workforce

When Good Intentions Backfire

April 15, 2026 by HRSAdmin

April 15, 2026

When Good Intentions Backfire

Why DEI Efforts Get Misclassified and Misunderstood

By Megan Fuciarelli, Chief Empowerment Officer at US² Consulting

Most organizations don’t set out to get DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) wrong.

In fact, the intent is usually the opposite. Leaders want to build inclusive environments, support diverse talent, and create cultures where people feel seen and valued. But despite those intentions, many organizations are finding themselves facing internal confusion, external scrutiny, or initiatives that no longer land the way they were intended.

The issue isn’t DEI.

It’s how organizations oversimplify it.

When complex, nuanced work gets reduced to vague labels, it creates space for misinterpretation, misclassification, and ultimately, decisions that don’t reflect what’s actually happening inside the organization.

One of the biggest challenges I see is a lack of precision.

Organizations use broad terms like “equity,” “inclusion,” or “belonging,” but often without clearly defining what those mean in practice. That leaves room for interpretation at every level.

Internally, this leads to inconsistency. Externally, it can lead to misunderstanding or misrepresentation, especially when decisions are made based on surface-level descriptions rather than actual outcomes.

When definitions aren’t clear, everything becomes easier to mislabel.

In an effort to move quickly, many organizations fall into what I call “checkbox categorization.”

Programs get grouped and labeled in simplified ways that make them easier to track, but harder to understand. A mentorship program becomes a “DEI initiative.” A leadership pipeline effort gets categorized under diversity. A community partnership gets reduced to a single label that doesn’t reflect its purpose.

These shortcuts create a false sense of clarity.

Once something is labeled, it’s rarely questioned. That label becomes the reference point for decisions, reporting, and perception, even if it’s not accurate. Over time, this creates a disconnect between what an organization is doing and how that work is understood.

This is where bias comes in, often quietly.

Implicit bias, or what I call our “first thoughts,” operates in the background. It’s shaped by our experiences and influences how we interpret information, especially when we’re moving quickly.

In organizational decision-making, this shows up in a few key ways:

Stereotype bias influences how we associate certain initiatives with specific groups
Confirmation bias reinforces what we already believe about DEI efforts
Anchoring bias causes us to rely too heavily on the first label applied
Affinity bias shapes which initiatives we support or prioritize

Under pressure, these biases become even more influential. Leaders rely on mental shortcuts, and classification becomes less about accuracy and more about speed.

That’s when misclassification happens, not because of intent, but because of how decisions are made.

What starts as a labeling issue quickly becomes a business issue.

Decisions get made based on incomplete or inaccurate information. Programs are evaluated against criteria they were never designed for. Leaders question the value of work that was misunderstood from the start.

Over time, this leads to misalignment, eroded trust, and reputational risk.

Because it’s not just about the label, it’s about the decisions that follow it.

This is fixable, but it requires more discipline in how decisions are made.

Start here:

Define initiatives clearly before labeling them
Tie programs to measurable business outcomes
Audit internal language and assumptions regularly
Challenge initial classifications instead of defaulting to them

Small shifts in how work is defined and evaluated can prevent much larger issues down the line.

The goal isn’t to step away from DEI.

It’s to approach it with more clarity, more precision, and a deeper awareness of how decisions are actually being made.

Because when we take the time to question our first thoughts and define our work more intentionally, we create space for better decisions.

And better decisions are what drive meaningful, lasting impact.

About the Author

Megan Fuciarelli is a speaker, author, and trusted advisor recognized for her work in ethical leadership, organizational effectiveness, and sustainable impact. She brings a human-centered, systems-aware approach to helping leaders and institutions navigate complexity with clarity, accountability, and purpose.

As the Founder & CEO (Chief Empowerment Officer) of US² Consulting, Megan partners with organizations to strengthen trust, communication, and culture while supporting long-term performance and responsible decision-making. She is known for helping leaders move beyond performative values toward aligned action that serves both people and outcomes.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions

Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

How AI-Powered Health Signals Are Changing HR Strategy

April 15, 2026 by HRSAdmin

April 15, 2026

How AI-Powered Health Signals Are Changing HR Strategy

By Erik Jivmark, CEO, Sleep Cycle

For years, workplace wellness programs have operated on a familiar cycle: people get sick, productivity drops, teammates scramble to adjust priorities, and everyone waits for the wave to pass. But what if these disruptions weren’t inevitable? What if organizations could see health challenges, like respiratory illness outbreaks coming and respond before they become inconveniences?

Here’s the uncomfortable truth: if your health strategy only kicks in when someone calls out sick, you don’t really have a strategy. You have a reaction. And there’s a significant difference.

But a shift is happening. AI-powered health signals are now moving workplace wellbeing from reactive to predictive, and the implications reach far beyond reducing sick days.

Traditional wellness programs rely on lagging indicators. By the time sick day requests appear, the opportunity for prevention has passed.

