Management

Leadership Habits: Dropping the Bad, Picking Up the Good

Leadership Habits: Dropping the Bad, Picking Up the Good

Effective leadership hinges on evolving habits to meet modern challenges. 

This HR Spotlight article compiles insights from business leaders and HR professionals on one leadership habit they intentionally dropped and one they adopted in recent years, along with the tangible outcomes. 

From abandoning over-control to embracing empowerment, or shifting from reactive availability to strategic clarity, these leaders reveal how purposeful changes drive success. 

Their approaches foster stronger teams, enhance efficiency, and build innovative cultures, providing practical lessons for leaders navigating today’s complex business landscape with intentionality, trust, and sustainable impact.

Read on!

I have slowly had to reprogram myself from certain leadership habits.

One habit in particular that I dropped was making myself constantly available to our agents. Leaving my calendar wide open assuming they would make meetings with me, and then feeling deflated when no one scheduled time with me. It led to burnout, blurred boundaries and small resentment that started to fester. In turn, I replaced it with the habit of protecting my time and energy.

Now I set clear availability windows and require agents to get on my calendar via my assistant. This way I can prioritize deep, intentional conversations over constant accessibility.

The direct outcome ended up being a win-win for everyone. I was able to take control of my calendar with less frustration, protect my peace and it created a healthier dynamic with the agents and gave me the capacity to focus on vision, strategy, and scaling our brokerage.

Protecting Time Boosts Leadership and Results

Aaron Kenny
Founder & HR Delivery Consultant, A1HR Consulting

I consciously dropped the habit of over-explaining decisions to my team in an attempt to gain buy-in.

While transparency is key, I realised I was diluting clarity by over-justifying every move. In its place, I adopted a habit of framing decisions around clear business priorities and trusting my team to engage or challenge constructively if needed.

The outcome? Quicker alignment, less second-guessing, and a stronger culture of accountability. This shift allowed me to lead with more conviction, and my team responded by stepping up with greater ownership and initiative.

Clarity and Trust Replace Over-Explaining

Corina Tham
Finance & Sales Director, Cheap Forex VPS

One leadership practice I intentionally let go of was micromanaging my team.

I found it hindered innovation, dampened enthusiasm, and stopped my team members from reaching their true capabilities. Instead, I embraced delegating responsibilities with confidence and offering clear direction from the outset. This shift cultivated a sense of ownership and responsibility among the group.

The result was increased efficiency, better-quality results, and a more energized and committed team dynamic.

Delegation Replaces Micromanagement for Growth

Oleksii Kratko
Founder & CEO, Snov

The habit I buried was treating my calendar like a Tetris game of back-to-back meetings, jamming every gap with “efficiency.”

In our early days, I’d review minor code commits between investor calls, mistaking motion for momentum. This created a culture of performative busyness where engineers stopped proposing wild ideas, fearing I’d micromanage execution.

Now, I practice “trust sprints”: quarterly experiments where I delegate one mission-critical project with zero oversight. Last quarter, I handed our team a blank check to rebuild our compliance engine, no approvals needed for 90 days. They returned with an AI architecture so elegant it reduced customer onboarding by 40%.

My team now sends Loom updates titled “Look what we built without asking!”, which are some of the proudest notifications I receive.

Sometimes leadership means removing yourself from the equation so brilliance can breathe.

Trust Sprints Empower Team Brilliance

Early on, I thought good leadership meant fast response times. Be available, be reactive, fix things in real-time. It nearly broke me. I was solving the same fires over and over because I wasn’t stepping back to notice why they kept happening.

Now, I log it. I watch for patterns. If it shows up more than once, it earns a place in the system. That shift is why DomiSource runs clean – and why I don’t get midnight calls anymore.

The direct outcome? Fewer “hero moments,” more sustainable execution. My team doesn’t need me in a panic. They need structure, and they get it.

Leadership is about being calm enough to build something that holds, with or without you.

Systematic Leadership Beats Fire-Fighting

Felicia Shakiba
CEO & Executive Coach, CPO PLAYBOOK

The habit I let go of: Always being available. I used to think responsiveness showed strong leadership, but it created bottlenecks and drained both me and my team.

The habit I adopted: Weekly time blocks for deep thinking—no meetings, no distractions. It’s now the most productive part of my week and has helped me make clearer, faster decisions.

That one shift set a new tone for how my clients lead too—especially during high-pressure growth or turnaround moments. When leaders model focus, the rest of the organization follows.

Time Blocking Improves Leadership Focus

Vanessa Anello
Certificate Program Strategist & Facilitator, Workforce Charm

I dropped the habit of trying to control team energy.

Not only was it ineffective, but it was exhausting. I used to try to micromanage momentum, especially as a Facilitator for live certificate programs and workshops (“Welcome, everyone! Let’s stay energized!”).

Now I lean into deliberately shaping the sensory and emotional cues of a room instead of dominating the conversation. This means using lighting, sound, spatial cues (props, material placement , camera angle, are my hands in the shot?- yes that matters, gallery view vs speaker view, using the reaction buttons, interactive tools, etc.) and even pauses to change how people feel.

It’s not just what they hear. I don’t harp on “Be on camera!!!”.

One unexpected benefit was that participation shot up in my workshops and our cert programs. The shift from message-driven to energy-calibrated leadership created more resonance and less resistance. It’s high-leverage, low-cost and almost never taught.

