Menu

leadership

Leading with Intent: Unpacking the Habits Shaping Modern Leadership

by

Leading with Intent: Unpacking the Habits Shaping Modern Leadership

Leadership today demands remarkable flexibility and self-awareness, driven by swift technological progress, changing employee expectations, and intricate global challenges. 

Success as a leader now relies not just on embracing new behaviors but also on purposefully letting go of obsolete practices. 

This deliberate shift profoundly shapes team interactions, organizational culture, and overall business performance. 

What specific habits have leading executives and HR professionals chosen to discard, and which new ones have they intentionally adopted? 

This article distills their critical experiences, offering a practical roadmap for thought leaders and influencers seeking to enhance their leadership style and drive meaningful transformation in their organizations.

Read on!

Ben Richardson
Owner, Acuity Training

Ben Richardson

I no longer made up my mind in a hurry without consulting my team. In the beginning, I believed that fast decisions would ensure that things progress, but on many occasions, it resulted in several oversights and lost opportunities.

When I learnt to give the team time and listen to their ideas, I began making better decisions. As a result of this change, the team felt more appreciated and the overall decision making process became more agreeable and thus the outcomes were enhanced.

I also made it a habit to concentrate on long-term development rather than just short-term outcomes. I began actively engaging in the team’s growth through training and helpful criticism rather to just taking care of the daily responsibilities.

The impact of this adjustment was significant. The team became more driven, self-assured, and prepared to take on more difficult tasks. Performance and general morale significantly improved as a result.

Robbin Schuchmann
Co-founder & HR Professional, EOR Overview

Robbin Schuchmann

I altered my micromanaging ways, and this was one of the best choices I made. I used to believe that participation in every small moment would mean smooth progress. However, it proved to be time-consuming and caused frustrations to my staff. They felt like having more responsibility and I was keeping them down.

Rather, I took a deliberate step towards trusting my team. I had developed the expectations and provided them with the autonomy to come up with decisions. The shift was absolutely instant. They became more responsible at work, which resulted in rapid decision-making, more adequate problem-solving, and the very feeling that they were sure about their jobs.

This gave a boost in productivity and more motivation to the team. I was able to concentrate more on the larger picture which facilitated the growth of the business. The immediate effect? Better efficiency, increased team dynamics and improved overall results.

Zach Shepard
Principal, Braddock Investment Group Inc

Zach Shepard

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was micromanaging. While it came from a place of wanting to ensure quality, it stifled creativity and trust within the team. Instead, I intentionally adopted the habit of delegating with clarity and trust, providing clear expectations and then stepping back to let team members take ownership.

The direct outcome was a noticeable boost in team morale, productivity, and innovation, as people felt more empowered and confident in their roles.

Gena B. McCown
Author, Speaker, Leadership Expert, Lead Her with Purpose

Gena B. McCown

One leadership habit I consciously dropped in recent years was overscheduling myself. Pre-2020, my calendar was a nonstop stream of meetings, tasks, and commitments. I was leaving zero margin for rest, reflection, or flexibility.

When the world shut down during COVID-19, that packed calendar went silent. And in that silence, I realized how unhealthy and unsustainable my pace had been.

As things reopened, I made a deliberate choice: not everything was invited back to my calendar.

Now, I’m more intentional about what I say yes to. I build in white space, protect my energy, and make thoughtful commitments.

The direct outcome? Improved mental clarity, better decision-making, and most importantly, a healthier team culture.

By modeling margin, I’m giving others permission to do the same. Rest isn’t a weakness, it’s wisdom.

Freeing up my time allowed me to pick up a new habit of continual learning. I began investing time in Coursera and LinkedIn Learning modules are often free, always valuable.

As a leader, it’s easy to focus so much on teaching that we forget to keep learning.

This shift has helped me stay sharp, curious, and relevant. I bring fresher ideas to the table and demonstrate that growth doesn’t have an expiration date, regardless of career stage.

Miriam Groom
CEO, Mindful Career Coaching

Miriam Groom

As someone who coaches leaders navigating change—whether personal or organizational—I’ve come to realize that leadership isn’t just about acquiring new habits. It’s just as much about letting go of outdated ones.

Over the past few years, as the workplace evolved through uncertainty, remote dynamics, and greater calls for inclusivity, I made a deliberate shift in how I lead. It involved letting go of performative productivity and embracing intentional vulnerability.

For years, I operated under a habit many leaders unconsciously adopt: hyper-responsiveness as proof of effectiveness. I answered emails late at night, stayed visible on Slack during every waking hour, and prided myself on being the first in and last out. At the time, I thought this demonstrated commitment.

What I dropped was this constant availability. I stopped glorifying myself. I began blocking time to think, giving slower, more thoughtful responses, and encouraging boundaries. This wasn’t easy—especially in an age where overcommunication is mistaken for leadership.

In place of that old habit, I adopted a new one: modeling vulnerability and curiosity, especially when I don’t have all the answers. Rather than making polished speeches or pretending to have a five-year plan when things felt uncertain, I started saying things like, “I’m not sure yet, but I’d love your thoughts,” or “Here’s what I’m wrestling with.” I began opening team meetings with check-in questions that weren’t just about KPIs, but about what people needed to feel supported. I even started sharing personal growth challenges in 1:1s—whether it was around public speaking anxiety or evolving my own blind spots on equity and inclusion.

In my own team, I implemented “fail-forward Fridays,” a space where we share what didn’t go as planned that week. The point isn’t to fix it—but to normalize setbacks as part of growth. That one habit boosted psychological safety so much that even new hires speak up sooner and contribute creatively earlier in their onboarding cycle.

Dropping the habit of always being “on” and embracing intentional vulnerability transformed how I lead. It reminded me that leadership isn’t about being infallible—it’s about being real, creating space for others to show up fully, and trusting that empowerment is more powerful than control. In doing so, I didn’t lose authority—I gained influence. And more importantly, I built a culture where others could lead alongside me, not beneath me.

Christopher Farley
Owner, Flippin’ Awesome Adventures

Christopher Farley

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was trying to handle everything myself. I used to think I was being a supportive leader by taking on extra tasks to help the team, but really it just left me burned out and didn’t give others a chance to step up.

The habit I intentionally adopted was holding weekly check-ins with each team member. These are quick 15 to 20-minute meetings where we talk about their progress, roadblocks, and goals, but also check in on how they’re feeling in general.

The direct outcome has been huge. Team members feel more supported, communication is clearer, and I can catch small issues before they turn into bigger problems. Plus, it’s helped me delegate more effectively because I know exactly where everyone stands. Overall, it’s created a stronger sense of trust and accountability on the team.

Joe Spisak
CEO, Fulfill

Joe Spisak

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was micromanagement. Early in my career at Zapiy.com, I believed being deeply involved in every detail demonstrated commitment. I resisted when my business coach advised delegating more aggressively—even tasks I thought only I could handle well. I was hesitant to give up control, fearing it might compromise quality.

The shift happened gradually. I realized that by holding too tightly to operational decisions, I was creating bottlenecks and limiting our growth potential. More importantly, I was preventing team members from developing their capabilities. When I finally stepped back and empowered my team with meaningful responsibility, not only did they rise to the occasion, but our organization became more nimble and innovative.