AI changes this by identifying patterns that emerge before disruption becomes unavoidable. Sleep quality shifts. Respiratory disturbances increase. Fatigue accumulates. These aren’t abstract metrics. They’re advance warnings, often surfacing days or weeks before people recognize something is wrong.

Take respiratory illness outbreaks, for example. Tools that measure coughing patterns during sleep and forecast when illness surges will occur in specific regions. Forward-thinking employers are now making these insights available to their entire workforce through bulk employee subscriptions, giving teams early warning capabilities that weren’t possible even a few years ago. When employees have access to this intelligence, they can make informed decisions about working remotely or adjusting schedules before symptoms disrupt operations.

This shifts wellness from damage control to strategic planning. HR teams can adjust staffing proactively, enable remote work when risk rises, and support employees in protecting their health and their colleagues’. The result is fewer unexpected absences and sustained productivity through seasons that used to mean inevitable disruption.

The power of predictive health signals also creates risk. When personal health data enters the workplace, employees become vulnerable to surveillance or discrimination. This is where most AI wellness initiatives fail, prioritizing organizational insight over individual privacy.

The alternative is designing systems where privacy is structural. Data should be anonymized and aggregated by default. Individual health signals never reach employers. Employees receive personalized insights that help them make better decisions, while organizations receive only the high-level trends needed to plan responsibly. If an employee starts to feel observed instead of supported, the system fails, regardless of how accurate the data is. Privacy is key.

For example, HR might learn that cough-disrupted sleep is increasing across the organization, signaling a possible respiratory illness wave, without ever knowing which employees are affected. That’s enough to adjust remote work policies or postpone large in-person meetings, all without compromising anyone’s privacy.

When prediction respects privacy, employees gain agency. When it doesn’t, they lose trust.

AI excels at pattern recognition at scale, spotting trends that would be impossible for humans to detect manually. Organizations are increasingly providing employees with access to sleep tracking and health monitoring tools through comprehensive wellness programs, generating the data that makes this pattern recognition possible. But it cannot diagnose illness, prescribe treatment, or understand individual circumstances. Those decisions still require medical professionals and employees themselves.

The value isn’t in replacing human judgment but in surfacing information that enables better decisions earlier. When HR teams provide these capabilities organization-wide, employees gain access to personalized insights about their sleep quality and health trends. For example, an employee seeing steady sleep quality decline might adjust their workload. A manager noticing aggregated sickness trends might extend a deadline before burnout becomes crisis. When AI positions itself as a decision-maker, it invites resistance. When it supports human decision-making, it earns adoption.

As predictive health signals become accessible, business strategy must evolve beyond cost containment. The question isn’t just “how do we reduce healthcare spending?” It’s “how do we build workforce resilience that sustains performance through disruption?”

Organizations that integrate predictive health intelligence gain measurable advantages. They can model staffing around predictable patterns rather than reacting to absences. They can design flexible policies that activate when aggregated risk signals rise. They can offer workload adjustments based on fatigue trends rather than waiting until burnout forces extended leave.

The shift from reactive wellness to predictive resilience represents a fundamental change in how companies think about workforce health, not as an HR benefit to manage but as a business capability to cultivate.

In 2026, employees will increasingly expect proactive health support. The organizations that succeed will approach this shift with clear principles: respecting privacy by design, empowering employees rather than surveilling them, and using AI to support human decision-making.

For HR leaders evaluating these technologies, the critical questions aren’t about capabilities but about design. Does this tool protect privacy by default? Does it empower employees or expose them? The answers will determine whether AI-powered wellness becomes a strategic advantage or just another program people avoid.

The predictive turn in workplace wellbeing is already underway. The question now is how responsibly organizations will make that turn.

About the Author

Erik Jivmark, CEO at Sleep Cycle, holds an M.Sc. in Business and Economics and brings substantial leadership experience in digital products and services, notably as the former co-founder and CEO of Volvo Car Mobility AB. With a global vision, he sees Sleep Cycle as a pivotal player in improving global health through enhanced sleep. Looking ahead, he is committed to utilizing Sleep Cycle’s leading technology and AI capabilities to advance the company as a key contributor to global well-being.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions

Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

Thawing the Cold Work Freeze

April 14, 2026 by HRSAdmin

April 14, 2026

Thawing the Cold Work Freeze

Reconnecting People, Business, and Technology Through Intelligent Experiences

By Matthew Dietly

Cold Work isn’t loud; it’s a silent standoff with real consequences for trust and performance. Our research shows 62% of employees and 49% of employers engage in hidden behaviors that secretly punish the other side: stress-scrolling, ghosting messages or withholding effort on one end; surveillance, petty assignments and micromanagement on the other. The emotional toll is real: 62% report crying, losing sleep or struggling with mental health due to work. And so is the business impact: 78% say engagement is stagnant or declining.

Thawing it requires rebuilding the connective tissue of work — the relationships, rituals, routines and resources that shape how people show up each day. Intelligent, human-centered employee experiences can accelerate that reconnection, and they’re most powerful when paired with cultural habits that strengthen trust and reduce friction across the organization.