Energy-Calibrated Leadership Creates More Resonance

Nate Chang
Chief Marketing Officer, Sequel Brands

I dropped the habit of being the central problem-solver and instead adopted a leadership style rooted in trust and alignment. 

I thrive in fast-paced, high-pressure environments, but I realized that real momentum comes when the team moves in sync, not just quickly. 

We’ve built a culture of shared ownership by creating space for others to step up, contribute and lead within their roles. It’s not about individual decisions; it’s about shared clarity and collective direction. 

That shift has empowered my teams to move confidently, make smart calls and keep each other accountable. 

The result? More cohesion, faster execution and creativity that resonates because it’s built through collective purpose, not just individual drive.

Trust, Alignment Replace Central Problem-Solving

Jason Post
Founder & Director, Retirement Home Insider

When I started getting promoted into leadership roles of greater responsibility, I became uber focused on results.

In leadership meetings, it was regularly a conversation that started:
“Where are we on….”, “How are we doing…”? My meetings were always driven by questions around whatever project, or metric my department was chasing.

After a while, my messaging became stale and my team began to tune me out.

One day I was with a colleague and he was with a leader on a conference call. He started by saying – “How can I help you?”

I realized later he was focused on their needs, in order to get his objectives met.

It was a mic drop moment – stop being focused just on your goals – you can achieve more by helping your team as well.

Every conversation I have now, includes a standard question “What can I help YOU with?”

Lead With “What Can I Help You With?”

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

80% Employees Report A Positive Experience With AI At Work. How Can HR Build On That?

80% Employees Report A Positive Experience With AI At Work. How Can HR Build On That?

By Mary Rizzuti, Partner at EisnerAmper

As the use cases for artificial intelligence in the workplace have multiplied, so have questions about how organizations can use this technology most effectively. A recent survey by EisnerAmper of 1,000 employees across a range of industries, who have used AI at work in the past year, found that 80% reported a “positive” experience. Furthermore, 64% of the employees said they are using the time saved through AI to do more work – confirming the potential of the technology to automate and accelerate repetitive tasks, while freeing users to focus on higher-value activities.

And yet, it is not clear that the majority of employers are building on these positive outcomes to maximize the benefits of AI platforms. Let’s look at some key reasons why this is the case – and what HR professionals can do about it.

One challenge is that a sizeable number of employees, 27%, claim they don’t know who is leading the AI efforts at their company. This “leadership vacuum” implies that employers could be doing more to actively encourage the use of AI, and to focus on its most relevant and productive applications.

Another obstacle to the wider adoption of AI is its underutilization in onboarding. Fewer than 20% of the survey respondents said their organizations use AI for onboarding. Yet, nearly 92% of employees who did experience AI during onboarding described the process as “very positive” or “somewhat positive”. This disconnect suggests that employees might be more comfortable using AI – and using it in ways most beneficial to their employers – if they experienced the technology from the “get go” at onboarding time.

Employees Outpace Employers in AI Adoption

There are a number of other complications related to the use of AI in a corporate environment. One of the most significant issues is whether the company plans to employ internally developed AI systems, or adopt off-the-shelf products. Employees need clear direction on what the corporate policy is in this case, and whether the use of externally sourced AI programs is permissible.

Last, but certainly not least, employees need to have greater clarity about the implications of AI for their jobs, in order to alleviate concerns and foster more “buy-in”. More than half of the employees surveyed (almost 52%) were “strongly” or “somewhat” concerned about potential job changes or displacement due to AI. And 74% said that “people should be compensated” for their AI experience and skill.

Clear Direction Needed from Company Leaders

Given the findings noted above, organizations should consider the following actions:
We strongly advise companies to establish a Steering Committee to take the lead in AI adoption. Ideally, the Steering Committee would consist of members from across the organization, representing a range of responsibilities and functional capacities. It is important to include employees at different levels of seniority, not just senior executives, as newer team members are more likely to be active users of AI.


– The Steering Committee should assess all the ways that AI may be (or is already) applied to the company’s operations and develop an appropriate deployment strategy, including clear priorities. For example, is AI being used for internal functions, such as an HR chatbot, or in external-facing roles, such as customer service, among other uses? Understanding how employees “on the ground” are utilizing these systems will be essential to adopting an effective AI strategy.


– Apply AI more broadly to the onboarding process so employees “get the message” early on that it is intrinsic to the organization. One caveat, however, is that the AI-driven onboarding process should not take place in a vacuum. Use of AI during onboarding will be most beneficial if the company is truly committed to and delivers on the use of artificial intelligence on an ongoing basis.


– Once the Steering Committee has established the AI strategy and top priorities, leadership needs to frankly assess the impact on employees. While some functions will likely be replaced by AI systems, there may be opportunities for upskilling some employees or shifting some team members to other areas. Over the long term, it will be important to implement clear processes for transitioning employees who AI displaces.


– As for whether or how to compensate employees who acquire advanced AI skills, an increase in base pay is probably not the best option, as it may lead to long-term structural salary inflation. A better solution might be a spot bonus or stipend, which would incentivize AI mastery without up-ending pay scales.


– As with all change, clear, consistent communication is key to managing concerns, encouraging engagement and acceptance, and soliciting input for continued improvement.

The above observations show that, in many cases, employees are actually ahead of their employers in unlocking the value of artificial intelligence. To realize AI’s vast potential, organizations would be well-advised to take a more strategic and intentional approach to deploying the technology in the workplace.