Conversely, I’ve intentionally adopted data-driven decision making. The 3PL industry has traditionally operated on relationships and gut feelings. Coming from tech, I knew there was tremendous opportunity in bringing analytical rigor to fulfillment.

We’ve transformed how we match eCommerce businesses with 3PL partners by building sophisticated data models that quantify performance metrics and predict costs with remarkable accuracy—92% in many cases. For instance, we helped Kiss My Keto identify inefficiencies in carrier selection through data analysis, reducing their carrier rates by 41% for heavier packages and saving hundreds of thousands annually.

The outcome of these leadership changes has been transformative. Delegating has freed me to focus on strategic growth while cultivating a more capable team. Meanwhile, our data-driven approach has revolutionized how we create value in an industry that was ripe for innovation. Together, these shifts have allowed us to scale while delivering measurable ROI for our clients.

Travis Rieken
Sr. Director of Product Management, Easy Ice

Travis Rieken

I stopped answering too quickly.

I used to jump in with solutions the moment a problem came up. It felt efficient, but it shut down the conversation. Teams held back their ideas. Decisions moved fast but often missed better options. I changed that habit. I started listening longer, letting others share their thoughts first.

That shift led to stronger discussions. People spoke up more. They took more responsibility. Outcomes improved because ideas were pressure-tested, not just followed.

I focused more on clarity than control. Instead of trying to guide every move, I worked to make priorities obvious. When people understand what matters, they align faster. That shift helped us avoid wasted effort and made it easier to adjust when things changed.

Clear goals gave the team confidence to make the right calls without waiting for approval. The result was fewer delays and tighter focus across the board.

Leadership habits either block progress or make room for it. Letting go of control and focusing on clarity shifted how the team moved. That created better results without adding pressure.

Colin Potts
Chief Operating Officer, Regenerative Orthopedics & Sports Medicine

Colin Potts

Leadership Habit Shift: Dropping the Micromanagement and Adopting Active Listening

As a leader, it’s tempting to be involved in every detail, especially when you care deeply about the work that is being done. But in recent years, I have dropped my habit of micromanaging everything. I realized that this approach stifles creativity and trust within the team.

By trying to control everything, I was not allowing others to step up and prove their abilities through what they could do. The direct outcome was a healthier work culture; employees felt more empowered, and our productivity increased as a result of that.

But simultaneously, I replace the habit of micromanagement with active listening. I now try to listen to the different perspectives my team offers instead of jumping straight to solutions. This helped promote a culture of open communication throughout the organization while strengthening my relationship with my team.

They now feel more heard and valued which fosters a more collaborative and innovative environment. The outcomes of these changes were amazing; we now achieve better results with a more engaged and highly motivated team.

Sometimes leadership is not about doing more, it’s about doing less and allowing the strengths of your team to shine. I now feel like a more effective leader who is focused on long-term success and one who fosters a culture of trust simply by learning the importance of active listening and getting rid of micromanagement.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Conscious Leadership: Refining Habits for Leadership Impact

by

Conscious Leadership: Refining Habits for Leadership Impact

Leadership in today’s organizational structure demands an unparalleled level of adaptability and self-awareness.

The rapid pace of technological change, evolving workforce expectations, and global complexities necessitate a continuous re-evaluation of ingrained practices.

For leaders, true effectiveness now hinges not just on what new habits they adopt, but also on which long-standing ones they consciously shed.

This transformative process, driven by intentionality, profoundly impacts team dynamics, organizational culture, and ultimately, business outcomes.

What specific leadership habits have prominent business executives and HR professionals consciously dropped, and which new ones have they intentionally cultivated?

This HR Spotlight article distills their invaluable experiences, offering a strategic blueprint for thought leaders and authorities seeking to refine their own leadership approach and drive meaningful change within their organizations.

Read on!

Niclas Schlopsna
Managing Consultant & CEO, spectup

Niclas Schlopsna

I stopped micromanaging. In the early days at Spectup, especially when we scaled our offerings beyond pitch decks, I had this habit of reviewing everything—slides, emails, even internal memos. It came from a good place, but it slowed things down and made the team overly reliant on my sign-off.

At one point, one of our team members casually asked if she should send me her calendar invite before scheduling a client call—and that was the moment I realized how far I’d taken it.

What I adopted instead was structured delegation with accountability. I started trusting people more, giving them clearer ownership and room to make decisions, but with measurable outcomes tied to each initiative.

That shift directly freed up my time to focus on higher-impact partnerships and product strategy. It also created a stronger culture—people at Spectup began taking more initiative, and client satisfaction noticeably improved because decisions were made faster. Letting go felt risky at first, but it’s one of the best leadership habits I’ve built.

Jamie Frew
CEO, Carepatron

Jamie Frew

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was always needing to have the answers. Early on, I felt pressure to jump in, solve problems fast, and give clear direction on everything. But over time, I saw that it was limiting the team. It made decisions flow through me and slowed down momentum.

The habit I adopted instead was asking better questions. I started asking things like “What do you think is the best next move?” or “What’s the outcome we’re aiming for here?”

That shift gave people more autonomy to us at Carepatron. It created space for better thinking, better solutions, and faster growth. People started making stronger decisions without needing constant input. They took more initiative, and the whole team moved with more confidence.

Shishir Khedkar
Head of Engineering, scoredata

Shishir Khedkar

Here is one habit I dropped and another one that I adopted intentionally.

Always Having the Answer: Why I dropped it: For a long time, I was under the assumption that strong leadership meant being the smartest person in the room—having quick answers to every question. It fed my ego, but quietly stifled team growth. I realized this “heroic” leadership style unintentionally made others hesitant to speak up or take initiative.

Instead, I actively changed to respond with questions like, “What do you think?” or “How would you approach it?” to create space for others to lead. I also instilled and embraced the attitude of asking my team members to come to me with options to their questions to foster independent thinking.

As a result of this, it transformed the team dynamic. Engagement increased, problem-solving became more collaborative, and people took more ownership. It also freed up my mental bandwidth to focus on strategy rather than tactical firefighting.

Adopted candid feedback on a regular basis. Why I adopted it: I used to think feedback was something formal—annual reviews, structured surveys. But I noticed high-performing teams had a constant rhythm of open feedback, both top-down and bottom-up.

I introduced short, informal check-ins and encouraged a culture of “feedback in the moment”. I also modeled vulnerability by asking, “What’s one thing I could do better this week?” and “How can I help you do your job better?” during my one-on-one meetings.

What happened was amazing. Trust deepened. Team performance improved because course corrections happened in real time. It also made me more coachable and aware of blind spots I didn’t know I had.

In summary: Letting go of the need to always have the answer empowered others, and it allowed me to practice a “continuous learning” mode. Embracing ongoing feedback made the whole team, including myself, sharper and more adaptive.

Joe Horan
Owner & CEO, Jumper Bee

Joe Horan

I dropped the habit of stepping into every decision. For a long time, I believed staying involved in each task meant staying in control. What it did was slow people down. It created hesitation. Team members waited instead of moving.

