constructive rather than intimidating.

One example of how this approach has created positive outcomes involves a crew member who struggled initially with advanced pruning techniques. Through our hands-on evaluations, we identified the issue and tailored a training plan, pairing them with an experienced team lead for mentorship. 

Within six months, their skill level improved significantly, and their customer ratings went from good to excellent. My years of experience allowed me to spot potential and provide the right resources to unlock it. 

These evaluations aren’t just about critiquing performance; they’re an opportunity to build confidence, address gaps, and empower the team to grow. 

This commitment to development is a big reason our employees stay with us long-term and take pride in their work.

A Mix of Quantitative KPIs and Qualitative Feedback

I conduct employee performance evaluations quarterly because businesses move fast, and waiting a year to address performance issues or recognize achievements is too slow. 

My preferred method is a mix of quantitative KPIs and qualitative feedback. I use structured one on one meetings, peer reviews, and self assessments to get a full picture of an employee’s contributions. Tools like performance management software help track progress, but real conversations matter most. 

My background in running multimillion-dollar businesses and coaching companies across different industries has shown me that a strong evaluation process drives both individual and business growth. 

A great example of this was when I worked with a struggling mid-sized company in the UAE that had issues with employee accountability. By implementing structured quarterly evaluations, setting clear performance metrics, and training managers to give constructive feedback, we saw a 40% increase in productivity within six months. 

Employees felt more engaged, turnover dropped, and the company’s profitability rose significantly. 

My years of experience in business coaching and my MBA in finance helped me design an evaluation system that aligned individual goals with business objectives, ensuring both the employees and the company thrived.

Peter Hunt
Director & Physiotherapist, The Alignment Studio

Biannual Evaluations for Regular Progress

At The Alignment Studio, we conduct employee performance evaluations biannually. 

This schedule allows us to regularly assess progress, set new goals, and provide timely feedback to ensure our team remains engaged and supported. 

These evaluations are a collaborative process, blending formal one-on-one discussions with ongoing informal check-ins throughout the year. We use a combination of structured performance metrics, tailored to each role, and qualitative feedback from both team members and clients. 

For instance, we track client satisfaction scores, professional development progress, and each employee’s contributions to our integrated care model. This approach ensures that evaluations are comprehensive and aligned with our mission to provide exceptional, multidisciplinary care. 

An example of this process in action is when I identified one of our newer physical therapists struggling to confidently manage complex cases. 

Leveraging my more than 30 years of experience, I mentored them through case studies and invited them to shadow me with athletes recovering from post-surgical rehabilitation. 

We incorporated a professional development plan into their evaluation, including additional training and regular case reviews. Within six months, their confidence had grown significantly, and they received glowing client feedback, particularly from patients dealing with similar challenges. 

This success story highlights how combining structured evaluations with tailored mentorship not only benefits the employee but enhances the overall quality of care we provide at The Alignment Studio.

Quarterly Evaluations for High Standards

At Ozzie Mowing & Gardening, I conduct employee performance evaluations on a quarterly basis. 

I believe regular feedback is key to maintaining high standards and ensuring the team consistently delivers exceptional results for our clients. 

With over 15 years of experience in the industry and a strong foundation in horticulture, I’ve developed an evaluation system that combines practical observation, client feedback, and employee self-assessment. 

During the evaluation process, I spend time working alongside each team member to see their skills in action, assess their knowledge, and provide on the spot coaching where needed. This hands-on approach ensures I can tailor feedback to their strengths and areas for improvement. 

Additionally, we collect client reviews and comments regularly, which give us valuable insights into how well we’re meeting expectations.

One example that stands out is when we hired a new team member who had little professional gardening experience but a clear passion for the field. 

Through regular evaluations and mentoring, I was able to guide them in developing essential skills like plant care techniques and efficient lawn maintenance. 

By setting measurable goals during each evaluation and using visual tools like before and after photos of projects to track progress, this team member quickly became one of our most reliable staff members. 

This structured, supportive process not only improved their performance but also enhanced the overall quality of our services. 