Our Cold Work Research uncovered 6 key tensions between employees and employers:

Flexibility vs. Accountability – Employees seek autonomy while employers feel increasing pressure for output, creating a tug of war between freedom and control.
Lack of Recognition & Meaning – Employees want to feel seen and valued, but many feel invisible in systems that reward efficiency over humanity.
Normalization of Turnover – Long-term loyalty has faded, replaced by a more transactional mindset where turnover feels inevitable — on both sides.
Unrepaired Conflicts – Workplace conflict is inevitable, but repair is optional — and when conflict or tension goes unaddressed, negativity builds and impacts workplace culture.
Generational Divides – Differences in communication style, expectations, and values quietly shape how teams work together… or don’t.
Obstacles to Innovation – Employees want to learn and grow, but limited development opportunities and inconsistent tech rollouts slow meaningful innovation.

These tensions reveal a deeper pattern of disconnection between employees, their colleagues, the business, and the technology meant to support them.

Across organizations, the effects are strikingly similar: relationships strain, clarity fades, and everyday work becomes harder than it should be. When these disconnections compound, work shifts from relational to transactional — and culture freezes at the edges.

To thaw Cold Work, organizations must focus on reconnection — and a powerful way to do so is through Intelligent Employee Experiences.

Most digital transformations generate more transactions: more screens, more steps, more logins (and more frustration). Intelligent Employee Experience produces connection.

To rebuild connection and reduce friction, organizations need four foundational capabilities. These are the operating disciplines that make Intelligent EX possible, regardless of which tools or platforms you use.

Consumer-Grade Experiences

Employees expect the same ease and clarity at work that they experience as consumers. This means designing tools and workflows that feel intuitive, reduce friction, and make common tasks (like finding information, requesting support, or completing a process) simple and seamless.

AI That Amplifies Human Work

AI should play a supportive, contextual role that helps employees focus, decide, and act with confidence. Micro-interactions like summarization, routing, knowledge suggestions, and sentiment-based nudges reduce cognitive load and improve clarity. The goal is not automation for its own sake, but human amplification.

Technology Orchestration for Human Outcomes

Instead of adding more systems, Intelligent EX connects the ones you already have. Orchestration creates seamless workflows across platforms, so employees experience work as a coherent journey rather than a series of disconnected systems.

Measurement That Focuses on Value, Not Volume

Traditional measurement tracks activity; Intelligent EX tracks outcomes. Experience Level Agreements (XLAs) measure friction, clarity, trust, and capability. This shifts measurement from policing tasks to improving moments — ensuring every investment strengthens experience and performance.

One of the most practical ways to deliver Intelligent EX is through a single-pane-of-glass employee interface — a unified digital workspace where employees can find, do, learn, and connect without jumping across fragmented tools. Think of it as the organization’s daily operating system: the place employees start, navigate, and complete their work.

A world-class single interface is built on six core attributes:

Unified: A unified interface brings people, tools, tasks, knowledge, and policies into one place, with systems integrated behind the scenes so everything feels connected. No system hopping or confusion, just a single reliable starting point.
Intuitive: The experience feels obvious. Clear navigation, simple flows, and human-centered design choices reduce cognitive load and make work easy with minimal training. The interface helps employees focus, rather than forcing them to learn another system.
Intelligent: The interface anticipates needs and provides help in context. AI surfaces relevant information, suggests next steps, understands intent, and adapts workflows — helping people do their best work without adding effort or complexity.
Empowering: The interface enables employees to act independently by removing blockers that slow them down (like scattered information, unclear next steps, and tool friction). Clear visibility and timely guidance help work move forward without delays.
Ubiquitous: A ubiquitous interface provides consistent functionality and data across devices, environments, and roles — from corporate offices to frontline environments to mobile — ensuring the experience travels with the employee.
Inclusive: A great interface works for every employee. It’s accessible across roles, languages, abilities, and geographies to ensure equitable usability regardless of context.

In practice, we see organizations that bring these attributes together in one place improve the day‑to‑day experience quickly: people find what they need faster, complete routine tasks with fewer steps, and feel more supported. Those improvements show up in the numbers — higher satisfaction and adoption, shorter time‑to‑task, and stronger retention.

If you want to thaw Cold Work and build early momentum, start with two moves:

Map moments of disconnection and impacted KPIs

Bring together HR, IT, Ops, and frontline teams to identify where disconnection shows up across people, business, and technology. Ground the picture in real employee input and operational data. From there, set the experience KPIs that matter — and establish a simple, ongoing measurement plan.

Pilot a small set of high-priority journeys

Choose two or three high-volume, high-friction processes (e.g., onboarding, finding a policy, submitting a request, resolving an issue). Orchestrate the systems behind them so each journey feels simple and human: one place to start, one clear flow, with AI micro interactions that summarize, route, suggest, or guide. Measure progress against KPIs and use the learnings to shape future pilots.