I was blocking their growth. Letting go felt risky at first, but the results proved otherwise. People started owning their roles. They moved quickly. They solved issues without checking in. The overall pace picked up, and accountability improved across the board.

I picked up clarity. I started focusing on setting direction, not controlling movement. I made sure everyone knew the goals and priorities for the week. It didn’t need to be complicated—just clear. Once the team understood where we were going, they started making better calls without waiting. Communication got easier. The day-to-day became smoother.

Dropping control and adding clarity changed how I lead. It gave the team space to grow and gave me time to focus on bigger decisions. Leadership shifted from managing tasks to building trust. The team became faster, sharper, and more independent. The company moved forward without constant supervision. That shift made the biggest difference.

Vikrant Bhalodia
Head of Marketing & People Ops, WeblineIndia

Vikrant Bhalodia

A leadership habit I consciously dropped was being the “fixer” in every situation. I used to step in too quickly whenever there was a roadblock, thinking I was helping. In reality, I was unintentionally slowing down the team’s growth and decision-making confidence.

Letting go of that habit wasn’t easy, but I started asking more questions instead of giving answers, pushing people to think through their own solutions. It shifted accountability and built a stronger sense of ownership across the board.

What I intentionally adopted was carving out weekly one-on-ones that are strictly non-operational: no project updates, no task lists. Just space for open dialogue, feedback, career goals, or even just a venting session.

That habit alone created a deeper trust and gave me early visibility into morale shifts I would’ve otherwise missed. And it’s helped with retention more than any formal engagement initiative.

George Fironov
Co-Founder & CEO, Talmatic

George Fironov

I forgot about such things as micromanaging because it created bottlenecks and decreased team ownership. Instead, I intentionally developed a habit of setting clear expectations and trusting that the team would execute.

And as a result, decision-making speeded up, team members gained confidence, and overall project outcomes were improved with fewer controls.

Betsy Pepine
Owner & Real Estate Broker, Pepine Realty

Betsy Pepine

I dropped the habit of controlling every decision. I believed strong leadership meant staying involved in each choice and guiding every step. That habit slowed growth. Others waited for direction instead of acting.

I adopted the habit of stepping back. I trusted people to handle challenges. I listened more and spoke less. The result: faster progress, stronger teamwork, more confidence across the board. People learned from mistakes, found solutions, and took pride in their work.

Strong leadership builds others. Letting go of control created space for new leaders to rise and the team to grow stronger together.

Tia Smith
CEO & Founder, Ignite Consulting

Tia Smith

One leadership habit I dropped in recent years: over-functioning.

For most of my career, I equated leadership with being the one who always had the answer, carried the weight, and picked up the slack. I was the “fixer”—the person others relied on when things got messy. Promotions came. Praise followed. And so did burnout.

Over-functioning masquerades as excellence, but it’s really a trust issue in disguise. I didn’t realize how much I was robbing others of growth until I started stepping back. Delegating isn’t about lightening your load—it’s about raising the ceiling for the whole team.

Over time, I saw my team step up in ways I hadn’t anticipated. Fully. Authentically. One employee took the lead on two initiatives I had always owned and absolutely crushed it. Another pitched a bold idea I never would’ve considered—and it worked. Turns out, when you stop doing it all, people don’t drop the ball. They rise.

One leadership habit I adopted: listening longer. Not active listening. Not empathetic nodding. I mean intentionally holding space without rushing to solution, reaction, or resolution. It sounds simple—but it was a massive recalibration for someone wired to move fast and solve things.

Especially in the culture and people space, what someone isn’t saying is often more important than what they are. Learning to listen for hesitation, pattern, or fatigue under the surface has helped me lead with greater precision—and greater humanity.

It’s harder than it sounds. Especially when you’ve been trained to solve, fix, respond. But listening like this changes things. It deepens trust. It reveals the real issues, not just the polished ones. It invites honesty—not just with others, but with yourself.

That single habit—staying quiet a little longer—has changed how I coach, consult, and lead. It’s helped me hear beneath the noise, to the signal that really matters.

Sometimes the most powerful shift in leadership isn’t something new we add. It’s something we’re finally willing to release.

Nick Vitucci
Head of Marketing, Declare Media

Nick Vitucci

One leadership habit I consciously dropped was feeling the need to have all the answers. Early on, I thought leading meant solving every problem myself, but it led to burnout and bottlenecks. Instead, I adopted a habit of asking better questions and letting the team take more ownership in decision-making.

This shift empowered others to step up, sparked better ideas, and created a stronger sense of shared accountability. As a direct result, our workflow became smoother, team morale improved, and we started delivering projects faster with more creativity and confidence.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Mending the Trust Divide: Strategies for a More Engaged Workforce

by

Mending the Trust Divide: Strategies for a More Engaged Workforce

The 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer, unveiled in January, has sounded a wake-up call, exposing a troubling global decline in employee trust: Only 75% of workers now believe their employers “do the right thing,” a steep 3-point drop from previous years that underscores a widening trust gap in workplaces worldwide.

As organizations navigate a landscape marked by remote work fatigue, economic uncertainty, and a 3.5% unemployment rate (SHRM, 2025), this erosion of confidence threatens morale, productivity, and retention.

The Techronicler team reached out to a powerhouse panel of HR experts and business leaders to confront this pressing challenge with a critical query:

As an HR or business leader, what practical steps would you suggest to rebuild trust and address this workplace challenge?

Their insightful, hands-on strategies—ranging from transparent communication to innovative engagement initiatives—promise to bridge the divide and reignite a culture of trust.

Dive into their expert roadmaps and discover how to transform your workplace for the better!

Read on!

Kurt Uhlir
Chief Marketing Officer, eZ Home Search

Kurt Uhlir

Let’s stop pretending the trust gap is just about layoffs or bad CEOs—it’s about a lack of clarity and connection.

In my experience leading high-growth companies and coaching other GTM leaders, I see two major breakdowns behind today’s erosion in employee trust.

First, there’s a transparency gap:- Too many leadership teams fail to explain the why behind business decisions. I’m not saying share every spreadsheet—but employees should understand the key outcomes the company is aiming for, across different timeframes. Just as important, they need to know how their day-to-day work contributes. Without that, people feel like bystanders. So when leaders say “we missed our numbers,” it doesn’t feel honest—it feels disconnected. In hindsight, employees often realize they could’ve helped—if only someone had taken the time to connect the dots. Leaders need to remember, sometimes you have to go slow to go fast—or go far.

Second, return-to-office mandates have fractured trust by ignoring how distributed teams really operate:- I’ve said this before, and it keeps proving true: Once your team expands beyond a single office, every additional location functionally becomes remote. That’s when your workplace strategy either scales your culture—or erodes it. I’m not hiring people to sit in a building. I’m hiring them to drive results. Many RTO policies send the wrong message: “We don’t trust you unless we can see you.” That’s a culture killer. And the irony? With modern tools, I have better visibility into performance today than ever before.

Rebuilding trust takes more than a town hall or a Slack update. It requires intentional leadership, visible actions, and repeated clarity. Start there—and the culture will follow.

