Menu

leadership

The 2026 Culture Reset: Start With How People Are Wired to Work

by

January 29, 2026

The 2026 Culture Reset: Start With How People Are Wired to Work

By David Kolbe

Most cultural breakdowns don’t start with strategy or values. They start with leadership behavior. How decisions get made. How conflict gets handled. How trust builds or erodes in the small moments that add up over time.

If your organization is planning a culture reset in 2026, this is where to look first. Not at your mission statement or your perks, but at the patterns of behavior shaping how leaders and teams actually operate.

The organizations that sustain culture change understand something most miss. There is a part of the mind driving these behaviors that rarely gets discussed.

  • What Gets Overlooked

When leaders think about how people work, they focus on two things: what people think and how they feel. Skills, knowledge, engagement, morale. All of that matters. None of it explains why the same behavioral issues persist even after new values, new training, or a fresh engagement survey.

There is a third dimension: conation, or how people naturally take action when solving problems.

Some people gather detailed information before deciding. Others move forward with less, simplifying as they go. Some create structure and sequence their work carefully. Others keep things loose and adapt. Some initiate change and handle uncertainty well. Others stabilize what works and protect what is proven.

None of these approaches is better than another. But when leaders do not understand these differences, in themselves or their teams, it shows up in exactly the behaviors that break culture.

  • Where It Shows Up

Think about how decisions get made on your team. A leader who needs lots of data and a detailed strategy before committing will clash with team members who operate fine without exhaustive detail. One side experiences delay. The other experiences pressure. Without a shared understanding of how each person is wired, the tension becomes personal. Trust starts to crack.

Conflict follows the same pattern. When someone who naturally creates structure works alongside someone who adapts as they go and resists structure, disagreement gets framed as insubordination or lack of alignment. The real issue is a difference in instinctive approach. But when it is misread, conflict shifts from how work gets done to judgments about character. That is where cultures turn toxic.

Over time, teams compensate. People stop speaking plainly. Communication becomes guarded. Workarounds replace collaboration. Leaders respond with more rules, more oversight, more meetings. What looks like a culture problem is often unresolved conative friction.

  • What the Research Shows

Kolbe Corp’s Workplace Reality Report puts numbers to this. Among more than 1,000 professionals surveyed, 42 percent reported losing the equivalent of one full workday each week because they are required to work against their natural strengths.

When asked what drains their energy most, 37 percent pointed to tasks requiring them to work against their instincts. That ranked higher than unclear expectations, deadlines, or difficult colleagues.

The impact extends beyond productivity. Only 40 percent reported having enough energy left for their personal lives after work. Among those spending more than half their week misaligned, 70 percent described their stress as unsustainable.

And people are leaving over this. Thirty-eight percent have considered leaving specifically because they cannot use their strengths. When asked to rank what matters most in job satisfaction, “tasks that fit me best” came in just behind compensation, ahead of work-life balance.

These are not engagement issues. They are alignment issues.

  • When Leaders Get This Right

Leaders who understand conation interpret behavior differently. They recognize when friction is rooted in instinct, not competence. They stop labeling differences as performance problems. They design roles that let people work with their natural grain instead of against it.

They build teams differently too. Instead of unintentionally stacking similar approaches, they create teams with complementary ways of taking action. Disagreement becomes useful rather than corrosive.

The outcomes are measurable. Organizations that align work with instinctive strengths see dramatic reductions in turnover intent. Flow states increase. Energy holds up across the week. Stress becomes manageable instead of chronic.

Culture improves not because people are trying harder, but because fewer people are fighting themselves just to get through the day.

  • A Different Starting Point

For HR leaders planning culture work in 2026, this means starting somewhere different. Before rolling out new values or launching another engagement survey, look at the leadership behaviors shaping daily work.

How do your leaders instinctively make decisions? How do they respond to uncertainty? How do those patterns interact with the people they lead? Where is friction being created by mismatched instincts rather than genuine disagreement?

Build this awareness into hiring, onboarding, role design, and team formation. Make it part of how your organization explains behavior, not just how it evaluates outcomes.

  • The Piece That Makes Culture Work

Culture work that focuses only on what people think and feel will always be incomplete. The behaviors that sustain or undermine culture are driven by something deeper.

Until leaders understand how people naturally take action, they will keep trying to fix problems they cannot fully see.

Organizations that get this right build cultures where the daily reality of how people work together matches the values on the wall. That alignment is what makes culture durable.

That is the reset worth making in 2026.

About the Author

David, CEO of Kolbe Corp, has lived and breathed the Kolbe Concept® his whole life. He is an
author, speaker, and visionary behind many of Kolbe’s products and innovations.
He is known for his ability to help business leaders unleash innovation through their people.
David has assisted thousands of professionals through seminars and speaking engagements
on topics such as hiring, organizational design and team building. His expertise in legal,
financial, intellectual property and management issues gives him an edge when turning
innovation into profit. David’s lasting mark on Kolbe Corp began with helping to develop the
original algorithm for the company’s flagship Kolbe ATM Index. Along with Kolbe Corp
President Amy Bruske, David penned Do More, More Naturally, the go-to guide for effortless
success.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights:
https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article:
https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client:
https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions


Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

The Habit Swap: What Leaders Dropped and the Outcomes

by

The Habit Swap: What Leaders Dropped and the Outcomes

Every great leader has a graveyard of old habits: the ones they buried on purpose because they finally admitted the cost was higher than the payoff.

We asked founders, CEOs, and VPs a deceptively simple question: “In the last few years, what leadership habit did you consciously kill—and what did you replace it with?”

The answers are refreshingly unpolished. No one brags about working harder. Instead, they confess to dropping the very things they once wore as badges of honor: constant cheerleading, answering every message themselves, micromanaging $50 repairs, forcing consensus, back-to-back 15-minute meetings, and the guilt of not always being “on.”

What replaced them isn’t softer leadership—it’s sharper, more human, and dramatically more effective.

The proof is in retention jumps of 34–40%, revenue growth of 40%, and leaders who finally have bandwidth to think instead of just reacting.

Read on!

Meghan Calhoun
Co-Founder, Give River

Dropped: The exhausting habit of trying to be everyone’s cheerleader all the time.

As a former TV host, I thought constant enthusiasm was leadership—celebrating every small win, sending motivational messages daily, and being the eternal optimist even when teams were struggling.