Cold Work freezes culture, driving disconnection and disengagement — but it doesn’t have to stay that way. Organizations that thrive will be those that build stronger connections by making work simpler, more human, and less draining. Intelligent experiences help make that possible: through better design, smarter tools, clearer measurement, and a single connected experience that helps every employee feel supported rather than overwhelmed.

About the Author

Matthew Dietly is a transformation strategist with 20 years in professional services – across management consulting, agency strategy, and digital transformation – who consistently identifies unmet needs and builds the capabilities to address them. He applies a human-centered lens to that work and believes that many business problems are best solved by understanding and addressing the underlying human problem first.

Most recently that’s meant two things at Infosys: building and leading an employee experience practice at WongDoody, developing the research, thought leadership, and client capabilities that established EX as a meaningful discipline within the agency, and now bringing that same human-centered, experience-led thinking to how Infosys pursues its largest and most complex deals.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions

Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

Why Your Org Chart Is Killing Innovation

April 13, 2026 by HRSAdmin

April 13, 2026

Why Your Org Chart Is Killing Innovation

By Karina Mangu-Ward

I keep a framed org chart on my office wall. Not because I think it’s useful. Because I think it’s one of the most beautiful lies in business.

It shows you who reports to whom. It signals seniority, span of control, the tidy logic of institutional order. What it does not show you is how work actually gets done: who calls whom when the real problem emerges at 4pm on a Thursday, which team has the actual authority to make the call, or why that promising initiative stalled for three months while two department heads quietly protected their turf.

In my work advising organizations on team performance, I’ve come to believe that most companies are trying to innovate using a management tool designed for a different era. The org chart was built for scale and optimization, for running a known process at volume. It was not built for the kind of creative, cross-functional, uncertain work that actually generates new value in today’s environment. And the gap between the two is where most innovation quietly dies.

Here’s the uncomfortable truth I open with whenever I’m in a room with senior HR leaders: three quarters of cross-functional teams are dysfunctional. That’s not my number; it comes from Harvard Business Review research. But it maps exactly to what I see on the ground. And yet cross-functional teams are the engine of value creation in modern organizations. Almost every significant product launch, market entry, or transformation effort runs through them.

Think about what that means. The organizational mechanism most responsible for generating new value is the one most likely to fail. That’s not a talent problem, and it’s not a strategy problem. It’s a structure problem. And that structure problem starts with the org chart.

When companies assemble cross-functional teams, they typically do it by looking at who’s available, who reports to the relevant manager, and who’s been trusted before. It feels efficient. It’s actually limiting. Because the org chart was never designed to answer the questions that matter most for innovative work: What capabilities do we actually need here? Who has the authority to make which decisions? And what happens when this team’s priorities conflict with someone’s day job?

I was talking recently with a leader at a Fortune 500 company about an innovation team that had every ingredient for success: the right talent, the budget, the executive sponsorship. And yet they were stuck. Moving too slow. Producing too little. When we dug in, the problem was clear: team members were getting conflicting instructions from their functional bosses. One person wasn’t even allowed to talk directly to a key stakeholder because that relationship had to be “carefully managed” through someone else. The org chart, with all its invisible chains of protocol and power, was overriding the team’s ability to function.

This dynamic is more common than most leaders want to admit. A huge proportion of what passes for meeting time in modern organizations isn’t really work. It’s coordination and political navigation. People meeting to figure out whose priorities win. People meeting to make sure the right person feels included before a decision gets made. People meeting because when the org chart doesn’t give you clarity, meetings feel like the next best substitute.

When I looked at this company’s calendar data, they weren’t short on time or effort. They were drowning in coordination overhead, a direct tax on innovation levied by structural ambiguity.

The mindset shift that I’ve seen unlock the most stuck teams sounds simple, but requires real discipline: start with the roles you need, not the people you know.

Most leaders build teams by asking, “Who do I trust? Who do I know? Who reports to me?” That instinct comes from a good place: familiarity reduces friction, shared history speeds things up. But what it actually produces is teams organized around comfort rather than capability. Teams that reflect the org chart rather than the challenge.

What I push leaders to do instead is start with the work. What is the purpose of this team? What does success look like in the next 90 days? And then: what roles (what specific capabilities and decision authorities) do we need to get there? Only once you’re clear on the roles do you fill them with souls.

This reframe changes everything. It forces you to be explicit about what the team actually needs. It opens the door to people who might not be in the usual network. And it creates the foundation for something that I think is the most underused tool in the innovation toolkit: a team charter.

A team charter is a living document that makes the implicit explicit. It captures why the team exists, what they’re trying to accomplish in a defined window, who holds which roles, and, critically, who has authority to make which decisions, even when others disagree. Even when that person’s boss disagrees.

For that Fortune 500 innovation team, the charter was the unlock. Once the team had documented what they were there to do, who could talk to whom, and which decisions lived with the team versus the hierarchy, the political noise dropped. They started shipping. The company was so struck by the result that they chartered 10 high-priority teams across the organization and sent them to work in the same way.