Margaret Buj
Principal Recruiter, Mixmax

Margaret Buj

Trust is built in the small moments- clear communication, fair treatment, and follow-through. At Mixmax, we operate with a lot of transparency: hiring managers and leadership share strategy updates regularly, and we don’t over-promise.

In my coaching work, the companies that retain trust even in hard times are the ones that:

  • Acknowledge uncertainty honestly.
  • Involve employees in decisions where possible.
  • Follow through on what they say they’ll do (e.g., support for DEI, real investment in wellness, not just performative posts).

Trust can’t be rebuilt overnight, but consistency matters. One leader I worked with started weekly “Ask Me Anything” sessions during a reorg – it turned employee anxiety into collaboration.

Dr. Kirk Adams
Disability Inclusion Strategist & Speaker, Innovative Impact LLC

Dr. Kirk Adams

To rebuild trust in the workplace, especially from a disability inclusion standpoint, leaders must prioritize accessibility, representation, and open communication.

Start by embedding disability inclusion into core values and policies. Ensure all digital and physical environments meet or exceed accessibility standards, and provide reasonable accommodations proactively, not reactively.

Establish Employee Resource Groups (ERGs), which are voluntary, employee-led groups that support community and belonging, for people with disabilities. Make sure these groups have executive sponsorship. Inclusive hiring practices, visible leadership commitment, and regular training on disability awareness foster a culture of respect. Involve employees with disabilities in decision-making processes.

Nothing about us without us. Transparent communication about progress and challenges builds credibility and trust. When employees feel seen, heard, and supported, trust follows.

Genevieve Piturro
Founder, Genevieve Piturro LLC

Genevieve Piturro

The change-maker for building trust between management and employees is right in front of us, a truth we’ve always known in our hearts – genuine human connection. It has taken me 25 years to fully embrace the leadership truth that human connection is the expression of love – and love is the key to success for all of us growing our organizations.

Here are a few ways leaders can build trust:

Start each day by asking yourself, “What can I do to bring people together?”: Have some fun and surprise everyone with a long lunch and a game tournament! Try Checkers, Monopoly, even Family Feud! Or, go bigger and bring in a pro to facilitate a Murder Mystery event! While together, highlight uplifting news or updates on a current goal to inspire engaging conversation. Having team fun will last far longer than one day.

“Do you have 30 minutes today? I’d like to know how it’s going.”: Invite someone you’re still getting to know for a one-on-one. Let them know you’re interested in how they’re doing with the project they’re working on and if they have any special weekend or summer plans coming up. Let your heart lead your conversation – it knows exactly what to do – and say.

“What’s one skill that most people don’t know you have?”: It’s SPRING – Take it Outside! Enjoy the smell of flowers and soak up some sun by moving your team – and your conversations outside. Make it fun by ordering a picnic lunch complete with fruit, cheese, sandwiches, chips, and dessert. Start off by asking each team member to answer one question such as, “What’s 1 skill that most people don’t know you have?”

Ruth Rathblott
Speaker, Author, Ruth Rathblott

Ruth Rathblott

The drop in employee trust isn’t just about policies or perks, or just a data point; it reflects something deeper: people don’t feel safe to fully show up at work.

As someone who hid my limb difference for 25 years, I know the toll it takes to pretend everything’s fine—to stay quiet, to overperform in hopes of belonging. That same dynamic plays out in workplaces every day.

And as a former CEO, I also know what it’s like to be in the leadership seat—wanting to build trust with your team, but not always knowing if you’re creating the space for it. It can be lonely. And it takes intentional, consistent work.

When employees feel they have to hide—parts of their identity, their concerns, or their ideas—trust breaks down. And that disconnection quietly erodes engagement, innovation, and retention.

To rebuild trust, leaders need to go first. That means:

  • Naming what’s not being said: Create space for honest, two-way dialogue—not just surveys or check-ins.
  • Modeling vulnerability: When leaders share a challenge or truth, they give others permission to do the same.
  • Valuing difference over sameness: Reward the voices that bring something new—not just the ones that echo the norm.

Trust isn’t a checkbox—it’s a culture. And it starts when people feel safe enough to be seen and ask for the support they need. It’s also a two-way street!

Christopher Migliaccio
Founder, Warren and Migliaccio LLP

Christopher Migliaccio

I’ve led a law firm through major transitions and understand how trust can make—or—break a professional environment.

Over the years, we’ve built a culture that emphasizes transparency and follow-through.

This is what my experiences have taught me:

One of the most effective ways to rebuild employee trust is to ensure that leadership models accountability.

When something goes wrong, owning the mistake publicly, rather than spinning it, can be more powerful than any team-building activity.

Equally important is the consistency between what leadership says and what it does.

Trust breaks when there’s a gap between messaging and action. It rebuilds when even the small promises are kept.

Finally, give employees a meaningful seat at the table—ask for their feedback, implement what you can, and explain transparently when you can’t.

David Goldstein
Founder, TeamBonding

David Goldstein

Drawing from decades of industry experience, I emphasize that involving employees in meaningful Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities offers profound benefits, especially in today’s uncertain economic climate.

These initiatives don’t just check a box, they foster a powerful sense of purpose and unity when employees work together towards a common cause.

For organizations, they are a way to demonstrate company values in action and a commitment to making a positive impact both for employees and the larger community.

CSR team-building events, like TeamBonding’s Do Good Bus or Charity Bike Build, are opportunities to boost engagement and create lasting, positive memories, transforming team building into genuinely impactful and fun experiences.

Elene Cafasso
President, Enerpace

Elene Cafasso

The number one way to build trust is to have a high “say/do ratio”. If you say it, announce it or promise it – do it!

Frequent changes in direction lose buy-in because they’re just the “flavor of the month”. Eventually, they’re ignored.

Authentic, frequent communication is the foundation of trust. Speak in conversational language, not PR soundbites.

Even if there’s something you can’t share yet, address the elephant in the room or any rumors. Let folks know when you will be able to share more, or why you can’t do so at this time.

Even if employees don’t like the message, they’ll appreciate your honesty.

Our reptilian brains get triggered when there’s a lack of control, certainty or fairness. Trust is extraordinarily difficult to rebuild if any of these are missing.

Use the Golden Rule and treat people like intelligent adults. It pays off!

Andrea Hayley-Sankaran
Owner, Lotuswood Organic Wellness Farm

Andrea Hayley-Sankaran

Rebuilding trust starts with listening—and really meaning it.

At Lotuswood Farm, we keep things small, intimate, and transparent. But even in a tight-knit team, trust can waver when people feel like their voice doesn’t matter. So I make it a point to ask questions without an agenda, to have open conversations where no one is punished for telling the truth.

I also believe leaders need to show more vulnerability. If you want people to trust you, you have to admit when you’re unsure or when you’ve made the wrong call. That builds emotional safety, and emotional safety builds trust.

When trust is present, people take initiative, offer ideas, and stick around for the long haul—not because they have to, but because they want to.

David Maffei
SVP & GM, Staffbase

David Maffei

Rebuilding trust in the workplace starts with strong, consistent communication, and middle managers are the unsung heroes who can make that happen.