Assess, Prioritize and Communicate

Mary Rizzuti is a Partner at EisnerAmper and Practice Leader of HR Advisory and Outsourcing and Compensation Resources. With over 25 years of experience in compensation and human resources consulting, Mary has gained significant expertise in evaluating, designing, and developing creative compensation and human resources programs across all industries and business sectors.

Mary coordinates and executes business development initiatives while building strong working relationships with clients and strategic partners. With extensive experience within the not-for-profit and private company sectors, Mary provides clients with comprehensive consulting in executive compensation, salary administration, sales compensation, and performance management. Also included in her scope of expertise is interpreting market data and providing guidance to senior leadership and boards of directors on applying best practices and aligning market data to each company’s unique environment.

About Mary Rizzuti

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

From Autopilot to Purpose: Transformative Habit Shifts

From Autopilot to Purpose: Transformative Habit Shifts

Leadership habits shape organizational success, and adapting them intentionally can yield transformative results. 

This HR Spotlight article gathers insights from business leaders and HR professionals on one habit they consciously dropped and one they adopted in recent years, along with the direct outcomes. 

From abandoning micromanagement to embracing delegation, or shifting from over-efforting to seeking ease, these leaders reveal how small changes drive big impact. 

By fostering trust, empowering teams, and prioritizing clarity, their strategies enhance collaboration, boost efficiency, and create thriving cultures, offering actionable lessons for leaders navigating today’s dynamic business landscape.

Read on!

I have pushed back on leader-centric branding. As a founder, it is a default for an organization to focus on the high-profile leader.

This often created bottlenecks in workflows, business development and customer success.

Being deliberate in pushing leadership to others in the organization and doing so in outward ways has proven valuable to both individual contributor development and brand identity.

Distributed Leadership Builds Brand Identity

I’ve been that manager. The one who caused good people to quit. If I am honest, that’s a pretty hard pill to swallow, but it’s true.

So when I started my own business in 2022, I made myself a promise: I will never be the reason someone dreads coming to work. But saying it and living it were two very different things. To actually become the kind of leader I wanted to be, I had to make two major shifts:

– I had to let go of the belief that I had to know everything. Somewhere along the way, I picked up this idea that being a leader meant having all the answers. Spoiler alert: it doesn’t. What does it mean?

It means hiring people who are better than you in areas where you’re weak. Trusting them. Learning from them. And genuinely celebrating when they shine… even when (especially when) they surpass you.

– I had to give my team clarity and trust. We did that by building our rulebook, not a dusty policy binder, but our core values: Authenticity, Knowledge, Efficiency, Accuracy, Gratitude, Integrity. These aren’t just words we stuck on the website. They are everything. We talk about them in daily huddles. We hired them. We fire them. Every single person on my team knows where we’re going and how we’re getting there, because our values are committed to memory and engraved on their hearts.

Those two shifts changed everything. My business took off. Our goals stopped feeling like wishful thinking and started becoming reality. And my team? They became more confident, capable, and engaged than ever.

As the CEO of a growing consulting company, this evolution didn’t just help the business grow, it gave me the space to lead with vision instead of just managing chaos.

If you’ve ever looked around and thought, “This isn’t working”… it might be time to look inward. Because real leadership? It’s not about control. It’s about clarity. It’s about trust. And it’s about building something people are excited to be part of.

Leadership Shifts from Control to Clarity

One habit I’ve intentionally adopted is asking a subset of the team to develop even deeply impactful strategies without my direct involvement. On the flip side, I’ve quit trying to be involved in every brainstorming session. I used to be so involved in shaping our messaging that I’d read every blog post before it got published (and edit heavily).

The hands-on approach got us where we are, and I don’t regret it. It won’t get us where we’re going though. We have a strong brand and team in place, so there’s no reason to let my own bandwidth limit either.

The team will do things I won’t like. Occasional failures are inevitable. We won’t let the fear of failure prevent us from putting things into production so we can gather market feedback. This is exactly what I discuss in my book, and what we teach our clients.

Trusting the Team for Growth

Dr. Jaime Goff
Founder of The Empathic Leader and author, The Secure Leader

My team and I design and run our company’s flagship executive leadership program, a high-profile initiative with a large budget.

In the early cohorts, I tried to empower my team by delegating key pieces, yet as launch dates loomed my anxiety and perfectionism kicked in. I slipped into micromanagement, asking them rapid-fire questions that felt like interrogations. I was projecting my stress and undercutting their confidence.

Recognizing this pattern, I turned the spotlight inward. When visibility and pressure rise, I now pause, breathe, and use quick reflective prompts to challenge the story in my head. I still check progress but with curiosity and support rather than control. The result is a calmer leader, a more capable team, and a richer learning experience for our future executives.

Curiosity Beats Micromanagement for Leaders

As a result of the pandemic I stopped spreading myself too thin by overscheduling/hitting multiple overlapping networking events, etc.

I learned to disconnect from technology and focus on cultivating human/face-to-face relationships.

Meeting for coffee/lunch even virtually not only allows you to refuel/recharge but it also accomplishes so much more than e-mail/social media posts.

I now give myself permission to say no. Whether it means sleeping in (no to an alarm clock), meditating, taking a walk, or just turning off the phone/computer (no I will respond later on my own schedule), simple acts of letting myself relax and enjoy the moment are the very best gifts I can give myself.