I’ve watched this happen enough times to believe something that sounds almost too simple: in a moment when we don’t have certainty, something we can have is clarity. The org chart won’t give you that. But a well-designed team charter will.

The org chart isn’t going away, and it shouldn’t. Hierarchy has its place, in performance management, in scale, in the systems that keep complex organizations running. But when it comes to the work of innovation, HR leaders have a real opportunity to push for structures that organize around purpose rather than reporting lines.

That means advocating for team charters before high-stakes cross-functional projects launch. It means helping senior leaders hold the duality (hierarchy and agile teaming) rather than assuming one replaces the other. It means being willing to say out loud what most people only mutter in hallways: the org chart shows you who reports to whom, but it tells you almost nothing about how work actually gets done.

Innovation doesn’t fail because people aren’t talented or motivated enough. It fails because we ask talented, motivated people to do uncertain, creative work inside structures designed for something else entirely. The org chart isn’t the villain, but mistaking it for a roadmap is.

About the Author

Karina Mangu-Ward has a decade of experience partnering with leading non profits, foundations, city agencies, and community stakeholders. At August, Karina is an organizational design consultant who helps nurture more creative, self-managing and productive teams. She’s partnered with New York City’s Department of Education, Sundance Institute, Planned Parenthood, PepsiCo and Chanel. Prior to joining August, she worked for 10 years for nonprofits, foundations, government agencies, and community networks tackling complex organizational and social challenges. Her passion is helping groups navigate ambiguity, gain insight and unlock highly complex challenges. Her forthcoming book, Teams That Meet the Moment: 9 Practices for Unlocking Performance and Growth in Uncertain Times is available for purchase in May 2026.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions

Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

The Un-Stressing Method: Three Simple Steps to Break the Burnout Cycle

March 25, 2026 by HRSAdmin

March 24, 2026

The Un-Stressing Method: Three Simple Steps to Break the Burnout Cycle

By Amy Leneker

The burnout cycle doesn’t start with collapse.

It starts with competence.

It starts with being the one people rely on. With saying yes because you can handle it. With pride in being dependable, capable, and composed under pressure. This is the burnout cycle in its most seductive form: High functioning on the outside. Hollowed out on the inside. Burnout among working Americans has surged to a six-year high—evidence that the way we’re working isn’t working.

Burnout isn’t just “being tired” or having a bad week at work. The World Health Organization defines burnout as an occupational phenomenon with three distinct dimensions: emotional exhaustion, mental distance or cynicism toward one’s job, and reduced professional efficacy. In real life, that looks like feeling drained before the day even starts, becoming detached or numb toward work that once mattered, and quietly questioning whether what you do makes any difference anymore. Burnout isn’t a motivation problem—it’s chronic workplace stress that hasn’t been managed.

The U.S. Department of Labor reports that chronic stress doesn’t just hurt individuals—it harms performance and culture. The ripple effects are felt across entire organizations:

Increases absenteeism. Ongoing stress takes a toll on physical and mental health, leading to more sick days, unplanned absences, and extended leaves;
Diminishes productivity. High-stress environments overload the brain, reduce focus, increase mistakes, and decrease overall performance;
Elevates risk of workplace incidents. Stress-related fatigue slows reaction time, clouds judgment, and increases the chances of accidents or safety violations; and
Erodes morale and exacerbates turnover. Chronic stress chips away at engagement and commitment, leaving employees dissatisfied and disengaged

And stress isn’t just a performance problem today; it’s a leadership problem for tomorrow. Stress is reshaping careers and leaving leadership pipelines at risk. The State of Stress and Joy at Work national study reports that large numbers of working Americans are opting out of leadership altogether due to stress. American workers report that due to work stress:

63% have considered leaving their career
61% avoid managing others
45% have lowered their career goals
44% have avoided promotions

It’s time for less stress and more joy at work—and beyond.

Here’s a simple un-stressing method 96% of American workers report as helpful in understanding and managing their stress.

The three steps are as follows:

1. See stress differently.

It all starts with two tiny questions that change everything: Is this important? and Do I have control over it? Most of our stress lives in the space where we skip the questions and jump straight to worry. But clarity changes that. When you pause to name what really matters and release what’s not yours to carry, everything changes. Based on your answers to the two questions, you place the stressor in the appropriate quadrant of The Un-Stressing Matrix™.

2. Sort stress into five actionable categories.

Not all stress is created equal and workplaces need to stop treating it like it is. There are five distinct types of work stress: Schedule, Suspense, Social, Sudden, and System.

Schedule Stress is from having too much to do and not enough time.
Suspense Stress is stress from waiting for what’s uncertain or looming and the anticipation causes stress.
Social Stress is from tension in relationships and team dynamics.
Sudden Stress is the stress that arrives unannounced and demands a response, such as an urgent request or a last-minute change.
System Stress is stress from structures, processes, and culture.

Each has its own behaviors, patterns, and solutions. Naming the type of stress allows you to solve the root problem of stress, not just a symptom.