As the most trusted source of information, with 57% of employees saying they trust their immediate supervisor “a great deal,” middle managers play a critical role in bridging leadership and frontline teams.

Organizations should provide these managers with timely, transparent updates and encourage two-way communication to further this sense of trust.

Staffbase’s data revealed that 88% of employees who feel well informed about changes also report being happy in their jobs, which ultimately contributes to employee retention and productivity.

Leveraging trusted tools like employee apps, ranked the top source of information by 60% of users, can also further enhance transparency and engagement.

When communication flows clearly and consistently, trust follows.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

The DEI Fade: Leaders Share Impacts of Pulling Back

by

The DEI Fade: Leaders Share Impacts of Pulling Back

As some organizations dial back their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs, the potential consequences for workplace dynamics, employee morale, and organizational success are coming into sharp focus.

Driven by financial pressures, shifting strategic priorities, or external influences, these reductions have ignited discussions about their broader implications.

We asked DEI experts, HR, and business leaders:

What are the possible outcomes of scaling back DEI initiatives?

Their responses highlight significant risks, including eroded trust, diminished innovation, talent attrition, and reputational challenges.

Yet, they also point to opportunities for organizations to reimagine DEI efforts with greater focus and sustainability.

In a world where authenticity and inclusivity are increasingly non-negotiable for employees and customers, these leaders underscore the importance of strategic, intentional approaches to preserve DEI progress.

Explore their expert insights below to uncover the risks, opportunities, and actionable strategies for navigating the complex terrain of DEI in today’s evolving workplaces.

Read on!

Ericka Prentice
Founder, mindfulnessmatters

Ericka Prentice

Let me begin by saying real change is never lasting if it’s based on the horror or sensation surrounding one event. The reasoning behind most of these initiatives was flawed at best and designed to alleviate white guilt.

Let’s be honest, backs were up against the wall after George Floyd because it was blatant and played in constant rotation. We’ve never had a problem with the killing of BIPOC people in this country. In fact, we’re a country that makes lynching postcards, burns a pregnant black woman, cuts her baby from her belly and stomps it to death. George Floyd was a routine lynching.

However, the world knew that Black America was not going to let this just go away and it was watching. The pressure was on and companies had to respond one way or the other.

DEI, the way most companies engaged with and implemented it felt performative at best. It did not and was not ever designed to address structural or systemic issues.

We have never been willing to have those conversations in America. We would rather maintain the comfort of particular groups than address the real needs of marginalized groups.

The companies that are stepping away were never committed to real change, only change that was going to keep them from losing money and their consumer base. They were never interested in doing the hard work or having the tough conversations or truly learning what it’s like to be a part of a marginalized group in this country or in their workplaces. They will say they were, but they lie, period.

This is why I do what I do. In my mind, teaching leaders how to incorporate mindfulness tools in their everyday lives is crucial.

When we teach leaders how to communicate mindfully, to understand aggressive language, how to listen and hold mindful meetings, we create leaders that are more inclusive, more compassionate and engage more meaningfully with their teams. In turn, their teams are more productive and experience genuine psychological safety.

We should’ve begun with mindfulness training prior to leaping into DEI initiatives. Mindfulness tools, and I’m talking beyond just breathwork and meditation, change lives, create better leaders and create better teams.

Dr. Laurie Cure
CEO, Innovative Connections

Dr. Laurie Cure

The current legal and regulatory landscape around DEI is certainly testing organizational agility and stamina. At the present time, I think companies are watching the legal volley around the issues and approaching it with caution, despite often believing and wanting to further the underlying intention of supporting greater representation, fairness and cultures of belonging.

In direct response to the question, organizations that have reduced their DEI initiatives have experienced pushback from consumers and employees alike. Sales, employee retention, reputation and supplier relationships have been negatively impacted by many of the companies that have aggressively moved away from DEI practices.

For organizations whose mission, vision and values are tightly aligned to inclusion, representation and fairness, DEI practices are more critical to them and their customer base. Eliminating or changing these practices has more significant implications.

DEI’s purpose is obviously threefold: ensure a workforce represented by individuals with various backgrounds, a focus on fairness with organizational practices, and creation of an environment where everyone feels respected, valued and empowered.

While underrepresented is often interpreted by race, it more often includes gender, individuals with disabilities, veterans and those who have served in our armed forces, as well as their spouses, LGBTQ, lower socioeconomic and/or educational backgrounds or certain age groups.

DEI is expansive and recognizes that human nature is flawed and biased and seeks to put structures in place that minimize those tendencies so everyone has a fair and equal opportunity. It is not designed to punish certain people who are more deserving or qualified than others, but rather, expand opportunities so everyone who is (or could be) qualified has an equal opportunity to be seen.

Tampering down on DEI practices risks stifling current and future talent and undermining a company’s own ability to compete and achieve higher levels of performance both individually and as organizations.

Ultimately, without focus and emphasis, we revert to old patterns of underrepresentation and we know that often leads to lower business performance. We also know from current research that most employees want diversity, equity and inclusion in their workplaces.

While there might be disagreement around specific practices, employees and leaders desire cultures that embrace diversity, fairness and belonging (call it what you will). Turnover, engagement, innovative thinking, and toxic workplace behavior, are all at risk with declining emphasis on these efforts.

I also think it is important that we continue to understand the difference between DEI and affirmative action. While there are some areas of overlap, most companies we work with (many who operate across the globe) are maintaining DEI efforts (although they might be calling them something different) and more closely examining affirmative action strategies, which often.

What is often more interesting to me is looking at those organizations that have elected not to move away from DEI practices.

They are staying within the law by eliminating quotas and race-based preferences, but they are maintaining (and growing) a commitment to language, DEI-specific programs, employee resource groups, inclusive hiring practices and benefits packages, and community engagement, which fosters diversity and inclusion.

Sahara Rose De Vore
Founder & CEO, The Travel Coach Network

Sahara Rose De Vore

Companies claim that company culture and wellbeing are part of their core values yet, scaling back on DEI programs speaks otherwise.

In order to promote a happier and healthier workplace, there needs to be diversity. To build compassion, empathy, acceptance, and understanding amongst coworkers, which in turn, boosts company culture, there needs to be diversity in cultures, abilities, genders, ages, etc.

This is because we are all different as human beings. Through interactions, conversations, and time spent with people who are different from yourself, your understanding and empathy for others builds.

Companies need good company culture to succeed. People need to feel understood, accepted, and trusted to perform well, to exercise their creative juices, and to be motivated.

Without a diverse workplace, employees will struggle to see new perspectives and lack care for team work, ultimately hurting the company itself.

Jamie Graceffa
HR Executive, Kind Cards

Jamie Graceffa

As DEI initiatives come under increasing scrutiny, HR professionals are being called to reimagine how we uphold psychological safety, build employee engagement, and nurture an inclusive culture—without compromising compliance or values. One powerful, unifying solution is kindness.

Kindness is not a soft skill—it’s a strategic one. It offers a human-centered bridge that helps preserve the essence of DEI, especially in climates where traditional approaches are being scaled back. Far from being politically charged, kindness strengthens trust, reduces conflict, and improves team dynamics. It reinforces inclusion and well-being while delivering measurable outcomes like stronger retention, improved performance, and a more meaningful employee experience.