Adopted: Strategic recognition tied to core values. Instead of generic praise, I started using our Team Tags system at Give River to acknowledge specific behaviors that align with company values.

When someone demonstrates collaboration, I call it out specifically rather than just saying “great job.”

The shift was dramatic.

Our client teams report 32% higher performance when recognition is value-specific versus generic praise.

More importantly, I stopped burning myself out trying to manufacture positivity.

My energy became authentic, focused on meaningful moments rather than surface-level cheerleading.

The cemetery sales experience taught me this—grieving families didn’t need fake enthusiasm, they needed genuine recognition of their loss and specific guidance.
The same principle applies to workplace leadership.

People crave authentic acknowledgment of their actual contributions, not empty motivation.

Fake Cheerleading Is Exhausting Leadership

Dave Brocious
Executive Leader, Sky Point Crane

Dropped: Trying to respond to every customer inquiry personally within minutes.

I used to pride myself on answering my phone immediately and handling every quote request myself – it was killing my ability to focus on strategic growth at Sky Point Crane.

Adopted: Building systems that let my team be responsive without me being the bottleneck.

We implemented CRM automation and trained multiple team members to handle quotes and customer communications with the same urgency I demanded of myself.

The outcome was dramatic – our quote response time actually improved from hours to under 30 minutes, while I gained 15+ hours weekly to focus on major account development.

Revenue grew 40% year-over-year because I could finally spend time on the relationships and deals that truly needed executive attention, rather than micromanaging every customer touchpoint.

The lesson: Being responsive doesn’t mean being personally involved in every interaction. Systems-driven responsiveness scales; personal heroics don’t.

Heroic Availability Killed Growth

Daniel Rivera
Owner, Proactive Property Management

Dropped: Micromanaging maintenance requests. I used to want approval on every repair, even $50 plumbing fixes, thinking it showed fiscal responsibility.

Adopted: Empowering my team with pre-approved spending limits up to $300 for urgent repairs.

When a tenant in Newark reported a Sunday evening plumbing emergency, my team dispatched help within an hour without waiting for my approval.

The outcome was dramatic – our average repair response time dropped from 2-3 days to same-day service.

Tenant retention jumped 40% because residents felt prioritized.

Property owners actually preferred this approach since faster repairs prevent small issues from becoming expensive problems.

The key insight: trying to control every decision creates bottlenecks that hurt everyone.

Setting clear boundaries and trusting your team delivers better results than hovering over every choice.

$50 Repairs Don’t Need My Signature

Sean Swain
Owner, Detroit Furnished Rentals LLC

Dropped: Micromanaging every detail of my short-term rental operations.

I used to personally handle every guest message, cleaning schedule, and maintenance request across all seven Detroit properties, thinking I was maintaining quality control.

Adopted: Implementing automated systems while focusing on strategic partnerships.

I invested in property management software that handles 80% of guest communications automatically, and built relationships with local hospitals and corporate housing agencies for steady bookings.

The results were immediate and measurable.

My occupancy rate jumped to 100% for budget rooms under $50/night, and I secured consistent corporate contracts with traveling nurses.

Most importantly, I freed up 15+ hours weekly that I now spend on expanding the business and improving guest experiences rather than answering repetitive check-in questions.

The automation didn’t hurt the personal touch—it improved it.

Guests now get instant responses 24/7, while I can focus on the unique touches that matter, like our custom neon signs and arcade game areas that guests rave about in reviews.

Micromanaging Messages Lost Me Weekends

Joseph Lopez
Founder, AZ IV Medics

Dropped: Micromanaging our mobile IV nurses’ daily schedules and appointment approaches.

I used to obsess over every patient interaction detail, thinking tighter control meant better outcomes.

Adopted: Trust-based autonomy with clear outcome metrics.

Our RNs and paramedics now manage their own routes and patient care approaches, while I focus on tracking what matters—patient satisfaction scores and treatment effectiveness.

The results were immediate and measurable.

Our customer retention jumped 34% within six months, and we expanded from Phoenix to five states.

Our team now handles 40% more appointments weekly because they’re not waiting for my approval on routine decisions.

Most importantly, our online reviews improved dramatically—patients started specifically mentioning how confident and empowered our nurses seemed.

When you stop hovering over skilled professionals, they deliver their best work naturally.

Hovering Nurses Hurt Patient Love

Erin Talbot
Founder, Farrell Talbot Consulting

I consciously dropped the habit of feeling guilty for not always being “on.”

As a business owner, I used to tie my value to that, but I realized that sustainable leadership means setting boundaries, prioritizing family and personal time and that has made me more present, creative, and strategic for my clients.

At the same time, I adopted a consistent habit of daily touchpoints with clients.

I know this might seem contradictory to what I just said.

But, whether it’s sharing an idea, checking in on media results, or flagging an opportunity. It’s a small gesture that builds trust and reminds them I’m thinking about their business.

It has built stronger ships, better client retention and a more grounded version of leadership.

Drop Guilt, Embrace Daily Wins

Neel Somani
Founder & CEO, Eclipse

One leadership habit I dropped was scheduling back-to-back 15 minute meetings.

I used to do this in an effort for efficiency. What I found is that meetings were often rushed or cut short, and we were better off without the meeting at all.

Now, if I schedule a meeting, it’s still 15 minutes, but they’re not back-to-back, and I’m prepared to run over.

After all, I minimize how many meetings I take to begin with. I’ve found greater depth in my interactions.

A habit I adopted was the principles in the book “Nonviolent Communication”. This book is widely recommended by Satya Nadella at Microsoft.

The book encourages the reader to identify and share what they are feeling, and also to guess how their conversational partner is feeling. I’ve had fewer misunderstandings since then.

Back-to-Back 15s Were Fake Efficiency

Monika Malan
Leadership Roles, She Leads Boldly

After my baby was born, I realized I could no longer rely on sheer grit and long hours to get things done.

I consciously dropped the habit of doing everything myself and started prioritizing more ruthlessly, focusing only on what truly moved the needle.

I also began relying more on others: delegating, trusting, and shifting from being the doer to being the leader.

The outcome? My team grew in confidence and capability, and I became a more strategic, less overwhelmed leader.

Letting go wasn’t easy, but it made me better.

Now, as a coach, I help other emerging female leaders do the same – trade perfectionism for clarity, and hustle for healthy leadership habits that actually move their careers forward.

Motherhood Forced Me to Delegate

Julia Epstein
VP, Estee Lauder Companies

From Consensus-Seeking to Clear Decision-Making

I let go of the need to build consensus on every decision.