3. Solve stress without spinning.

This is where we trade overthinking for doing. The matrix makes the next step visible without overthinking or analysis paralysis.

And then for the best part – celebrate the shift! The goal isn’t just less stress—it’s more joy. When you start using this method, you’ll free up time, space, and energy. You don’t need to earn joy or find joy. It’s been there all along—you just couldn’t see it behind the stress.

It’s time to stop the cycle of burnout and start leading your life.

About the Author

Amy Leneker is an optimistic, joy-seeking, recovering workaholic. She’s also a leadership consultant with over 25 years of leadership experience, including a decade in the C-suite, who has helped over 100,000 leaders, teams, and organizations (from Fortune 100 companies to the public sector) thrive at work through keynotes, coaching, and training, centered on less stress and more JOY. A first-generation college student, Amy earned both her undergraduate and graduate degrees while working full-time and later raising a family. She has studied leadership at Yale, neuroscience at the NeuroLeadership Institute, and stress resilience at Harvard Medical School. Amy has appeared in Fast Company, Inc., CEOWORLD Magazine, and other prestigious outlets. She is the author of the first national study on joy at work, The State of Stress and Joy at Work 2026: America’s Joy Problem, and Cheers to Monday is her first book.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions

Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital

Women’s History Month Series – In Conversation with Michelle Burton

March 24, 2026 by HRSAdmin

HR Spotlight Interview

Michelle Burton

Women's History Month Interview Series

In Conversation with Michelle Burton

Our special guest today is Michelle Burton, founder of North Star People & Leadership Advisory. With over 20 years of experience in people, culture, and leadership strategy, Michelle helps scaling businesses transition from founder-driven operations to sustainable, resilient models. A third-generation HR professional raised in a farming family, she brings a uniquely grounded, systems-thinking approach to the corporate world.

In this interview, Michelle challenges the stereotypes that frequently pigeonhole women in HR as the “office mom” or “policy police,” advocating instead for the role of the strategic business architect. She explains why the 2026 workforce is currently “recalibrating,” shares her structured approach to fixing the notorious “broken rung” of leadership, and reveals why she wants to ban the buzzword “bandwidth” forever.

Thank you for joining us, Michelle! If you could clear the air right now, what’s the one thing you wish every employee understood about your job?

Michelle Burton:

If I could clear the air on one thing, it’s this: HR’s role is not about enforcing rules for the sake of it; it’s about enabling organizations and their people to perform at their best as the business grows.

At its core, HR creates the structure, clarity, and leadership capability that allow teams to succeed in a scaling environment. My role is to balance the needs of the organization with the growth, well-being, and engagement of its employees.

From the outside, some decisions may feel transactional. But behind every policy, process, or difficult conversation is an effort to create fairness, consistency, and stability across the business.

It’s also important to understand that HR isn’t there to take sides. Our responsibility is to steward the long-term health of the organization by protecting the business while ensuring employees experience an environment where they can contribute and grow.

When HR functions well, it becomes a strategic driver that helps organizations move from reactive people management to intentional leadership, which is essential to scaling companies.

Nobody plans to go into HR. They usually get dragged into it because they’re good at listening. Is that true for you? What was the moment you realized you were meant to do this?

Michelle Burton:

Listening is certainly foundational, but for me the turning point was realizing how deeply people strategy shapes an organization’s ability to grow.

Early in my career, I supported a team navigating significant change as the business expanded. What became clear was that the challenge wasn’t just operational, it was structural and leadership related. Roles were evolving, expectations were unclear, and leaders were learning how to manage at a new level.

Being part of the process that helped bring clarity, strengthen leadership capability, and stabilize the team showed me the real impact HR can have. That was the moment I realized HR isn’t just about supporting employees, it’s about helping organizations mature and scale in a sustainable way.

That intersection of people, leadership, and growth is what drew me fully into this field.

HR requires a mix of skills—part lawyer, part therapist, part data analyst. If you strip away the job title, what’s the one superpower you rely on most when the office is on fire?

Michelle Burton:

Strategic Perspective.

In moments of conflict or crisis, it’s easy for organizations to become reactive. My role is to step back and look at the broader system, what’s actually driving the issue, what the organization is trying to achieve, and how the decision we make today will affect the culture and leadership environment long term.

That perspective allows me to move beyond simply solving the immediate problem and instead strengthen the systems around it, whether that’s leadership capability, role clarity, or decision-making structures.

The ability to connect people challenges to broader business strategy becomes one of the most valuable tools HR can bring to the table.

If you could describe the current mood of the workforce in 2026 using just one word, what would it be and why?

Michelle Burton:

Recalibrating.

Over the past several years, employees and organizations alike have experienced significant shifts, from remote work debates to economic uncertainty and evolving expectations around leadership and culture.

What we’re seeing now is a recalibration. Employees are reassessing what they value in work, while organizations are redefining what effective leadership, productivity, and culture look like in a modern workplace.