Without DEI initiatives, the foundation of a healthy workplace culture begins to crack. Trust erodes, morale drops, and creativity is stifled. One-note thinking limits innovation, while unchecked bias opens the door to exclusion and toxicity. The consequences aren’t just cultural—they’re business-critical.

Intentional kindness in the workplace isn’t just a feel-good practice—it’s a catalyst for belonging, resilience, and long-term success.

Mark Sanchez
Founder, Tropic Residential

Mark Sanchez

We believe in fostering an inclusive environment where everyone feels welcome and represented—but we also believe the long-term success of any organization depends on a foundation of merit.

Scaling back DEI entirely risks alienating valuable voices, but overcorrecting can dilute the focus on performance and accountability.

The most sustainable approach is one that opens the door for everyone, then lets ability, work ethic, and results guide growth. Inclusion and merit don’t have to compete—they work best when they’re aligned.

Barbara Marzari
Communication & Engagement Strategy Director, Sociabble

Barbara Marzari

In the past few years, DEI programs have built more engaged, creative, and productive workplaces. So naturally, companies risk losing talent and weakening the morale and overall company performance if they pull back on DEI efforts.

From my experience helping entrepreneurs build their reputations, it is clear that inclusivity is a necessity today. If companies ignore DEI, they will surely see a decline in employee satisfaction, especially among underrepresented groups who feel that their voices are no longer being heard or valued. This could become costly both financially and in terms of brand equity.

Moreover, the young generation focuses on inclusivity and wishes their employer to do the same. So, scaling back DEI efforts could damage a company’s reputation in the eyes of potential hires as well. Once a company is seen as backward in DEI, it will struggle to attract top talent. This will become a bigger issue in creative industries where diversity brings innovation and performance.

DEI initiatives definitely demand effort and investment. However, such effort and investment are very small compared to the kind of reputation they build in the longer run. DEI builds a resilient and expanding company culture, and scaling it back would also pull back the progress companies have made.

So, how you decide to navigate through this as an organization is really going to matter.

Corina Tham
Finance & Sales Director, CheapForexVPS

Corina Tham

Reducing DEI efforts might influence the inclusiveness and equity within organizations. From my standpoint, particularly in fields like trading, varied viewpoints are essential for driving innovation and making sound decisions.

Pulling back on equity and inclusion could limit the diversity of ideas and hinder creativity in addressing challenges. Since trading relies heavily on examining different market trends and patterns, diverse teams are better positioned to tackle issues from various perspectives.

Businesses may also risk losing top talent who prioritize inclusive work cultures, which could impact overall outcomes. Furthermore, minimizing DEI initiatives might damage a company’s reputation, a key factor in client-focused industries like trading.

In my view, fostering diversity doesn’t just uplift individuals but also enhances the collective achievements of the team.

Ushmana Rai
Owner, TDEE Calculator

Ushmana Rai

Pulling back from DEI efforts may provide short-term relief or savings, but in the end, it is a retreat, not only in terms of culture but also competition.

Here’s how:

The Drain on Talent is Real: A large number of today’s workforce, especially the younger generations, look for an inclusive and equitable working environment. Any move that goes backward in DEI creates discontent among diverse talent and sends them out with the feeling that belongingness can be negotiated. This will gradually eat away at innovation and retention.

The Reputation is at Stake: Companies now that are letting DEI stand a step down may be branded as mostly performative. Today’s consumers and stakeholders are so values-led that silence and reversals do not go unnoticed.

Missed-Out Business Growth: A lot of studies have associated diverse teams with better decision-making and increased profits. It is not only a moral failure to scale back DEI but also a failed business strategy.

The Alternative? Refocus, Don’t Retreat: Instead of abandoning DEI, organizations should evolve it by integrating it into core strategies, leadership pipelines, and customer experience. That is the only way that true equity grows, quite, deep.

Karen Cosentino
Chief People Officer, Barge Design Solutions

Karen Cosentino

At Barge, our commitment to fostering an inclusive culture remains steadfast, independent of external policy changes.

We believe that diversity of thought, background, and experience drives innovation, strengthens our teams, and enhances the solutions we deliver. Rather than reacting to policy shifts, we remain focused on what has always been important to us—creating a workplace where all employees feel valued and empowered.

Candidates seek out companies that value inclusivity and professional growth. By focusing on the best talent for the role, we have seen steady increases in representation, particularly in areas where the AEC industry has historically had a higher percentage of men.

Employees are drawn to workplaces where they feel valued and have opportunities to connect. Our employee-led groups and professional development programs provide meaningful engagement beyond daily work, creating a stronger sense of community. We also believe that offering access to a variety of assignments generates an environment where innovation can prosper.

A culture of inclusion is built through daily actions, leadership commitment, and opportunities for connection. HR leadership serves as a resource to leadership and an advocate for employees, playing an important role in connecting all employees. Supporting the creation of employee-led groups or community-sponsored events builds connection and, subsequently, community.

Liam Perkins
Digital Marketing Manager, Privr

Liam Perkins

Scaling back DEI efforts isn’t just a step backward, it’s a full-blown trust fall with no one to catch marginalized employees. Let’s be real: DEI isn’t a “phase” you sunset after hitting a quota. When companies treat it like a trend, they signal that inclusion was performative, not foundational.

For brands like Privr, which exist to uplift LGBTQ+ communities, DEI isn’t optional, it’s the DNA. Gutting these initiatives risks alienating both talent and users who crave authenticity. Imagine a dating app that stops prioritizing queer safety features, trust evaporates overnight.

The anticipated outcome is a decline in creativity.

Homogeneous teams recycle ideas, while diverse teams spark innovation. Without intentional DEI, companies lose their edge in understanding nuanced markets, like Gen Z, who demand brands walk the inclusivity talk.

Plus, backsliding invites PR fires: employees and consumers will call out hypocrisy. Long-term, it’s a talent drain, marginalized folks flee environments where they’re an afterthought. DEI isn’t a cost center, it’s the ROI of relevance.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Retreating from DEI: What HR and Business Leaders Predict

by

Retreating from DEI: What HR and Business Leaders Predict

As some organizations scale back their Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in 2025, questions arise about the ripple effects on workplace culture, employee engagement, and business outcomes.

The decision to reduce DEI efforts—often driven by budget constraints, shifting priorities, or external pressures—has sparked debate about its long-term impact.

To explore this, we asked DEI experts, HR, and business leaders:

What are the possible outcomes of scaling back DEI initiatives?

Their insights reveal a range of consequences, from diminished employee trust and weakened innovation to potential talent loss and reputational risks.

They also highlight opportunities for organizations to refine DEI strategies to be more impactful and sustainable.

In an era where employees and consumers increasingly value authenticity and inclusion, these experts emphasize the need for thoughtful approaches to maintain progress.

Dive into their perspectives below to understand the risks, opportunities, and strategies for navigating the evolving landscape of DEI in today’s workplaces.

Read on!