Instead, I adopted a habit of clarity: stating when I needed input from the team vs. when a decision is final and the rationale behind it.

This built trust, increased transparency, and accelerated delivery timelines while still honoring collaboration.

Consensus Was Slowing Everything Down

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Discover the latest HR Tips and trends with our weekly newsletters!

Restoring Order: How HR Can Address a Decline in Workplace Discipline

by

Restoring Order: How HR Can Address a Decline in Workplace Discipline

Somewhere along the way, “discipline” became a dirty word in workplaces: it sounded punitive, old-school, even toxic.

Yet when tardiness, missed deadlines, and half-hearted effort creep in, everyone feels the pain, teams, customers, and bottom lines.

For this HR Spotlight feature, we went straight to the people who actually fix it: HR leaders, CEOs, and consultants who have turned around slipping standards without turning into wardens.

Their answers are surprisingly unanimous: the fastest way to restore discipline isn’t more rules or write-ups, it’s clearer expectations, better-equipped managers, and systems that make the right behavior the easiest behavior.

Punishment is the last resort, not the starting point.

The real levers are transparency, coaching, recognition, and (yes) automation that removes friction instead of adding shame.

Here’s exactly how they did it, step by step, with zero corporate jargon.

Read on!

Marc Ragsdale
CEO, Kaamfu

The key to improving employee discipline is shifting away from reminders and reprimands by supervisors which frustrate everyone, and toward automated monitoring, coaching, and performance gamification.

The most effective approach is to implement a system that continuously tracks performance against clear expectations and reports insights back to employees in real time.

When workers can see their progress and receive guided feedback, discipline becomes self-driven rather than enforced.

This turns managers from enforcers into coaches and transforms discipline from a burden into a culture of continuous improvement.

At Kaamfu, we’ve built AI-driven supervisory mechanisms that automate accountability without depleting morale.

Let AI Supervise, Humans Coach

John Baldino
President, Humareso

When discipline drops, the issue often isn’t the employees.

It’s the clarity and confidence of their leaders. Supervisors and managers haven’t always been equipped to handle discipline well, and that gap shows.

HR’s first step should be helping them think in terms of corrective action rather than punishment.

We’re still addressing behaviors that need to change, but we’re doing so in a way that builds direction instead of resentment.

Start by reinforcing expectations through transparent conversations, consistent feedback, and modeled accountability from leadership.

When people understand the why behind standards and see correction as support, not a penalty, discipline naturally improves

Discipline Starts with Confident Leaders

Kyle Lagunas
Founder & Principal, Kyle & Co

If performance is slipping, don’t jump to blame employees—start by asking if managers have what they need to lead.

Too often, managers are caught between policy and practice with little support.

HR can’t just hand over a handbook and expect consistency. We have to equip managers with the tools, training, and trust to lead conversations around performance—early, clearly, and with empathy.

Accountability doesn’t happen from the top down. It’s modeled in the middle.

When managers are confident and supported, they can lead with intention—and what used to be a disciplinary moment becomes a trust-building opportunity.

That’s how we create consistency. That’s how we lead with impact

Managers Need Tools, Not Just Rules

Katherine Hosie
CEO, Powerhouse Coaching

The key is advance transparency and consistent follow-through.

When people know the consequences in advance, they can make informed choices and live with them.

Second chances are only appropriate when expectations weren’t clear; a “boundary error”. If expectations were clear and someone still crosses the line, that’s not a misunderstanding – it’s a “boundary violation”.

This approach is fair, reduces ambiguity, and restores respect.

When needed, consequences should be public.

This reinforces standards, reduces ambiguity, and reminds others that expectations apply to everyone.

Not to shame anyone, but so others understand the line that was crossed and what followed.

Clear Lines, Public Consequences

R. Karl Hebenstreit
Organization Development Consultant, Perform & Function

As a certified executive coach, leadership/team/organization development consultant, and Enneagram practitioner, I look at this through a motivation and engagement lens.

If an employee is not passionate about the work they’re doing (or being asked to do), and there are no meaningful incentives to do or not do the work, they are unlikely to do it.

Daniel Pink broke down the motivation formula into: autonomy + mastery + purpose, where autonomy is the freedom and entrustment to do the work without micromanagement and constant authoritarian direction; mastery is the opportunity to grow, develop, and become an expert in your chosen area/field/discipline; and purpose is the alignment of the work to your own values and raison d’être.

I like to break it down even further, by deep diving into the individual nuances and insights provided by the Enneagram.

Each one of us will resonate with one/some of these more than others, based on our lifelong core motivation.

Ensuring that the work is aligned to the one(s) of greatest importance to each employee, will result in an engaged, motivated, productive, and satisfied workforce:

– Alignment with core values, ensuring that they are doing the right thing with a focus on quality and excellence

– Opportunities to help others (colleagues, customers, stakeholders) and see the impact of that contribution

– Alignment, understanding, and resonance with the ultimate expected goal to be achieved, and the rewards associated with doing so

– Opportunity to be, and appreciated for, unique, authentic, genuine, different, special, creative

– Opportunity to master chosen discipline, field and continue growth and learning within it

– Feeling safe, comfortable, secure, included in the safety of a tribe, and trusting of leadership

– Opportunities to pursue options of interest and excitement, without feeling stifled or constrained

– A clear span of authority/control, with the autonomy to execute/expand accordingly

A sense of peace, harmony, and balance, without conflict.

Motivation Beats Micromanagement Every Time

Scott Purcell
Co-Founder, Man of Many

When discipline falters, clear and consistent communication about expectations is the first line of defence—HR should pair this with open feedback channels and recognition for positive conduct.

At Man of Many, we’ve found that a well-defined set of values, regular check-ins, and professional development opportunities can shift the culture back towards accountability and pride in results.

Discipline is less about punitive action than it is about cultivating alignment and clarity at every level.”

My credentials include being a CFA Charterholder and being named Publish Leader of the Year, and our publication, Man of Many, has won Website of the Year.

I focus on team management, business strategy, and workforce culture in a fast-paced publishing environment.

Values + Check-Ins Fix Sloppy Standards

Tina Schust Robinson
CEO, WorkJoy

Start by defining what “discipline” means in your organization.

Think beyond rule enforcement to the everyday behaviors that keep your mission and strategy on track.

HR can help managers translate that definition into action by coaching them to set clear expectations and give feedback that’s specific, behavioral, and linked to outcomes.