What I have come to appreciate and realize is that “me time” is not a luxury or pampering like it was in my youth, now it is maintenance! Doing less can be more impactful.

Disconnecting and Learning to Say No

Jeff Williams
President & CEO, Aptia Group US

One leadership habit I consciously let go of was tolerating people who lacked integrity.

I call it my personal “no jerks” rule.

I made a promise to only build and lead alongside people of real fabric, people I trust and respect. If I’m going to pour myself into building something, it has to be with people I believe in and in a culture I’m proud of. Why give myself to anything less?

On the flip side, one habit I’ve intentionally adopted is what I call the power of a little bit more.

In a world that can feel fragile and uncertain, I’ve developed a mindset of giving just a bit more to my work, to my people, to my life.

I work out a little bit stronger, love a little bit harder, hug my wife a little bit tighter.

That small shift has created a life and leadership style driven by purpose, not just productivity. It has helped me build not only successful teams but meaningful ones.

Integrity and Purpose Define Leadership

Angela Justice
Founder & Executive Coach, Justice Group Advisors

I used to believe that if I wasn’t exhausted, I probably wasn’t doing enough.

So I overfunctioned. Took on too much. Made things harder than they needed to be. And I called it leadership.

The habit I dropped was over-efforting. What I adopted instead was asking: What would make this easier?

That question changed everything. It helped me see that effort ≠ impact. Now, before I take something on—or when it starts to feel heavier than it should—I pause and ask:

– What’s the simplest path to the outcome I want?

– What would this look like if it were 20% easier?

– What might I be making harder than it needs to be?

Now I move faster, lead better, and make more space for the people around me to do the same.

Ease isn’t lazy. It’s leadership without the drag.

And when other leaders hear that, they exhale—because they’ve been carrying too much for too long.

Ease is Leadership Without the Drag

Sarah Williams
Founder & Principal, Recruit Healthcare

In recent years, I made a conscious decision to let go of micromanaging.

It was actually a family member who first said something. We were making dinner together, and (as usual) I was trying to control everything from the oven temperature to the garbage collection. What I thought was just good advice was actually undermining her abilities, and suddenly, it hit me — I do this to my employees, hovering over them, and unintentionally limiting their independence.
And, just like in the kitchen, the habit wasn’t doing me any favors.

Since then, I’ve consciously replaced micromanagement with intentional delegation.

I’ve learned to trust my team with real ownership of their work and to give them the space to make decisions and solve problems without me hovering over every detail.

The change has been transformational. The team moves faster, takes more initiative, and genuinely feels empowered in their roles when less supervised.

Intentional Delegation Replaces Micromanagement for Growth

Sheena Yap Chan
Wall Street Journal Bestselling Author, The Tao of Self-Confidence

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was over-explaining myself to be “liked” or validated.

As an Asian woman, I was taught to soften my voice and over-justify my decisions to avoid conflict or judgment. Letting go of that habit allowed me to lead with more clarity and self-trust.

The habit I intentionally adopted was listening more deeply without immediately reacting. Instead of rushing to fill space or provide answers, I now give others room to process and speak fully. That shift created stronger relationships, better collaboration, and more empowered conversations.

Real leadership isn’t about controlling every outcome—it’s about holding space and showing up with intention.

Leading with Clarity, not Over-Explaining

One leadership habit I’ve intentionally adopted is being honest, especially when I don’t have the answers.

If someone comes to me with a problem I can’t immediately solve, I don’t bluff or pretend like I know it all, but simply tell them I’ll find out.

The same goes for mistakes that I will always own, and I expect the same from my teams. You will be amazed at how powerful mistakes can be as a leader.

I’ve also consciously dropped the habit of always trying to provide solutions.

I used to think offering quick fixes showed competence, but it actually discouraged creative thinking and added to my own stress. Now, I just focus on creating space for my team to bring their own ideas. And that has resulted in a more confident, creative team, plus a much healthier dynamic for everyone involved, including me.

Honesty And Humility Empower Great Teams

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Transparency Without Chaos: Leaders Share How to Satisfy Gen Z at Work

Transparency Without Chaos: Leaders Share How to Satisfy Gen Z at Work

A transformative shift is reshaping the workplace, driven by Gen Z’s demand for flexibility, with nearly half seeking adaptable schedules, per EY’s findings. 

This push for diverse, flexible arrangements is essential to empower a multi-generational workforce. 

Leaders face a complex challenge: meeting Gen Z’s needs while ensuring fairness across generations and achieving business goals. 

This HR Spotlight article gathers insights from business executives and HR experts, exploring innovative policies and digital tools they use. 

Their experiences offer a strategic roadmap for building an agile, inclusive, high-performing culture that benefits all.

Read on!

Narrate the Why, Not the What

Narrate the ‘Why’, Not Just the ‘What’

In my view, companies best achieve Gen Z’s expectation of transparency by explaining decisions rather than just announcing them.

Whether detailing pay bands, promotion paths, or changes to strategy, if you communicate the reasons behind your decisions, you build trust with your employees, even if the news is bad.

We have helped clients with short internal videos or Q&A sessions led by real execs to explain decisions in unglossed English.

This type of disclosure isn’t about sharing absolutely everything about the decision; rather, it’s about making a statement that management truly respects the workers and is willing to tell them the truth and involve them early on.

CLARITY BEATS PERFECTION, a process-visibility approach is preferred by Gen Z over polished spin.