Janet M. Stovall
Founder & Principal, Pragmatic Diversity Consultancy

Janet M. Stovall

First, politics is a big factor. We’re seeing more political pushback against DEI, with things like executive orders and laws trying to get rid of these programs. This has created a chilling effect, particularly following last year’s Supreme Court affirmative action decision.

Despite this political pressure, it’s important to note that many companies are not entirely abandoning DEI. A study by the Heritage Foundation (of all organizations) found that 485 of the Fortune 500 companies still actively promote D&I initiatives. This means that 97% of Fortune 500 companies haven’t canceled their DEI programs. And 86% of chief diversity officers expect budgets to remain steady or increase in 2025.

Second, there’s a lot of social tension. Different groups want totally opposite things when it comes to DEI. Some want more action, others call it “woke” and divisive. This puts companies in a tough spot and makes them careful about what they say publicly.

However, the reality is that many companies are simply evolving their programs or being less vocal about them. This approach, while understandable, presents its own set of challenges.

A disconnect between what an organization says (or doesn’t say) and what it does can lead to cognitive dissonance among employees, which erodes trust and engagement. Some organizations, it’s true, will walk away from DEI altogether. Often, these are the companies that didn’t truly see its value and were perhaps caught up in the 2020 surge of interest.

Third, there’s the legal piece. Even though legal changes can be slower, companies have to stay on top of the rules around DEI. Title VII is still in effect, and companies need to comply.

Looking ahead, I think we’ll see some interesting shifts. There may be fewer DEI programs overall, but the ones that remain are likely to be more effective. We’re already seeing surface-level solutions, like basic awareness training or simplistic actions that claim to “solve” this very complex issue, fall away.

What I believe will endure are objective, business-outcome focused approaches that are measurable and deliver tangible results.

Ultimately, companies that have been treating diversity as a real business asset, not just a marketing buzzword, will keep at the work. How they do it might change, but the commitment will stand.

Dr. Kamille Richardson
Founder, iSee Technologies

Dr. Kamille Richardson

When companies start pulling back on their DEI efforts, the ripple effects go way beyond just optics or PR. It can cause real problems.

Without a focus on inclusion, businesses miss out on the fresh perspectives that drive innovation and help tackle big challenges. And for employees with disabilities, the impact tends to hit even harder—fewer accommodations, less accessible tech, and not enough support to thrive and grow.

These gaps create barriers that hold talented people back, which leads to higher turnover, lower morale, and fewer future leaders in the pipeline.

The truth is, when DEI slips down the priority list, disabled professionals often feel it first. Accessibility starts to feel like an afterthought instead of something that’s baked into how the company operates day-to-day.

We’ve seen how remote work opened doors for many people with disabilities—but without clear, thoughtful policies, those flexible options can disappear, replaced by one-size-fits-all approaches that don’t work for everyone.

Even more concerning? Rolling back inclusion can reinforce outdated ideas about disability, turning necessary tools and support into things seen as “nice to have” instead of what they really are—smart, strategic investments in people.

It’s not just disabled employees who lose out, companies miss the chance to tap into the unique insights and problem-solving skills that come from people who’ve spent their lives navigating complex systems.

That kind of perspective is exactly what modern businesses need more of—not less.

Kevin Kaminski
CTA Certified Coach, Wise Owl Coaching LLC

Kevin Kaminski

Are organizations prepared to risk their competitive edge by scaling back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives?

Former US Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg explained an important business principle behind DEI when he said, “The opposite of diversity is uniformity. The opposite of equity is inequity. The opposite of inclusion is exclusion.” Few companies in competitive markets will thrive by staking their future on having a uniform, inequitable, and excluded workforce.

Consider the data: a 2023 McKinsey & Company study showed that companies with the most gender-diverse executive teams are 39% more likely to outperform their least-diverse peers, a rate that more than doubled in the last decade. When ethnic diversity on the executive team was examined, the most ethnically diverse were also 39% more likely to outperform the least diverse.

As a career-success coach, I’ve seen talented, high-performing individuals lose motivation and passion when their employer’s values conflict with their own. Misalignment in values often translates directly into employee turnover, reduced productivity, and lower morale.

Employees seek organizations with cultures that reflect their values. Most employees’ values include commitments to fairness, inclusion, and diversity. According to a 2020 Glassdoor study, 76% of job seekers think a diverse workforce is an important factor when evaluating companies and job offers.

Companies scaling back on DEI efforts risk consequences in attracting and retaining top talent. Eliminating DEI signals that diversity, fair treatment, and inclusion are not strategic priorities. When current and potential employees see that as a misalignment with their own values, it can trigger an exodus of talent and damage to the company’s reputation as a desirable employer.

Reducing DEI initiatives isn’t just ethically problematic, it’s strategically detrimental.

Companies with a diverse set of employees benefit from having the varied backgrounds, experiences, and skills from that diversity in their talent pool.

Limiting the diversity of employees by eliminating DEI efforts reduces their ability to innovate, adapt, and compete effectively. Companies willing to continue investing in diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplaces will reap financial, reputational, and operational advantages. Those that don’t will struggle in an increasingly complex global marketplace.

Silvia Angeloro
Executive Coach, Editor in Chief, Resume Mentor

Silvia Angeloro

What strikes me most is how quickly this can erode trust and morale among employees, especially those who’ve relied on these initiatives to build equitable spaces.

I’ve worked in environments where DEI efforts were deprioritized, and the immediate consequence was subtle yet significant. Employees of marginalized groups started disengaging, feeling as though their contributions mattered less.

I recall one instance where scaling down DEI programs led to unintended ripple effects. A once-thriving mentorship program for underrepresented employees was quietly discontinued.

Over time, I observed talented individuals leaving the organization, not because of performance issues but because they felt their professional growth and inclusion were no longer supported. It was a stark reminder of how such initiatives impact the broader culture.

Cutbacks may save resources in the short term, but the long-term result can be a loss of diversity, innovation, and employee loyalty. Organizations should tread carefully, finding ways to sustain DEI efforts, even in scaled-back forms, to maintain meaningful progress.

Leila Rao
Agile Coach, Author, & Business Strategist, Cultural Cartography

Leila Rao

Scaling back DEI is about more than budgets, qualifications, or even talent. DEI is a framework that strengthens how organizations operate.

When DEI is treated as a trend or a checkbox, it’s the first to go. But organizations that embed equity into how they listen, hire, lead, and adapt? They build sustainable trust, innovation, and resilience.

Pulling back may offer short-term relief, but long-term, it signals misalignment with the diverse realities of both workforce and market.

The outcome? Missed insight, eroded engagement, and a shrinking circle of relevance.

Yolanda Slan
Head of Human Resources, Televerde

Yolanda Slan

There is no question that the DEI brand has been politicized and used to divide people. As a result, many people don’t even understand what DEI is. I’ve had people genuinely surprised when I tell them that programs like maternity leave or second-chance hiring are DEI initiatives. That’s telling. This is not a failure of intention—it’s a failure of messaging.

But the mission isn’t going away. It’s evolving. Maybe it emerges under a different name, or perhaps we stop naming it altogether. But the best organizations will continue to invest in practices that reflect the spirit of diversity, equity, and inclusion because it’s the right thing to do and the smart thing to do. Customers will also continue to demand it and look to invest their dollars in companies that invest in people.