When improvement doesn’t happen, consequences must follow so accountability holds weight.

When it does, acknowledge it publicly and meaningfully.

Recognizing progress strengthens the very habits that drive execution.

Discipline, at its best, is how an organization stays aligned, consistent, and focused on results.

Define Discipline Before You Enforce It

Peju Akintorin
Founder, Career Thrive

When employee discipline declines, it is imperative that HR look beyond the surface behaviours and address the root causes.

Using the S.H.I.F.T framework, there are 5 clear steps that HR can implement to address and improve the issue.

S – Set clear expectations – (Re)establish expectations by reviewing policies, performance standards, and codes of conduct to ensure they’re communicated and consistently enforced.

H- Hone in on leadership – Discipline issues can stem from inconsistent leadership or unclear priorities.
Equip leaders to model accountability and have constructive conversations with their teams.

I – Identify positive behaviours – Create systems to recognize and reward positive behaviours

F – Feedback analysis – Gather the facts, analyze underlying issues. Identify patterns and implement required changes.

T – Training and coaching – Help employees rebuild engagement and ownership, especially if poor discipline stems from burnout or low morale.

Using this 5-step framework helps to establish clear structures and systems and maintain sustainable results.

Five Letters to Rebuild Accountability

Janine M. Mathó
Founder & CEO, Janine Mathó International

If ’employee discipline’ is declining, the real question HR should ask is: What conditions are contributing to disengagement, inconsistency, or underperformance?

Blaming employees only hides the real problems.

Instead, look systemically: Are expectations clear?

Are leaders modeling both accountability and care?

Are employees burned out, checked out, or unclear on priorities?

Rather than defaulting to punitive measures, HR can lead a reset—clarifying values and behaviors, co-creating norms with teams, investing in development that fosters trust and accountability, and, critically, supporting leaders in cultivating a psychologically safe environment.

When people feel seen, respected, and connected to a shared purpose, discipline becomes less about enforcement and more about alignment.

Fix the System, Not the People

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Discover the latest HR Tips and trends with our weekly newsletters!

Employee Resistance: HR Policies Suffering Push Back

by

Employee Resistance: HR Policies Suffering Push Back

Every company has that one policy that makes even the best employees groan: daily equipment inspections, return-to-office mandates, mandatory progress check-ins, non-competes, documentation rules, report deadlines, phone bans, or transparent promotion scorecards.

In this HR Spotlight roundup, nine founders and CEOs who’ve actually enforced these “hated” rules reveal the surprising truth: the pushback almost never comes from laziness—it comes from feeling micromanaged, distrusted, or robbed of something they value deeply (time, autonomy, recognition, privacy).

More importantly, they share exactly how they flipped the script: by showing the personal upside (fewer breakdowns, faster promotions, no 2 a.m. emergencies, protected paychecks) instead of preaching compliance.

The result? Resistance didn’t just quiet down—it vanished.

Here are the raw stories and tactics that turned policy villains into team heroes.

Read on!

Jeffrey J. Miller
President & CEO, Kelbe Brothers Equipment

I run a fourth-generation equipment company in Wisconsin, so I’ve dealt with plenty of policy resistance over the years.

The one that gets the most pushback? Mandatory daily walkaround inspections before operating any equipment.

Operators hate it because they see it as paperwork that slows them down when they could be working.

They think they know their machine well enough to skip the checklist.

But we tracked downtime costs and found that crews doing daily inspections caught small issues early–saving an average of $3,200 per incident versus emergency repairs.

When a hydraulic leak gets spotted during a walkaround instead of mid-job, that’s the difference between a $150 seal replacement and a $4,000 pump failure plus lost rental revenue.

I addressed it by showing operators the actual repair invoices from machines that skipped inspections versus those that didn’t.
I also pointed out that they’re the ones stuck waiting when a machine goes down unexpectedly, losing productive hours.

Once they saw it wasn’t about compliance but about avoiding sitting around while a tech drives out for an emergency call, resistance dropped significantly.

The key was making it about their time and their day, not company policy. Nobody wants to be the operator who caused a three-day shutdown because they didn’t spend two minutes checking fluid levels.

Two Minutes Saves $3,200 Breakdowns

Charles Blechman
Founder & Coach, Manhattan Coaching Associates

I’ve coached dozens of tech leaders through organizational change, and the policy that creates the most friction is return-to-office mandates.

I watched one Director nearly quit over it–not because he hated the office, but because the policy ignored why remote work mattered to him: picking his kids up from school and being present during their formative years.

The resistance isn’t really about the policy itself.

It’s about what the policy steps on–autonomy, trust, family time, work-life integration.

When I work with leaders implementing these changes, I ask them to get curious instead of defensive: What values are being threatened here? What’s the fear underneath the pushback?

One client shifted their approach by asking employees directly: “What would you need to feel supported if we move to hybrid?”

They found people weren’t against collaboration–they were against losing flexibility without gaining anything meaningful in return.

So they redesigned the policy around team anchoring days and core hours, giving people choice within structure.

The fix isn’t better communication of the policy.
It’s co-creating a solution that honors what people actually care about.
When employees feel heard and see their values reflected in the outcome, resistance drops dramatically.

RTO Died When They Co-Created Hybrid

Lisa Martinez
Founder, TX Cash Home Buyers

Honestly, non-competes are our biggest hurdle, especially with a small team where people want freedom to move on.

I stopped just handing them the contract.

Now I explain exactly what we’re protecting, like our client list or specific methods.

If someone has a good reason, like moving across the country, we’ll adjust it.

People are way more receptive when they understand the business reason behind the rule.

Non-Competes Work When Explained Honestly

Joseph Depena
Owner, VP Fitness

I run a boutique fitness franchise in Providence, and the policy that gets the most pushback is mandatory progress tracking and check-ins.

Members sign up excited to train, but when we require regular weigh-ins, body measurements, or goal reviews, some push back hard–they see it as intrusive or feel judged.

Here’s what changed the resistance: I stopped framing it as accountability and started showing members their own data trends over 8-12 weeks.

When someone sees their strength gains climbing even though the scale hasn’t moved, or their body fat percentage dropping while weight stays flat, suddenly tracking becomes their favorite thing.

One member was ready to quit after “no progress” until we pulled up her metrics–she’d gained 4 pounds of muscle and lost 2 inches off her waist.

The trick is making the data work for them, not against them.