My qualifications and experience gave me the ability to spot their potential early on and provide the tools they needed to succeed, which ultimately strengthened our team as a whole.

Meghan Calhoun
Co-Founder & Director of Partner Success, Give River

Continuous Feedback and Real-Time Recognition

At Give River, we conduct employee performance evaluations with a focus on fostering a culture of gratitude and emotional intelligence, rather than limiting ourselves to traditional timelines. 

How frequently we evaluate isn’t set in stone—sometimes it’s weekly, other times it aligns with milestones like project completion. 

Our Insights Dashboard helps track real-time engagement and feedback, allowing us to adapt our evaluation frequency and approach continuously. 

Using tools like our Feedback Friday, we capture the team’s pulse regularly, ensuring concerns are addressed promptly. This encourages open dialogue and continuous improvement, aligning with our mission to create supportive environments. 

The positive loop of feedback from gamified challenges and recognition efforts has, for example, revealed an 88% increase in motivation and engagement among employees who felt valued. 

Making employee recognition a natural part of daily communication has been facilitated through integrations with platforms like Slack and MS Teams. 

These methods not only improve real-time evaluations but also instill a sense of belonging and appreciation across teams, which bolsters performance. 

My podcast and broader initiatives also emphasize these strengths, helping working moms integrate career growth and personal joy seamlessly. 

At Give River, we prioritize ongoing employee development rather than traditional performance evaluations. 

Inspired by Positive Intelligence and emotional intelligence principles, we emphasize continuous feedback and real-time recognition. This approach stems from my diverse career experiences, where recognizing and appreciating individual strengths significantly boosted team morale and productivity. 

We use our own platform’s innovative features, such as Feedback Friday, to capture regular employee insights. This method ensures feedback is timely and actionable, fostering a culture of open communication and continuous improvement. 

Our unique ‘drops’ system rewards team contributions, promoting engagement and motivation. For instance, after implementing a pilot of our gamified recognition tools, we noted a 20% increase in employee engagement within a month. 

This reinforces the belief that continuous, meaningful recognition can reduce burnout and increase overall workplace satisfaction.

Aligning Evaluations with Milestones and Initiatives

In my previous role as the head of a company with over 500 employees, I learned the importance of integrating innovative solutions into our operations. 

We didn’t follow a traditional performance evaluation schedule. Instead, we aligned assessments with specific company milestones and healthcare initiatives that directly impacted our bottom line. 

For instance, when we implemented the Frontier Direct Care program, we closely monitored employee health engagement and related performance metrics, which significantly reduced healthcare costs. 

I found that direct feedback and engagement were more effective than formal reviews. We encouraged open communication between employees and managers, allowing real-time adjustments and support. 

This approach fostered a culture of continuous improvement and accountability, aligning personal development with the company’s strategic goals. 

Incorporating DPC principles into our evaluation process also highlighted the importance of personalized care—not just in health but in professional development. 

By focusing on individual needs and strengths, we created a supportive environment that empowered employees to excel, much like the personalized healthcare model we advocate at Best DPC.

Monthly or Quarterly Check-Ins

In our experience, the traditional annual review often falls short in fostering meaningful growth. Instead, we’ve seen the most success when organizations embrace more frequent conversations—monthly or quarterly check-ins. 

These regular touchpoints allow for timely feedback, reduce recency bias, and create an ongoing dialogue that supports both employees and managers. 

To make this approach effective, it’s helpful to combine methods like one-on-one conversations and peer feedback with tools that simplify the process. 

Finding tools that help to aggregate all of that information helps to make the process more effective while also alleviating managers’ workloads. 

When feedback becomes part of the rhythm of work rather than a once-a-year event, it drives performance improvement in a way that annual reviews simply can’t match. The employee improves more quickly and the organization benefits as a result.

Uncovering Real Value of Daily Interactions

Managing an international remote team of design professionals means rethinking performance reviews to make them collaborative, continuous, and supportive. 