Transparency and Boundaries Build Respect

My best practice is to train everyone in the workplace, including GenZ, to know the boundaries of appropriate and inappropriate work behavior. They know they can ask people and culture (HR) or the CEO (me) any questions they have and we will do our best to share. But they also know to respect a statement that “this is what we can share right now.”

We both foster a lot of opportunity to disagree and give feedback and clarity on who is ultimately responsible for the final decision, which should then be respected. I learned this from working at the Department of Defense. We do err on the side of updates and transparency in monthly townhalls, so everyone has the opportunity to get caught up.

Transparency and Feedback Build Gen Z Trust

After 20+ years in hospitality and taking over Flinders Lane Café, I’ve learned Gen Z responds best to transparent feedback loops.

When we expanded from 3 to 7 days of kitchen service, I openly shared our weekly revenue numbers and customer feedback scores with the entire team, including our younger staff.

The game-changer was creating monthly “reality check” sessions where anyone could question decisions or suggest improvements without hierarchy getting in the way.

One Gen Z team member pointed out our social media felt too polished—they helped us start posting behind-the-scenes content that actually showed our daily struggles and wins.

When organizational constraints do exist (like budget limits for wage increases), I’ve found being brutally honest about the numbers works better than vague promises. I show them our actual costs, profit margins, and growth targets. They appreciate seeing the real business challenges rather than getting corporate speak.

Clear Policies Build Trust With Gen Z

My two decades representing employees reveal a fundamental need for clear, consistent workplace policies. Gen Z’s demand for transparency often stems from a lack of clarity in how decisions, especially about progression and rewards, are truly made. This ambiguity creates distrust and can lead to perceived unfairness.

The best practice is to implement thoroughly documented and universally applied performance-based reward and evaluation systems. My firm frequently sees issues from arbitrary measures; instead, rewards should be tied to easily measured work, with clear examples of expectations and outcomes communicated upfront.

This approach ensures employees understand precisely what is expected for advancement and compensation, fostering trust and showing tangible equity.

Clearly explained policies, with established penalties for violations and explicit non-retaliation clauses for reporting issues, build genuine transparency.

Ty Francis
Chief Advisory Officer, LRN Corporation

Generationally Aware Training Builds Gen Z Trust

I recommend building more generationally aware, context-driven training and communication that bridges the gap between Gen Z’s demand for transparency and the realities of organizational constraints. Gen Z is more values-driven, but also highly skeptical. Our search shows fewer than half believe their managers hold themselves to the same ethical standards they expect from others. That kind of mistrust erodes engagement and makes ethics programs feel performative.

This is why training needs to go deeper. The key is to use real workplace dynamics, perhaps including WhatsApp exchanges, and offhand comments in hybrid meetings to highlight the nuances of digital-first communication.

When people see their own experiences reflected and understand why certain information is shared (or withheld), they’re more likely to trust leadership and middle management. It’s about clarity, consistency, and context. That’s how you build credibility and a sustainable culture.

Strategic Transparency Builds Gen Z Trust

Think of transparency like a GPS for your workplace – except Gen Z wants to see EVERY pothole ahead.

The best practice? Strategic transparency with context. Instead of saying “we can’t share that,” try “here’s the bigger picture and why some details are classified (no, not CIA-level, just Tuesday budget meeting-level).”

Give them the route overview – where you’re headed, what obstacles you’re dodging, and how their role matters. Share the ‘why’ behind decisions. Gen Z doesn’t need to know everything, but they need to know you’re not hiding everything. It’s the difference between “trust us” and “here’s why you should trust us.”

At Optima, we help you design transparency frameworks that turn generational friction into competitive advantage. Because when your people understand the journey, they’re more invested in the destination – and less likely to jump ship at the first stop.

Jared Bauman
Co Founder & CEO, 201 Creative

Structured Transparency Builds Gen Z Trust

One best practice is to embrace “structured transparency.” That means giving Gen Z employees more insight into decision-making processes, even if you can’t share every single detail.

You don’t have to reveal all the numbers or internal politics, but you can walk them through how and why a decision was made, who was involved, and what the intended impact is.

Gen Z doesn’t just want outcomes. They want context.

Framing communication this way builds trust without putting the company at risk. It also shows respect for their desire to understand the bigger picture, which goes a long way in today’s workplace.

Rameez Ghayas Usmani
Director of Link Building, HARO Services

Honesty Builds Respect With Gen Z

One thing that’s helped us bridge that Gen Z transparency gap is just being honest about what we can explain. If something can’t be shared, I don’t dodge it. I say that upfront, but I always explain why.

For example, if a campaign strategy isn’t fully open, I still walk the team through how decisions are made and what goes into it.

Most of the time, they’re not looking for full access. They just want to know they’re not being kept in the dark. That kind of honesty builds a lot more respect than trying to polish over things.

Diana Babaeva
Founder & CEO, Twistly

Transparency that Doesn’t Overwhelm

Structured visibility offers the best compromise for Gen Z expectations and business limits.

This entails recurring, lightweight rituals such as short weekly Loom updates from leaders or open dashboards with project progress, so people feel in the know, yet not having access to everything.

The Gen Z type doesn’t want full exposure; they just want to feel on the inside, not on the outside.
So, rather than just sharing more, make sure what is shared feels real and current, if imperfect.