I tell my trainers to celebrate non-scale victories, first–better sleep, more energy, clothes fitting differently–then layer in the numbers as proof of what they already feel.

Once people realize tracking protects them from quitting prematurely, resistance drops to almost zero.

Hated Weigh-Ins Became Victory Proof

Divyansh Agarwal
Founder, Webyansh

I run a web design agency, not an HR department, but I’ve watched clients struggle with one surprising policy pushback: requiring teams to document their work processes.

Developers and designers especially hate it because it feels like busywork that slows them down.

When we rebuilt Hopstack’s website, their team initially resisted documenting the CMS transfer process–they just wanted to move fast.

But we insisted on creating a simple handover doc, and it saved them weeks when they needed to train new team members six months later.

The 99.8% order accuracy they maintain now partly comes from that documentation culture we helped establish.

The fix isn’t selling it as “policy compliance”–it’s showing immediate personal benefit. For Hopstack, we framed it as “so you don’t get 2am calls about broken features you built months ago.

When people see documentation as protecting their own time rather than feeding corporate bureaucracy, resistance drops fast.

I’ve noticed this same pattern across healthcare and SaaS clients–the policy itself isn’t the problem, it’s that nobody explains what’s in it for the individual employee.

Make it selfish, make it practical, and suddenly compliance isn’t a fight anymore.

Docs Sold as “No 2am Calls”

Joshua McAfee
CEO & Founder, McAfee Institute

I’ve trained thousands of investigators and law enforcement professionals, and the policy that gets the most resistance? Mandatory reporting documentation requirements.

Investigators especially hate being told they need to submit detailed reports within 24-48 hours of an incident when they’re in the middle of active casework.

When I built Amazon’s Loss Prevention program from scratch, we tracked what happened when investigators delayed their reports.

Cases that got documented within 24 hours had a 76% prosecution success rate.

Cases documented after 72 hours? That dropped to 41%.

The resistance vanished when investigators realized they were the ones stuck in court explaining gaps in their own timeline months later.

I addressed it by showing actual court transcripts where delayed documentation killed cases they’d worked for weeks.

Then I implemented voice-to-text report templates that cut documentation time from 45 minutes to under 10.

Suddenly it wasn’t about compliance–it was about not watching their own hard work get dismissed because they couldn’t remember exact details three months later during testimony.

The shift happened when people saw that the policy protects their credibility, not just the organization’s liability.

Nobody wants to be the investigator who loses a case on the stand because their notes were too vague to defend.

24-Hour Reports Saved 76% of Cases

Christina Imes
Founder, Tru Integrative Wellness

I run two integrative wellness clinics, so I’m managing clinical teams across multiple locations–and the biggest pushback I consistently see is around our strict patient confidentiality and personal phone policies.

Staff want to snap before/after photos or share success stories on their personal social media, but in medical aesthetics and hormone therapy, that’s a legal and ethical minefield.

When I took over operations at Tru Integrative Wellness in 2022, we had team members who didn’t understand why they couldn’t post a great GAINSWave result or weight loss change–even with verbal permission.

The resistance was intense because they genuinely wanted to celebrate patient wins and felt the policy killed their ability to market our work.

What actually worked was giving them an approved outlet.

We created a formal content process where patients could consent through proper medical release forms, and then our marketing team handled all posts through official channels.

I also showed staff the actual dollar cost of a HIPAA violation ($50,000+ per incident) during onboarding.

Once they saw we weren’t blocking their enthusiasm but protecting everyone’s livelihood, compliance jumped to near-100%.

The trick is replacing what you’re taking away. Don’t just say “no personal posts”–give them a compliant way to share wins and explain the real financial risk in concrete numbers they’ll remember.

$50K Fines Killed Personal Patient Pics

Matthew Pfau
Curriculum Developer & Educator, Paralegal Institute

I run a personal injury law firm and hire a lot of paralegals, so I’ve seen this from the employer side. The policy that gets the most pushback? Structured career advancement criteria.

When I implemented clear promotion requirements with specific skill benchmarks, my experienced paralegals initially resisted because it felt like being “graded” again after years of proven work.

The resistance came from a place I didn’t expect–they thought documenting their skills somehow diminished the value of their experience.

One senior paralegal told me straight up: “I’ve been doing this for 8 years, why do I need to check boxes now?”

What changed everything was when I showed them the other side.

I had been promoting people inconsistently based on gut feeling, and it meant some high performers were getting overlooked while others advanced just because they were more vocal.

When I laid out the transparent criteria, three paralegals who’d been stuck at the same level for years suddenly had a clear path forward–and two of them got promoted within six months.

Now when I hire, I show candidates the advancement scorecard on day one. The pushback disappeared because people realized it protects them more than it restricts them.

Without clear criteria, career growth is just a popularity contest.

Scorecards Ended Promotion Popularity Contests

Cyrus Partow
CEO, ShipTheDeal

My remote team used to stumble through handoffs. We were basically working on different planets.

So we tried setting two hours every day when everyone had to be online. It fixed everything.

Handoffs went from a chain of emails to a quick chat.

My advice is to not frame it as a management thing. Just say it’s to make their day easier, then stick to it.

Short, consistent, and it helps everyone.

Two Overlap Hours Fixed Handoff Hell

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Discover the latest HR Tips and trends with our weekly newsletters!

Unpopular HR Policies: Turning Pushback Into Progress

by

Unpopular HR Policies: Turning Pushback Into Progress

What if the HR policy you’re defending with spreadsheets and compliance checklists is secretly the biggest threat to the culture you’re trying to protect?

Across industries, one uncomfortable pattern repeats: the rules designed to safeguard organizations often feel like handcuffs to the very people they’re meant to empower.

This HR Spotlight dares to ask the question most leaders avoid: are we enforcing policies—or are we enforcing distrust?

From mandatory reporting to bilingual mandates, from weekend response rules to personal goal-setting programs, seasoned leaders reveal the policies that ignite the fiercest pushback—and the surprisingly human fixes that flipped resistance into ownership.

Their stories prove one thing: when employees understand the “why,” see the win, and feel the respect, even the toughest policies become the glue that holds high-performing teams together.

In 2025’s war for talent, these lessons are pure gold.

Read on!

John Howley
Managing Partner, Howley Law Firm

After 30+ years in litigation, the policy that gets the hardest pushback is mandatory harassment reporting–especially when employees think they’re protecting a colleague by staying quiet.