Rather than rigid, top-down evaluations, we focus on fostering open communication and empowering the team to thrive.

Formal check-ins happen every three months, where we review goals, align on priorities, and map out personal growth. 

However, the real value lies in our day-to-day interactions, which cover ongoing feedback, and problem-solving sessions. I trust my team to voice their needs and challenges, and my role is to provide the resources, guidance, and space for them to succeed.

We rely on simple yet effective tools like Calendly for scheduling and Notion for tracking progress, sharing updates, and maintaining transparency. 

This approach creates an environment of trust and agility, where feedback flows both ways, and performance is less about a singular review and more about continuous improvement and collaboration.

Biannual Evaluations with Seasonal Alignment

In my role as Vice President at Malek Service Company, we conduct employee performance evaluations biannually as part of our Total Protection Plan initiative. This approach allows us to align evaluations with key seasonal maintenance periods in our industry. 

By evaluating performance alongside these critical business operations, we ensure our team is effectively contributing to our core services of HVAC, plumbing, and electrical maintenance.

I prioritize using a blend of qualitative feedback from customers and quantitative performance metrics. 

For instance, we analyze customer feedback forms and service completion rates to assess technician performance. This dual approach provides a comprehensive view of employee effectiveness, ensuring our high standards of customer service and technical expertise are maintained.

We also incorporate continuous skills training and technology updates into our evaluation process. 

By doing so, we not only assess past performance but actively support future growth, ensuring our team is prepared to use and implement the latest industry innovations. This proactive strategy keeps us at the forefront of service excellence.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Polyworking: Opportunity or Overload? Examining the Pros and Cons

Polyworking: Opportunity or Overload? Examining the Pros and Cons

The traditional notion of a single, full-time job is being challenged by the rise of polyworking, a phenomenon where individuals juggle multiple professional roles. 

Driven by factors such as the gig economy, remote work opportunities, and a desire for greater flexibility and income diversification, polywork is rapidly gaining traction. 

But is this trend a positive development or a cause for concern? 

Insights from HR experts and business leaders in this post explore the complexities of polyworking, analyzing its pros and cons for both employees and employers, and examining its potential to reshape the future of the workforce.

Read on!

Silvia Angeloro
Executive Coach, Resume Mentor

I believe that polyworking, in which people work on many occupations or projects at the same time, will undoubtedly affect the future of employment. 

It’s more than simply a fad; more and more people demand flexibility in their professions. 

I’ve observed friends who balance a full-time job with a side business or freelance work. It allows people to pursue multiple interests rather than relying on a single source of income.

On the plus side, it allows employees a lot of independence. You don’t have to stay in the same role for years, and you can explore new opportunities without giving up your day job. 

However, I’ve discovered that it can also contribute to burnout. The thrill of juggling multiple projects can quickly turn into fatigue if you don’t manage your time.

For employers, it’s complicated. 

On the one hand, companies want to retain talented personnel, but those same employees may be performing additional work on the side. It forces businesses to reconsider how they assess productivity and focus on outcomes rather than hours.

Jean Chen
COO & CHRO, Mondressy

Polyworking, the practice of balancing multiple jobs or projects simultaneously, is more than just a trend; it’s increasingly becoming a way to adapt to modern career demands. 

Technology enables this shift, allowing people to work flexibly and explore different fields. 

For employees, it offers the chance to diversify skills and spread income streams, reducing reliance on a single employer. Imagine a graphic designer freelancing on diverse projects while running an online shop—each role enriching the other through new skills and perspectives.

For employers, tapping into a polyworking talent pool means bringing in fresh ideas and varied experiences. However, it also raises challenges like ensuring commitment and managing confidentiality. 

One effective method for companies is implementing clear guidelines and open communication channels, ensuring alignment on priorities.

Polyworking might reshape employment norms, as both individuals and companies lean towards versatile working arrangements. 

Future workplaces might focus on project-based engagements, customized roles, and niche expertise, fostering environments where continuous skill development is key. 