For HR leaders, this moment is less about returning to old models and more about helping organizations design workplaces that are clearer, more intentional, and better aligned with how people actually work today.

The conversation has shifted to the ‘glass cliff,’ where women are promoted during times of crisis. Have you ever felt that pressure to be the fixer in a broken system?

Michelle Burton:

It’s a dynamic many leaders, irrespective of gender identity, experience at different points in their careers.

Often those opportunities arise during moments of instability or transformation, when organizations need someone who can step in, stabilize the environment, and create a path forward.

While that pressure can be significant, I tend to view those moments through a strategic lens. Challenging environments often reveal the underlying structural issues within an organization including but not limited to unclear leadership layers, decision-making bottlenecks, or misaligned expectations.

When approached thoughtfully, those situations become opportunities to build stronger systems, strengthen leadership capability, and create more sustainable foundations for growth.

In many ways, those are the moments where HR leadership can have its greatest long-term impact.

Women in HR are often pigeonholed as the “office mom” or the “policy police.” How do you dismantle those stereotypes and ensure you’re seen as a strategic business architect first?

Michelle Burton:

The most effective way to dismantle that stereotype is by consistently operating at the level of business strategy, not just policy administration.

In my work, I focus on helping leadership teams think about how people strategy directly supports growth, whether that’s building the next layer of leadership, clarifying decision-making structures, or designing systems that allow teams to scale without chaos.

When HR is positioned as the function that brings clarity to how work happens, how leaders lead, and how organizations evolve as they grow, the conversation naturally shifts. You are no longer seen as the person enforcing rules, you’re seen as someone helping architect the organization itself.

HR professionals are the first responders of the corporate world, handling grief, layoffs, and conflict. What is your protocol for protecting your own peace after absorbing everyone else’s stress?

Michelle Burton:

One of the most important disciplines in HR is emotional boundaries.

You have to be deeply empathetic while also recognizing that you cannot personally carry every situation you support. My approach is to treat difficult situations with full presence in the moment by listening intently, responding thoughtfully, and ensuring people feel heard, but once the decision is made or the conversation is complete, I deliberately step back.

I also rely on reflection and perspective. In HR, the work is meaningful precisely because it involves real human experiences. Protecting your own well-being allows you to continue showing up with clarity and composure for the next challenge.

Without naming names, tell us about a time you had to deliver tough news that taught you something profound about leadership or empathy.

Michelle Burton:

Early in my career, I had to communicate a restructuring that impacted a small but close-knit team. Naturally, the immediate focus was on the operational change, but what stayed with me most was the emotional response from employees who felt uncertainty about their future and their value within the organization.

What that experience taught me is that leadership during difficult moments isn’t just about the message, it’s about the dignity with which people experience the process. Clarity, honesty, and respect matter enormously.

Since then, I’ve approached difficult conversations with the understanding that how organizations treat people in their hardest moments defines the culture far more than how they operate when things are easy.

Have you ever felt pressure to soften your delivery or be “nice” in ways male counterparts may not? How do you balance empathy with the need to be firm on policy?

Michelle Burton:

There can sometimes be an expectation that women in leadership communicate in a softer or more accommodating way. Over time, I’ve learned that empathy and clarity are not mutually exclusive.

My approach is to be direct, transparent, and respectful. People generally respond well when expectations and decisions are communicated clearly, even if the message is difficult.

Empathy comes from understanding the human side of the situation, while firmness comes from ensuring consistency and fairness across the organization. When both are present, the conversation tends to feel balanced rather than confrontational.

The age-old tension is between people and profits. Can you share an example where you had to advocate for something that didn’t have an immediate ROI but was critical for culture?

Michelle Burton:

There are moments when investing in people systems doesn’t produce an immediate financial return, but it creates the conditions for long-term performance.

One example was advocating for leadership development during a period when the organization was scaling quickly. At the time, some viewed it as a discretionary expense. However, the reality was that many of the organization’s challenges such as communication breakdowns, decision delays and team friction were rooted in leaders who had been promoted quickly without the tools to lead effectively.

Investing in leadership capability didn’t show up as an instant ROI line item, but it strengthened decision-making, improved team cohesion, and ultimately allowed the organization to scale more sustainably.

Sometimes the most valuable investments in an organization are the ones that build the leadership and cultural foundations for long-term growth.

We talk a lot about gut feeling in hiring. How are you using data to challenge biases—your own or hiring managers’—when it comes to promoting women and underrepresented talent?

Michelle Burton:

Gut instinct can be valuable, but when it becomes the primary decision-making tool in hiring or promotions, it often reinforces existing biases.

The way to counter that is by introducing structured decision frameworks. That means clearly defined competencies for each role, standardized interview questions, established career path frameworks and tracking promotion and hiring patterns over time. When you look at the data on who is being considered, who is advancing, and where people stall, you start to see patterns that aren’t always visible in individual decisions.

For leadership teams, that data becomes a mirror. It shifts the conversation from personal judgment to evidence-based decision-making. The goal isn’t to eliminate human judgment, but to ensure that judgment is applied consistently and fairly so that talented people aren’t overlooked simply because they don’t fit an unspoken mold.