I’ve seen these cases that should’ve been slam-dunks, because by the time people finally report, the evidence is stale and witnesses have scattered.

I had a case where a harassed nanny eventually won $1 million, but it took two years longer than it should have because her friends at the agency knew what was happening and said nothing.

They thought they were being loyal.

When we finally built the case, those same coworkers became crucial witnesses–but if they’d reported early, she could’ve been protected immediately and avoided months of hell.

What works is showing the math.

In my $80 million race discrimination case against Sodexho Marriott, the company’s own failure to enforce their reporting policy created a paper trail that made our job easier.

I tell HR: frame reporting as protecting coworkers, not snitching on them, because silence lets bad actors hurt more people.

When employees see that early reporting actually shortens investigations and gets faster resolutions, resistance drops fast.

Report Early, Protect Everyone

Lucas Simmons
CEO, Gener8 Media

I ran production teams at Gener8 Media and honestly? The biggest pushback wasn’t an HR policy–it was the creative approval process.

Directors and editors hated having clients review cuts at multiple stages, saying it “killed the creative vision” and added weeks to timelines.

The breaking point came during our Unseen Chains documentary about human trafficking.

One of my editors wanted full creative control until final delivery, but I insisted on showing rough cuts to Drive 4 Impact throughout.

He pushed back hard, saying it would compromise the artistry.

Then during a mid-production review, the nonprofit caught a factual error about trafficking statistics that would’ve destroyed our credibility if it made the final cut. That one catch saved the entire $180K project.

I started showing the team our client retention numbers–we had 87% repeat business specifically because clients felt involved in the process, not surprised at the end.

When crew members saw that their jobs existed because of this policy, not despite it, resistance dropped fast.

Now I frame client reviews as “insurance against expensive reshoots” and suddenly it’s not an annoying policy, it’s protecting everyone’s paycheck.

The shift happened when I stopped defending it as policy and started showing real money saved. Numbers change minds faster than principles.

Client Reviews Save Jobs

Jeff Bogue
President, Momentum Ministry Partners

Leading a 150+ person staff across eight campuses, the biggest pushback I’ve consistently seen is around scheduling flexibility–specifically when we implemented mandatory all-staff gatherings.

People want autonomy over their calendars, and asking ministry professionals to block out non-negotiable meeting times felt controlling to many.

What shifted the resistance was changing how we communicated the “why.”

Instead of announcing “mandatory staff meetings,” we reframed them as “team days” and showed our budget–we were investing $12,000 in bringing everyone together because we believed in them.

When people saw we were spending real money because we valued unity and development, attendance jumped from 70% to 94% within three months.

The real breakthrough came when I started sharing specific stories of what happened because we gathered.

A youth pastor met a finance team member at one of these events, which led to a conversation that solved a budget problem plaguing his department for months.

Staff started seeing these gatherings as networking gold rather than time theft.

My recommendation: stop defending the policy and start showcasing the tangible wins that come from it.

Collect three stories in the first 60 days of implementation where the policy directly solved a problem or created an opportunity. Resistance fades when people see proof, not principles.

Team Days Beat Mandatory Meetings

Seth Yingling
Owner, Yingling Builders

Hey, I run a custom home building company in West Central Illinois, and while I don’t deal with traditional HR policies, I’ve steered plenty of pushback on construction standards and building protocols–the parallels are pretty similar.

The biggest resistance I see is when people don’t understand why a rule exists.

When I introduced stricter quality checkpoints and required more frequent inspections with our builds, my team initially saw it as slowing them down.

But once I explained that these steps prevented costly callbacks and protected our reputation (which directly affected their job security), the pushback disappeared. People resist what they don’t understand.

My recommendation: involve your team in the conversation before rolling out the policy.

When we switched to Wausau Home Products in 2021, I didn’t just announce it–I showed the crew actual examples of how it made their work easier and reduced errors. That buy-in made all the difference.

Also, admit when something isn’t working and adjust.

We tried a new scheduling system last year that looked great on paper but created chaos on job sites. I scrapped it within two weeks.

Your credibility goes way up when people see you’re willing to listen and adapt rather than forcing something that clearly isn’t right.

Explain Why, Resistance Dies

D.J. Hearsey
Principal Agent, Select Insurance Group

I’ve built Select Insurance Group from the ground up with 12 locations across the Southeast, and the HR policy that creates the most friction? Mandatory bilingual capability requirements for customer-facing roles–especially in markets where we’re expanding.

When we moved into new territories in Georgia and the Carolinas, some existing staff pushed back hard on needing Spanish-speaking team members at every location.

They’d argue “this isn’t Miami” or question why we couldn’t just route calls elsewhere. The tension was real because it felt like their advancement opportunities were being limited.

What changed the conversation was showing them our Orlando retention numbers.

At our Florida offices where agents like Natalie Rivera and Diana Estrada handled both English and Spanish clients seamlessly, our customer lifetime value was 2.3x higher than English-only locations.

More importantly, those bilingual agents were closing 40% more policies per month because they could serve walk-ins that other agencies in the area were turning away.

I made it a growth opportunity instead of a gate.

We started offering paid Spanish classes during work hours and gave bonuses for certification milestones.

Three agents who initially complained the loudest are now our top performers in Virginia because they invested six months learning conversational Spanish.

When your team sees bilingual colleagues getting bigger commission checks and better reviews, resistance turns into enrollment.

Bilingual Bonus Ends Complaints

Orrin Klopper
CEO, Netsurit

I’ve been running Netsurit for nearly 30 years with over 300 employees across three continents, and the policy that creates the most friction?

Personal goal-setting programs–especially when they’re mandatory.

When we launched our Dreams Program, about 40% of our team initially resisted.

They’d say “I don’t want my boss in my personal life” or “my goals are private.”

The pushback came from fear that we’d judge their ambitions or use personal information against them in performance reviews.

What changed everything was making it employee-owned, not management-driven.

We let staff choose their own accountability partners (not their direct managers), and we funded their goals without requiring detailed justifications.

One team member wanted to learn guitar–we paid for lessons, no questions asked. Another wanted to run a marathon–we covered the training program and race fees.

The key was proving through action that this wasn’t a corporate manipulation tactic.

When people saw coworkers actually achieving personal dreams with company support, and zero strings attached, resistance dropped to almost nothing.

Now it’s one of our most valued benefits, but only because we gave up control and made it genuinely about them, not us.