This approach isn’t just a passing fad; it’s a strategic evolution in the workplace, enhancing adaptability and innovation.

Clooney Wan
Founder and CEO, TrackingMore

Polyworking has been a mainstay in most remote work settings since the onset of the pandemic in early 2020. 

However, I do not consider it the future of work. 

Polyworking is simply moonlighting, which is frowned upon in most employment settings and breaks trust between employer and employee.

Polyworking will continue for a while with all the uncertainty surrounding some industries as a result of AI and Machine Learning. However, as businesses refocus their priorities on people, they will want dedicated employees who are loyal to their brands. 

Moreover, issues with employment contracts and non-disclosure agreements will make polyworking difficult for most employees to manage.

Edo Sagron
Flutter Developer, Sagron

I see polyworking as more than just a trend; it reflects a shift in how people think about careers and personal fulfillment. 

Many professionals today are highly skilled in multiple areas and find that diverse roles keep them engaged and broaden their experience. 

For instance, in my own life, managing both the technical side of multiple personal and client projects as a developer while working for a different company as an integrator AND running my own business and store, has helped me stay energized and inspired. 

It’s a balancing act, but the benefits are tangible: more skills, broader connections, and a wider impact.

For employers, polyworking can bring flexibility and a diversity of skill sets to teams, which can be an asset, especially for smaller businesses. 

The challenge, though, lies in ensuring commitment and setting clear expectations. Employees may need more flexibility, but there’s also an opportunity here to redefine productivity based on results rather than hours.

In short, polyworking seems to me like a natural evolution in the workplace that, when managed well, could lead to better alignment between professional goals and personal interests.

Naomi Clarke
Head of HR & Chief Diversity Officer, Flingster

I believe polyworking aligns well with the evolving work landscape, especially for Gen Z. This generation is naturally inclined to multitask and explore diverse interests, often thriving in dynamic environments. 

The potential benefits of polyworking include increased autonomy, varied income streams, and the opportunity for individuals to pursue different passions, contributing to personal growth and job satisfaction.

However, while polyworking can be a boon for employees seeking flexibility, it can be tricky for us hiring managers. Employers may face concerns over divided attention and potential conflicts of interest, impacting productivity and engagement. 

To balance this, clear policies and open dialogue about workload expectations are the way to go. Employers that embrace polyworking by supporting flexible schedules and fostering trust can turn this trend into an asset, retaining talent that values independence and adaptability. 

Polyworking is more than a passing trend—it may redefine traditional work structures and talent management for the better.

Polyworking is more than a passing trend. I believe it has the potential to change the way we think about employment by encouraging diverse skills and experiences. In my own experience, employees who manage more than one role often bring fresh ideas and a wider perspective to the team, which benefits everyone involved. 

This shift may gradually reshape traditional career paths, as people explore opportunities that build a more varied skill set. By adapting to this change, workplaces can foster environments that are both versatile and inspiring.

Employees might be strongly motivated by the opportunity to experiment with diverse revenue streams and acquire skills in a variety of professions through polyworking. For instance, in order to have a more varied working life, one of my drivers also works as a freelance photographer. 

By providing flexibility without the commitment of full-time recruiting, project-based hiring allows employers to access specialized skills. 

Employers may need to modify their expectations around availability and involvement, though, as juggling numerous responsibilities necessitates setting clear boundaries to prevent burnout. This system can benefit both sides if there is effective communication.

In my business, I have worked with a digital marketer who also manages their own online projects, which allows them to bring fresh, up-to-date insights into our marketing efforts. This kind of arrangement is ideal for us because it brings in talent on a flexible basis without long-term constraints. 

Another example is hiring a web developer for a particular project, which gives us specialized skills right when we need them, without adding to our permanent team. 

To make these relationships work, both sides need clear guidelines and regular check-ins to keep expectations aligned. This way, both the employee and the employer can get the best from each other.

Polyworking appears to be more than a trend, offering a genuine evolution in the way we view work. 

By finding a balance that respects both flexibility and structure, I believe we can build workplaces that support growth and variety for everyone involved.