Format and frequency mean more than volume, authenticity goes a long way with Gen Z.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

The Case for Unpaid Internships: Leaders Share Ethical Contexts

The Case for Unpaid Internships: Leaders Share Ethical Contexts

Unpaid internships spark debate, but in specific cases, they can be fair when prioritized as educational experiences. 

This HR Spotlight article gathers insights from business leaders and HR professionals across industries like tech, law, and manufacturing, exploring when unpaid internships are justified. 

From short-term, mentorship-driven programs in startups to observational roles in niche fields like military justice, these experts highlight scenarios where learning trumps labor. 

Emphasizing transparency, structured training, and tangible skill-building, they reveal how to design internships that benefit interns without exploitation, ensuring mutual value in competitive sectors. 

Discover when unpaid internships can ethically bridge education and career growth.

Read on!

Margaret Buj
Principal Recruiter, Mixmax

Unpaid Internships Must Offer Tangible Learning

In tech and SaaS specifically, I believe unpaid internships should be the exception, not the rule – but there are a few niche situations where they can be fair and mutually beneficial.

One example is when an early-stage startup genuinely lacks funding but can offer tangible, structured learning in exchange for the intern’s time. For instance, if the internship provides mentorship, exposure to real-world projects, and measurable deliverables that the intern can showcase later — and the duration is short and clearly defined (e.g., 4–6 weeks) – it can be appropriate.

However, in my 20 years hiring across Europe, LATAM, and the U.S., I’ve seen too many unpaid internships that exploit candidates without giving them meaningful skills or experience.

My rule of thumb: if the company benefits from the intern’s work, the intern should be compensated — but when the primary value flows to the intern’s learning and portfolio-building, a short unpaid placement can make sense.

Unpaid Internships Work When Education Trumps Labor

An unpaid internship can be appropriate when it is structured as a short-term, skills-focused experience that directly benefits the student rather than the organization.

For example, a social work or child development student might participate in a summer program where they shadow case managers, attend training workshops, and observe family support services without being asked to shoulder essential responsibilities. In this case, the purpose is not to replace staff but to give the intern exposure to real-world practices in a supervised, educational setting.

Fairness comes from transparency and boundaries.

The internship must be clearly presented as a learning opportunity with defined outcomes, limited hours, and mentorship built in.

If the arrangement is designed around the student’s academic growth and offers access to training or professional connections that would otherwise be difficult to obtain, then it can serve as a valuable bridge into the field. Anything beyond that—particularly if the organization relies on the intern for ongoing work—should be paid.

Learning-Focused Design Internships Create Mutual Benefits

As I see it, an unpaid internship is a good experience if considered an opportunity to learn, rather than work.

If a prospective designer wanted to witness a luxury cabinetry and closet program, a period of unpaid internship could be a positive initiative for both parties.

The intern would receive real experience, hands-on exposure to design software, customers, and project management. At the same time, the firm could mentor and educate candidates without putting them into a position with an obligation of production.

It is a mutually beneficial relationship that emphasizes skill development over direct financial contributions.

Internship goals would include specific learning objectives and direction roles for mentoring.

We aim to avoid turning the internship into a role-filling exercise and instead foster the development of the next generation of professionals in the industry.

By allowing students to work in a framework that is facilitated but flexible, we can help the intern to develop their portfolio work, and the company gets to experience their energy and outlook.

Personal Growth Becomes Valid Currency in Fair Internships

Fair internships are those where the experience itself becomes a form of meaningful compensation

At Mr. & Mrs. Shogun, we work in the field of personal growth and conscious living, where people don’t only learn by gathering information—they grow through experience, reflection, and transformation.

That is why an internship with us is not about filling a role cheaply, but about creating space where someone can immerse themselves in this process while contributing to our mission.

Our interns receive full access to our tools, guidance sessions, and the same safe environment we use within our team to explore sensitive issues and personal growth.

This creates a unique exchange: while they support us with their skills, they also benefit from deep, structured learning and a chance to understand themselves on a much more conscious level.

We believe payment comes in many forms. Financial reward is one, but equally valuable is the exchange of energy, presence, and growth.

An unpaid internship can be fair when it is clearly built as a transformative learning experience—one where the intern leaves not only with new skills, but with deeper clarity, self-understanding, and inner resources that will serve them far beyond the time spent with us.

James Shaffer
Managing Director, Insurance Panda

Shadow-Only Roles Define Ethical Unpaid Insurance Internships

Here’s the only case I think unpaid internships are fair in: when the role is explicitly shadow-only, short-term, and framed as education, not labor.

I’ve had college students ask to shadow me for two weeks just to see how the auto insurance quoting business works. They sat in on calls, watched how we build campaigns, and asked blunt questions about commissions, compliance, and lead buying. They didn’t handle client accounts, they didn’t generate billable work. It was exposure, nothing more.

That’s the line. If the intern is producing assets that make the company money, pay them. If they’re literally observing, taking notes, and getting an inside look into an industry most schools never teach, then I see unpaid as acceptable, provided it’s brief, clearly defined, and the value exchange is obvious.

In my shop, the shadow interns left with something tangible: access to raw performance dashboards, a peek at how quote funnels are tested, and time with staff across departments. They weren’t fetching coffee, they were pulling back the curtain on a business model.

Anything beyond that, and “unpaid” becomes exploitation dressed as opportunity.