Fund Dreams, Resistance Vanishes

Pleasant Lewis
Owner, Fitness CF

I’ve been running fitness centers in Florida for over 40 years, so I’ve seen my share of policy pushback.

The one that gets the most resistance? Mandatory customer feedback collection after every member interaction.

My front desk staff and trainers initially hated it because they felt like they were being constantly watched and judged.

They’d say “I already know my members are happy, why do we need another survey?”

But when we implemented our Medallia feedback system across Fitness CF locations, we found members were reporting issues staff assumed were fine–like equipment wait times during peak hours or confusing class schedules.

I sat down with the team and showed them real member comments where someone said “I almost cancelled, but then Sarah helped me find morning classes that fit my schedule.”

Suddenly they realized feedback wasn’t about catching mistakes–it was about celebrating wins and spotting problems before members walk out the door.

Our retention jumped because we could fix things in real-time instead of wondering why people didn’t renew.

The key was reframing it from “Big Brother watching” to “here’s proof your work matters.”

When a trainer sees a member specifically mention them in positive feedback, that changes everything.

Now my staff asks members to fill out surveys because they want that recognition.

Feedback Becomes Paycheck Proof

Brooks Humphreys
Founder, 614 HomeBuyers

People complain the most about attendance policies that mess with their flexible schedules.

At least around here. From our time in real estate, we learned that if you give people autonomy with clear expectations, you get fewer problems and they seem more into it.

My advice? Explain why the policy exists, then ask for their input. It almost always leads to a solution everyone can live with.

Flexible Schedules Beat Rigid Attendance Rules

Matthew Runyon
Partner, EMC Remodeling

I run a family roofing and remodeling company in Temple, TX, and honestly, the policy that gets the most pushback isn’t what you’d expect–it’s our mandatory 24-hour response acknowledgment for emergency calls, even on weekends. My guys hated it at first because they felt like they could never fully disconnect.

The real issue was they thought “acknowledgment” meant immediate dispatch.

I fixed the resistance by being crystal clear: acknowledge within an hour, but actual emergency work gets assigned by rotation and severity.

We track it simply–a quick text saying “Got it, evaluating now” counts. Since making that change, our complaint rate dropped to almost zero because the crew realized it’s 30 seconds of their time, not their whole weekend.

What made it stick was showing them our Google reviews. Before the policy, we had angry customers posting about “no one picking up during storms.” After? Our reviews jumped from 4.2 to 4.8 stars in six months, and I tied a quarterly bonus directly to maintaining that rating.

Suddenly everyone was fast on responses because it literally showed up in their paychecks.

The pattern I’ve seen: people resist policies when the “why” feels like it only benefits the company.

Link it to something they personally win from–reputation, tips, bonuses, fewer angry customer interactions–and resistance turns into buy-in fast.

Quick Texts Save Weekend Peace

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Discover the latest HR Tips and trends with our weekly newsletters!

Rebuilding Trust: An HR Leader’s Guide to Post-Layoff Recovery

by

Rebuilding Trust: An HR Leader's Guide to Post-Layoff Recovery

When the layoff dust settles, the real crisis often begins—not among those who left, but among those who stayed.

Why do the survivors suddenly feel like the next target?

Why does trust evaporate overnight, and productivity quietly implodes?

This HR Spotlight dares to ask the question most leaders whisper in private: how do you heal a workforce that just watched its friends disappear?

From peer support circles to hormone panels for stress, from “Mission Moments” that re-anchor purpose to ruthless transparency about workload, seasoned HR pros and CEOs reveal the exact moves that turned shell-shocked teams into resilient ones.

Their answers expose a startling truth: post-layoff recovery isn’t about pep talks or pizza parties—it’s about proving, in real time, that the company still sees, values, and fights for the people who remain.

Read on!

Peter Whealy
Chief Elevation Officer, Elevate Potential

HR should no longer be limited to the label “Human Resources.”

It should be the organization’s People & Potential function, the engine that strengthens capability, builds trust, and enables leaders and teams to thrive as the world changes.

Its role is to cultivate the conditions where people can grow, adapt, and perform at their best, especially in moments of uncertainty.

Modern HR is the steward of trust, capability, and organisational coherence.

It helps people see possibility amid ambiguity, builds the connective tissue between teams, and ensures the organisation learns faster than the world around it.

At its best, HR inspires the organisation to Elevate its Potential: strengthening leadership identity, amplifying team capability, and orchestrating systems that unlock enterprise-wide value.

It is the catalyst that keeps the organisation human, even as technology accelerates everything else.

HR Evolves into People & Potential Powerhouse

Alexandru Samoila
Head of Operations, Connect Vending

Layoffs are brutal for everyone involved — the employees who are let go, the ones who remain and the HR or managers who convey the message.

The shift in the culture and environment is almost instantaneous, as people keep second-guessing their performance and doubting their future.

As an operations manager, I have had to deal with such episodes throughout my career, and I have realized that being human, accessible and transparent is what matters the most.

Employees do not expect grand gestures in such situations, but they expect clarity about the future, which can only be brought in through individual and group check-ins, frank conversations and honesty.

I’ve also realized that employees need to hear the truth from senior leaders, so involving them in these conversations is essential to sustain trust.

The more you evade questions or delay, the more likely people are to look for new opportunities, so it’s important to assure your team timely and sincere in addressing their fears.

Transparency and Leadership Build Trust After Layoffs

Christina Imes
Founder, Tru Integrative Wellness

I’ve led teams through multiple restructures–sold a yoga studio, scaled a med spa from one room to multi-million dollars, and merged clinical operations at Tru.

The thing nobody talks about after layoffs is that survivor guilt manifests as physical symptoms.

I watched top performers at Refresh develop insomnia and digestive issues after we had to let people go during COVID, even though their jobs were secure.

HR needs to bring in someone who can address the physiological stress response–not just an EAP flyer.

When I was dealing with public speaking anxiety early in my career, my psychiatrist explained my body was stuck in hyperactive fight-or-flight. The same thing happens to teams post-layoff.

At Tru, we offer hormone panels because chronic stress destroys cortisol patterns and sleep quality, which tanks decision-making for months. Most companies ignore that their remaining employees are operating on broken biology.

The fastest fix I’ve seen: normalize the physical fallout.

In my teams, I explicitly tell people “if you’re sleeping poorly or feel nauseous before work, that’s your nervous system, not weakness–here’s how to address it.”

I’ve connected staff with our functional medicine providers who can run labs and prescribe short-term solutions.