Christine Dalayap
Business Executive Manager, JP Franklin Roofing

Polyworking—balancing multiple roles, often across industries—is more than a trend; it’s a powerful shift in the employment landscape that’s here to stay. 

This model appeals to talent seeking variety and control over their careers and provides companies with a pool of diverse, adaptive skills.

Imagine a digital marketer who freelances while working part-time in content strategy. Companies gain flexible expertise without long-term overhead, while employees enjoy autonomy and growth opportunities.

For employers, polyworking presents a chance to access specialized skills on demand, especially in rapidly changing fields like tech or digital media. But it does come with challenges: managers may need to help to maintain team cohesion and to ensure commitment when employees juggle multiple roles.

From the employee side, the flexibility is liberating but requires strong self-discipline to avoid burnout. 

As companies adjust, effective talent management will increasingly focus on performance outcomes over hours clocked in, reshaping our traditional views on employment.

Ken Marshall
Chief Strategy Officer, Revenuezen

As someone who has had no less than 2 side hustles through 3 jobs, owning 2 agencies, and making it through 3 exits, I can tell you that it’s my preferred way of working and has always made sense to me. 

It’s become clear to younger generations that their employers aren’t going to give them a raise each year, pay a generous pension, or give them that gold watch after 30 years of dedicated service. 

They see the layoffs on the news everyday and grew up in multiple economic downturns. So their response of maximizing their income by being efficient is logical. 

It’s not a fad because the underlying economic and cultural trends driving this behavior are continuing in the same direction. 

I think that employers should stop and ask themselves “am I creating a work environment where incentives to my team are aligned with OUTCOMES and not simply being busy working on tasks?” 

If you align job descriptions and responsibilities of your employees with clear business outcomes, you start to care a lot less about how and where they spend their time.

Josh Qian
COO and Co-Founder,  Best Online Cabinets

I recognize that polyworking is not just a trend but a potential cornerstone of the future workplace. 

This approach allows employees to engage in multiple roles, which can enhance their creativity and problem-solving abilities. 

For instance, a team member who works in customer service might also take on a role in product development, leading to insights that improve our offerings based on direct customer feedback. 

From an employer’s standpoint, polyworking can help attract a diverse talent pool. Many professionals today seek flexibility and variety in their careers, and offering a polyworking environment can make us more competitive in attracting top talent. 

While it offers flexibility and the opportunity to diversify skills, it can lead to challenges that not everyone can handle. For some people, the pressure to manage multiple roles can be overwhelming, leading to stress and burnout. 

Only some people thrive in an environment where they must juggle various responsibilities, especially if they prefer a more structured and focused work style. 

Certain roles also require deep specialization, and polyworking may dilute expertise and focus. 

Polyworking can drive innovation by blending diverse skill sets but also necessitates a shift in performance metrics. 

Instead of traditional KPIs focused solely on individual output, we may need to adopt more holistic measures that evaluate collaboration and impact across various roles.

David Berwick
IT Recruitment consultant and business owner, Adria Solutions

Working as a specialist recruitment consultant for over 20 years, I have noticed a growing pressure for professionals in tech, digital and marketing professionals to have a side gig or side project. 

Junior web developers, for instance, are expected to have their own website or portfolio of websites. Meanwhile, social media managers are expected to be influencers/content creators and be active on several social media platforms. 

Recruiters and hiring managers value the previous experience a side job gives candidates. 

However, most employers will also prefer that their employees focus all their energy on one job they’re getting paid for, with the exception of start-up founders, who often understand and benefit from working with professionals who are also developing their own ideas or companies hiring part-time or on a contractor basis. 

Many employers hesitate to hire someone with a side job or project because they fear they wouldn’t be fully committed to their company. 

Said that, if companies want to attract employees who have other jobs, they can opt for contractors or offer further flexibility, such as shorter/comprised working hours, a four-day working week, flexible time and part-time options.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing their insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRspotlight.com, and our team will share your insights.

Recent Posts