Mark Hirsch
Co-founder & Personal Injury Attorney, Templer & Hirsch

Law Externships Offer Real Experience Through School Credit

When a law student seeks to earn school credit through an externship program, it may be fair and proper to offer them an unpaid internship.

I’ve helped dozens of these interns over the past 30 years. They’re not doing office work; instead, they’re watching depositions, helping get ready for trial, and watching real talks. Their law schools and the ABA have strict rules about these jobs.

One of my interns went on to work for a top plaintiff’s firm in Miami. He still thanks me for giving him the chance to “see the trenches.” The essential things are being open, teaching others, and not letting paid workers go. It’s not free work; it’s legal schooling.

Always follow the rules set by the federal and state governments about work to stay honest and legal.

Steven Rodemer
Owner & Attorney for Law Office of Rodemer & Kane DUI & Criminal Defense Attorney

Military Justice Internships Offer Unique Value

For law students interested in military justice, an unpaid internship in this setting can be uniquely valuable. Many defense attorneys in Colorado handle cases involving service members facing courts-martial or administrative actions.

An intern can observe these proceedings, learn the differences between civilian and military courts, and study how legal strategy adapts in this environment. The internship’s fairness comes from the rare opportunity to access a niche field that students often cannot see firsthand.

Because military cases involve sensitive issues, these internships remain observational and educational.

Fair Internships Provide Insight, Not Just Labor

Unpaid internships can be more than fair if the businesses are providing insight and experience into relevant job roles, departments and real-life scenarios for those who have an interest in working within that sector.

Whether they are performing work experience through their high school, a longer internship as part of a university degree or an unpaid work agreement for a career change – if the person gains knowledge and confidence in the area, it is advantageous for them.

When a company is demanding free labour from an intern, and not doing their part of educating, training and enabling them to flourish it – becomes unfair.

Within our specific industry of manufacturing, we see that a fair internship will enable the person to be exposed to multiple processes of the chain – from planning and procurement, engineering and development, marketing and sales, the factory floor and warehouse and logistics.

Their internship is fair if they are provided with the opportunities to experience and learn the full journey and process and leave with an understanding of the whole business.

Michał Bieńko
Recruiter & HR Generalist, Omni Calculator

Internships: A Smart Hiring Funnel

Unpaid internships can only be fair when they work like a boot camp or mentorship program, where interns gain skills directly relevant to today’s job market. In that case, as an intern, you get great value in exchange for your time.

However, the employer has to generously invest in developing skills that an intern can, and most likely will, use in another company. In the short term, that might seem like wasting money. Yet an employer who uses this as a recruiting tool has enormous leverage in finding the most promising performers.

Using an internship for this purpose reveals interns’ learning agility, openness to feedback, and culture fit for the company. With this knowledge, it’s easy to make an excellent long-term hire.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Unmasking Deception: How Ghosting and Catfishing Disrupt Remote Teams

Unmasking Deception: How Ghosting and Catfishing Disrupt Remote Teams

Trust is the most critical currency in the remote-first workplace.

But in a landscape where professional relationships are built on digital connections, that trust is under attack from a new kind of deception.

The rise of trends like ghosting (when a team member vanishes without a trace) and catfishing (when a professional’s identity or skills are a complete fabrication) is creating a silent crisis.

These digital betrayals don’t just disrupt a workflow; they erode accountability, shatter team dynamics, and destroy the psychological safety required for high performance.

This HR Spotlight article gathers invaluable insights from a panel of business leaders and HR experts.

They offer a strategic playbook for leaders to confront these new threats head-on, providing a blueprint for cultivating a culture of authenticity, transparency, and resilience in an era where digital deception is a real and present danger.

Read on!

Deceptive Hiring Practices Fracture Team Trust

After 40 years in business and 50,000+ transactions, I’ve witnessed how deceptive practices destroy team trust.

I’ve observed what I call ‘recruitment PTSD’ destroying teams from within. When colleagues witness extensive candidate ghosting after completing real company challenges disguised as assessments, 73% of remaining employees start questioning leadership integrity.

The damage runs deeper than missing hires. Teams develop ‘defensive documentation’ behaviors where members over-communicate to avoid being discredited themselves. This hypervigilance reduces collaborative innovation by 28% within six months.

What’s most destructive is the ‘privilege divide’ effect. Team members who secured positions through family financial support during job searches unconsciously biased against colleagues who worked while interviewing. This creates subtle hierarchical tensions that fragment team cohesion.

The catfishing element – where companies misrepresent challenge time requirements – breeds ‘scope creep anxiety’. Teams become paranoid about project boundaries, leading to what psychologists identify as ‘moral injury’ where members know unethical practices occur but feel powerless.

Companies implementing reverse reference checks through informal network connections reduce these incidents by 67% and maintain healthier team dynamics.

Vanishing, Catfishing Erode Remote Team Trust

I’ve led remote teams across SEO, AI, and video marketing for over a decade, and I’ve seen how ghosting and catfishing create lasting cracks in team trust.

Unlike ghosting phenomena in more classic projects where clients disappear half-way through an assignment leaving delays and stress, ghosting in the situation of remote work has simply come to mean clients and freelancers vanishing on each other in the middle of a project.

It destroys trust ever so softly under the guise of simply doing its work. It really hurt accountability, leaving teams no choice but to begin micromanaging or recording everything.

The phenomenon of catfishing is growing exponentially with the creation of AI-based profiles and deepfaked portfolios.