Sounds clinical, but treating the body’s stress response is faster than waiting for therapy appointments that are booked six weeks out.

One concrete thing: offer baseline health screenings (sleep quality, stress biomarkers) within 72 hours of layoffs.

When people see their cortisol is actually lifted or their HRV is tanked, it validates what they’re feeling and gives them something actionable to fix instead of just sitting in dread.

Address Physical Stress Symptoms in Remaining Employees

Tim Johnson
CEO, BIZROK

I’ve led teams through some brutal transitions–military deployments, corporate restructuring, and helping build a startup that went through multiple pivots.

The one thing that consistently helped wasn’t what HR said, but what they actually did in the weeks after.

The most powerful move I’ve seen is creating structured peer support groups.

When I was working with dental practices going through mergers, we’d pair remaining team members with someone from another department for weekly 15-minute check-ins.

Not therapy sessions–just “how are you actually doing” conversations.

The practices that did this saw their productivity bounce back 40% faster than those that didn’t.

HR should also immediately clarify what career growth looks like now.

After layoffs, everyone assumes they’re stuck or next.

I had a practice owner who literally drew out the new org chart with empty boxes and said “here’s what we’re building toward in 6 months.”

Three people who were updating their resumes stayed and competed for those roles instead.

The other piece people miss: let survivors grieve.

One of my clients tried to force a “we’re stronger now” narrative the next day. Total disaster.

Give people 48-72 hours to process before pivoting to the future. Sounds soft, but ignoring it cost them two more voluntary departures within a month.

Peer Support Groups Accelerate Team Recovery

Skandashree Bali
CEO & Co-Founder, Pawland

In moments when employees have witnessed their co-workers being laid off, HR’s role goes far beyond policy and paperwork – it becomes an anchor for emotional safety and clarity.

At Pawland, we’ve learned that uncertainty can be more damaging than the layoff event itself, so HR must focus on compassion, transparency, and continuity of support.

The most effective assistance HR can provide includes:

Communicating the “why” with honesty and empathy
Avoiding vague corporate language helps employees understand the decisions were strategic, not personal – which reduces fear and speculation.

Creating safe spaces for expression
Whether through listening sessions, small-group conversations, or anonymous channels, employees need space to voice their concerns without judgment.

Reassuring the stability of remaining roles
Clear communication around next steps, priorities, and how team contributions are valued helps rebuild psychological security.

Supporting workload realignment, not silent expectation increases
After layoffs, HR can work with managers to redistribute tasks realistically rather than letting burnout compound emotional stress.

Making mental-health resources visible and destigmatized
Employees should know that it’s okay to seek help – and that doing so will not affect how their commitment is perceived.

At Pawland, we believe the defining moment of a company’s culture isn’t during growth – it’s during difficult decisions.

When HR supports people with honesty, respect, and humanity, employees don’t just feel secure – they feel valued.

Emotional Safety and Clarity Anchor Post-Layoff Culture

Hanna Koval
Global Talent Acquisition Specialist & Employment Specialist, Haldren

When layoffs hit, the employees who remain often experience what we call “survivor’s guilt.”

This refers to a mix of relief, anxiety, and uncertainty that can significantly impact morale and productivity.

HR teams have a critical responsibility to address these emotions head-on rather than hoping they’ll fade on their own.

First and foremost, transparency becomes your most valuable tool.

Employees need honest communication about why the layoffs happened and what the path forward looks like.

We’ve seen organizations stumble by going silent after layoffs, which only fuels rumors and erodes trust.

Schedule town halls, send clear written communications, and make leadership accessible for questions.

People can handle difficult truths far better than they can handle ambiguity.

Create safe spaces for employees to process their emotions.

This might mean bringing in counselors, offering expanded EAP services, or simply acknowledging in team meetings that it’s normal to feel unsettled.

When people lose colleagues they’ve worked alongside for years, they’re experiencing a form of grief. Validating those feelings rather than rushing past them shows genuine care.

Your HR team should also focus on workload management.

Remaining employees often worry they’ll be expected to absorb their former colleagues’ responsibilities without additional support or resources.

Have frank conversations about priorities, timelines, and what might need to be temporarily deprioritized. Burnout after layoffs creates a vicious cycle that can lead to more departures.

In our work helping organizations rebuild after transitions, we consistently see that the companies that recover strongest are those that reconnect employees to purpose.

Help your teams understand how their work contributes to stabilizing and growing the company. People need to feel they’re building toward something, not just surviving.

Finally, demonstrate your commitment to those who stayed through meaningful actions, whether that’s professional development opportunities, recognition programs, or involving them in shaping the organization’s next chapter.

Actions will always speak louder than reassuring words alone.

Transparency and Workload Management Rebuild Employee Morale

Susan Snipes
Head of People, Remote People

Generally, HR employees have a wide network, especially on LinkedIn.

They can share their affected co-worker’s resumes, highlight their skills and abilities, and promote them so fellow recruiters and HR leaders can approach them for relevant roles.

HR can also help their affected co-workers with optimizing resumes and show them how to do targeted job search.

HR Networks Help Affected Employees Find Opportunities

Aja Chavez
Executive Director, Mission Prep Healthcare

After our last round of layoffs, we found two things that actually helped people.

We ran workshops on identifying transferable skills, which helped folks get their bearings and see their options.

Peer support groups, especially with a mental health professional there to guide them, gave people a place to talk honestly about their anxieties. It showed people they weren’t alone.

HR should focus on these. They rebuild confidence better than anything else we tried.

Skills Workshops and Support Groups Rebuild Confidence

Aamer Jarg
Director, Talent Shark

Layoffs can make the remaining employees who are still there very upset, and they often feel anxious, guilty, and unsure about their own job security.

HR is important for keeping morale high and repairing trust once something like this happens.

HR should talk about how it affects people emotionally instead of avoiding the subject.

Clear communication from leaders helps people stop guessing and worrying.

Second, providing emotional support through private therapy or employee assistance programs (EAPs) lets employees know that their health and happiness are important.

Third, HR can help small groups talk to each other or have managers check in with employees so they can express their worries and feel more connected.

Finally, reminding employees of the company’s mission and showing them a clear strategy for the future helps them focus on stability and purpose again.

When HR shows empathy and is clear, it can turn uncertainty into renewed interest.

Empathy and Clear Communication Restore Employee Trust

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Discover the latest HR Tips and trends with our weekly newsletters!