Statistically, women often get stuck at the first step up to manager. As an HR leader, what is one systemic change you’ve implemented—or want to—that actually fixes this broken rung?

Michelle Burton:

One of the biggest barriers at that first promotion level is that organizations often rely on informal sponsorship and visibility to identify future managers. The problem is that informal systems tend to benefit the people who are already closest to leadership.

A systemic solution is to make leadership readiness more transparent and intentional. That means defining what ‘ready for leadership’ actually looks like through clear leadership competencies, leadership expectations, and development opportunities that employees can actively pursue.

Several years ago, I developed a Leadership Potential Assessment and Feedback Report that I still use as a practical tool in organizations. I have refined this leadership potential assessment over the years across the changing business landscapes. The purpose of the assessment is to move the conversation about leadership potential from subjective impressions to more structured evaluation. The tool evaluates emerging leaders across a set of core leadership dimensions.

What makes this tool valuable is the feedback component. Instead of simply labelling someone as a ‘high potential leader’ or ‘not ready’, the report highlights specific strengths and development areas tied to leadership expectations. It provides clear insights into where they already demonstrate leadership behaviours and where they may need further development. The report also outlines practical development actions that help individuals intentionally build the skills required for their first, or next leadership role.

For more seasoned leaders, I administer a Leadership Effectiveness Analysis and Feedback Report. While the Leadership Potential Assessment focuses on readiness for a first leadership role, the Leadership Effectiveness Analysis looks at how leaders are actually showing up once they are in the role and how their leadership is experienced by others.

When organizations create structured leadership pathways rather than relying on informal nominations, it opens the door for more people to see themselves as potential leaders and to prepare for that role in a meaningful way. It transforms leadership development from something exclusive into something accessible.

What is the biggest myth about working in HR that you wish would die?

Michelle Burton:

The biggest myth is that HR is simply an administrative or compliance function.

In reality, HR is one of the few functions that has visibility into how the entire organization operates, how leaders lead, how teams collaborate, and where structural issues are slowing the business down.

When HR operates strategically, it becomes a critical partner in organizational design. It helps leadership teams think about how to scale decision-making, develop stronger leaders, and build cultures that support sustained performance. That’s a very different role than the traditional perception of HR as just managing policies or people administration.

If you could ban one corporate buzzword forever, what would it be?

Michelle Burton:

Probably the word ‘bandwidth.’

It’s often used as shorthand for workload, but it can obscure the real conversation organizations need to have; which is about priorities, resources, and leadership clarity.

When teams constantly say they don’t have the bandwidth, it’s usually a signal that expectations aren’t aligned or the organization has outgrown its current structure. Instead of relying on buzzwords, leaders should focus on creating clearer priorities, clear communication through ALL levels of the organization and more sustainable ways of working.

HR is often described as a thankless job. You’re the villain when things go wrong and invisible when things go right. Why do you stay? What is the moment that reminds you this is why you do this?

Michelle Burton:

For me, the most meaningful moments happen when you see the long-term impact of the work.

It might be a leader who once struggled with managing their team but, after developing the right skills and support, becomes someone their employees genuinely respect and trust. Or an organization that once operated in constant reactive mode finding a rhythm and clarity as its leadership and operational structure matures.

Those moments don’t always make headlines, but they represent real transformation. Seeing individuals grow and organizations become healthier, more effective environments for people to work; that’s what makes the work worthwhile.

“Empathy and clarity are not mutually exclusive.”

That powerful insight from Michelle Burton is a masterclass in modern leadership. Her approach reminds us that true empathy isn’t about softening the truth to avoid discomfort; it is about treating people with dignity, transparency, and respect, especially during an organization’s most difficult moments.

As we celebrate Women’s History Month, Michelle’s dedication to building stronger leaders and healthier organizational systems serves as a vital blueprint for the future of work. Thank you, Michelle, for sharing your strategic vision and grounded wisdom.

Michelle Burton is the founder of North Star People & Leadership Advisory, a developing advisory focused on helping scaling businesses strengthen leadership capability and align people strategy with growth. She is currently establishing the firm to partner with founders and executive teams navigating the complexities of expansion, including building the next layer of leadership and creating clearer organizational structures. Michelle has more than 20 years in people, culture and leadership strategy. A third-generation HR professional raised in a farming family, she brings a grounded work ethic and practical approach to developing leaders and building resilient organisations. Michelle’s work centers on practical, strategic guidance that helps companies transition from founder-driven operations to more sustainable, scalable leadership models that support long-term growth.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Individual Contributors:

Answer our latest queries and submit your unique insights: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxInsight

Submit your article: https://bit.ly/SubmitBrandWorxArticle

PR Representatives:

Answer the latest queries and submit insights for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxInsightSubmissions

Submit an article for your client: https://bit.ly/BrandWorxArticleSubmissions

Please direct any additional questions to: connect@brandworx.digital