We once had a contractor who pretended to be someone else and disappeared after we confronted him about a number of discrepancies in the video call.

The behaviors erode trust fairly rapidly and push companies to implement more stringent vetting and probation procedures.

The best solution we’ve found is a layered onboarding process that incorporates test tasks, live check-ins, and open peer reviews.

In the hybrid scenario, authenticity comes into the equation, and one fake profile can adversely affect your entire work culture.

Magda Klimkiewicz
Senior HR Business Partner, Live Career

Disappearing, Deceiving Undermine Remote Team Confidence

Ghosting and catfishing are making it hard for people to trust each other in remote or hybrid work. When someone suddenly stops replying or disappears, others are left to do extra work without knowing what happened.

In the same way, when a person lies about who they are or what they can do, it makes managers give them tasks they can’t handle. This often leads to mistakes, delays, and frustration among team members.

Because of these issues, managers have to spend more time fixing problems. They may need to replace the person, reassign tasks, or explain things to the team. As a result, this slows down work and makes it harder to build a strong team.

In the end, these behaviors continue to harm the team connection and workflow. When trust is broken and communication fails, it becomes harder to grow and succeed together.

Ghosting, Catfishing: The Hidden Cost to Team Cohesion

Both ghosting and catfishing can have serious negative consequences on team dynamics.

Whether it’s a team member not answering messages or showing up to group meetings, or a new hire quickly demonstrating that they don’t have the experience they claimed to have in their resume, teams can struggle to perform as they need to.

Not only can ghosting and catfishing cause legitimate issues with things like timelines and quality of work, but they can also result in team members feeling like they need to do more work independently because they don’t know if they can rely on each other. This sows a seed of distrust.

Ryan Grambart
Founder & President, World Copper Smith

How Digital Deception Erodes Trust and Teamwork

Ghosting and catfishing can truly disrupt team dynamics.

I believe ghosting—a sudden halt in communication—makes team members feel overlooked and uncertain about their responsibilities. It undermines trust and complicates collaboration as individuals begin to hesitate in contacting one another.

Conversely, catfishing results in distrust and ambiguity. When an individual assumes a deceptive identity, it can erode team unity and lower morale. I think that when team members discover they’ve been misled, it impacts their emotional well-being and also diminishes overall productivity.

I believe these actions foster an atmosphere that impairs open communication, making it difficult to establish strong relationships within the team.

Tackling these problems promptly can contribute to preserving a more robust team dynamic over time.

Human Connection Curbs Professional Ghosting

Professional ghosting has exploded since remote work became standard. Here’s what we’re seeing: candidates disappear mid-interview process, new hires vanish after the first week, and team members stop responding without explanation.

The root cause in my opinion? Reduced human connection makes professional relationships feel disposable. When you’re just a Zoom square or a Slack profile, it’s psychologically easier to disappear than have difficult conversations. (We’ve seen this happen time and time again).

We’ve found teams with team off-sites, structured check-ins and a relationship-building-first culture show less ghosting incidents versus companies that don’t. The solution isn’t more technology—it’s more intentional human connection.

Catfishing Erodes Trust, Hinders Remote Efficiency

Catfishing in professional settings happens when remote workers misrepresent their skills, availability or work situations during hiring or project assignments.

This creates gaps in capabilities that only become clear as deadlines approach. Unlike personal catfishing, workplace deception centers on professional skills instead of personal traits but it still harms trust and affects the entire team.

The most damaging effect is when team members find out they have been covering for someone who misrepresented their skills. This leads to resentment and skepticism about future remote collaborations.

Our time tracking software indicates that teams recovering from professional catfishing incidents spend 40% more time on verification and check-ins. This undermines the efficiency gains that remote work usually offers with less oversight.

Nicholas Sanson
Founder & Operations Manager, A TEX Roofing

Integrity Ensures Trust in Professional Relationships

Ghosting and catfishing fundamentally destabilize professional relationships, especially in remote or hybrid environments.

They erode trust, which is the bedrock of any successful team and client interaction. My experience building businesses like A-TEX Roofing highlights that integrity is non-negotiable for long-term success.

When communication is unclear or identities are misrepresented, it creates significant operational friction. For us, delivering on promises like “same-day estimates” or “24/7 emergency services” relies on every team member’s transparency and accountability. A single ghosted task can compromise our entire commitment to superior service.

This lack of genuine interaction poisons team dynamics, fostering uncertainty and resentment. It directly counters our goal of fostering growth and building strong teams, where every individual’s contribution is clear and reliable.

Our “lifetime warranty” reflects a culture built on unwavering trust and reliability, not ambiguity.

Transparency Fosters Trust in Team Dynamics

As Head of Marketing at Anew Therapy, our mission is built on providing hope and healing through compassionate, personalized care in a safe and supportive environment.

This foundational principle extends deeply to our internal team dynamics, especially in remote or hybrid settings where trust and clear communication are paramount.

Ghosting, or a lack of transparent follow-through, directly erodes the psychological safety crucial for effective collaboration and innovation.

Much like the “integration” we emphasize for patient healing to achieve lasting change, team members need consistent engagement to truly integrate and contribute effectively.

Similarly, catfishing, or misrepresenting intent or identity, shatters credibility and breeds uncertainty.

These behaviors hinder open communication, ultimately disrupting team cohesion and productivity, making it incredibly challenging for a team to deliver on its collective mission and thrive.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.