I hope to see more intentionality in this next chapter—fewer check-the-box initiatives, more meaningful efforts that produce measurable results, and more clarity about what DEI actually is: practical support for real people in all their differences and life experiences.

Leaders need to avoid activism in the workplace, meaning they should never be pushing personal agendas. However, they do need to be active—actively creating workplaces where people feel like they belong, are treated fairly, and have what they need to succeed.

Don’t get me wrong, it’s absolutely OK to bring personal experiences and perspectives into the workplace. We know that diverse viewpoints lead to better decisions. But, every program, initiative, and conversation must be grounded in the company’s values, aligned with its goals, and designed to make sure no employee feels excluded.

Kristen Boyle
Vice President of Marketing, HireRoad

Kristen Boyle

As some organizations begin to scale back their DEI initiatives, it’s important to recognize the very real business risks this decision may carry.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion aren’t just values—they’re proven drivers of performance.

Companies that deprioritize DEI may soon see the consequences reflected in their bottom line: declining customer engagement, weakened brand perception, and missed revenue opportunities.

That’s why it’s more important than ever to use data to reinforce the business case for DEI. By connecting people metrics to business outcomes—such as linking inclusive hiring practices to higher retention, or diverse leadership to stronger innovation—organizations can quantify the value DEI brings.

If companies choose to step back from DEI, they should at least equip themselves with the right data to understand what’s at stake.

With this evidence, they’ll not only be able to measure the impact of deprioritizing DEI—they’ll also be better positioned to justify bringing it back when the costs of inaction become clear.

Adam Posner
Founder & President, NHP Talent Group

Adam Posner

Based on my experience and the clients we have worked with, we have observed that scaling back DEI initiatives may offer short-term cost savings.

Still, it risks long-term consequences in culture, innovation, and talent attraction. Inclusive teams consistently outperform less diverse ones, and candidates, especially Gen Z, pay close attention to whether companies walk the talk.

Organizations that deprioritize DEI may struggle to build trust with employees and customers alike, while those that stay committed will be better positioned to foster resilience, creativity, and sustainable growth.

Michael Ang
CEO, JobElephant

Michael Ang

Our customers are in a tough spot. They’re committed to diversity, and were committed long before DEI became a common acronym. At the same time, they’re trying to stay out of hot legal water. Some of them are removing advertisements about diversity, or pausing their commitments to some diversity hiring events while they see how this plays out in courts. But they still view diversity as a necessity for filling jobs and something that results in a more successful business.

State laws can conflict with federal laws, making diversity even trickier to navigate right now. On the federal level, the Department of Education is cutting jobs, but that doesn’t mean each state’s education department is. Universities may be cutting some DEI programs, but that doesn’t mean they want to hire everyone who looks and thinks alike. In most cases, their desire to have a diverse student population and a diverse workforce remain, regardless of what’s happening in Washington.

The scaling back of DEI initiatives could fragment the recruitment landscape. As some organizations pause their DEI efforts while others increase them, this could create a divide among job boards. Those with a genuine commitment and a strong following may thrive, while those that are only DEI-in-name-only may struggle.

A lot of organizations change their recruitment advertising budgets mid-year, often July. Instead of just trying to give the appearance to the world that they care about DEI, which unfortunately may have been the case in the past with some organizations, now companies may tweak their budgets to prioritize recruitment channels that deliver measurable results, particularly for protected categories such as veterans and individuals with disabilities.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts

Navigating the AI Skills Gap: Practical Challenges and Solutions for Leaders

by

Navigating the AI Skills Gap: Practical Challenges and Solutions for Leaders

As AI and analytics reshape industries, organizations face the urgent task of equipping their workforce with the skills to thrive in this data-driven era.

However, upskilling employees in AI and analytics is not without its hurdles.

From overcoming resistance to change to addressing skill gaps and resource constraints, HR and business leaders must navigate a complex landscape to ensure successful adoption.

The HR Spotlight team asked top HR and business leaders:
What practical challenges should leaders prepare for when helping their workforce level up on AI and analytics skills?

Their insights highlight critical obstacles—such as fostering a learning culture, securing budget for training, and tailoring programs to diverse employee needs—while offering actionable strategies to overcome them.

In a world where AI proficiency is becoming a competitive necessity, these leaders emphasize the importance of strategic planning, clear communication, and inclusive approaches to empower employees.

Explore their expert advice on preparing for these challenges and building a future-ready workforce in 2025.

Read on!

Grace Savage
Brand & AI Specialist, Tradie Agency

Address Fear First: AI as Teammate, Not Threat

The fear of replacement is real, and it’s the #1 challenge I see when helping teams adopt AI.

The truth is, no tool works unless your people are on board. Right now, the most significant practical challenge across small and medium-sized enterprises isn’t the tool; it’s the trust. AI is moving faster than most employees can mentally process, and without the correct narrative from leadership, it quickly becomes a threat.

Here’s the framework we recommend leaders follow to close the fear gap and make AI adoption stick:

1. Hold the first conversation early and make it about value: Don’t wait for the tools to arrive before addressing the elephant in the room. From day one, tell your team, “We’re not replacing you; we’re upskilling you.” Let them know the great staff will always be valued. AI is here to remove repetitive tasks, not humans.

2. Reframe AI as a teammate, not a threat: We call AI a digital assistant, not a system. The language matters. When staff feel like AI is working with them – answering FAQs, handling follow-ups, drafting notes – they stop resisting it. Show them where it saves time, not where it replaces them.

3. Identify and invest in your early adopters: In every company, there’s someone who’s quietly curious. Support them. Train them first and then let them teach others. This builds internal momentum far better than top-down mandates or external consultants alone.

4. Make upskilling part of the culture: Create a culture where learning AI is a badge of honour, like becoming ‘fluent in digital’. You don’t need full technical literacy; you need familiarity and confidence. Normalize this by hosting 30-minute demos, walk-throughs, or mini-workshops

5. Check in often because fear doesn’t vanish, it evolves: Staff need reassurance during rollout, not just before. Create weekly check-ins, anonymous Q&A sessions, or pulse surveys to understand where the resistance lies. Trust builds with communication, not silence.

AI isn’t a threat to good people. It’s a multiplier for them.

My most practical advice is to build a narrative around value, not fear. Help people build an identity as someone who works well with AI. That’s what’s going to matter most in the next five years.

Vipul Mehta
Co-Founder & CTO, WeblineGlobal

Break Mindset Barriers for Successful AI Adoption

Expect resistance, even from smart teams.

One practical challenge is mindset—people often think AI and analytics are only for data scientists. Breaking that barrier means framing it as a tool, not a threat. Keep early use cases small, relevant, and quick to show value.

Another challenge is uneven learning curves. Some folks will sprint, others will drag. Avoid one-size-fits-all training. Pair fast adopters with slower ones, and use real business data so it feels connected to their daily work.

Also, leadership needs to walk the talk. If managers aren’t using the insights themselves, the team won’t either. The shift isn’t just tools—it’s how decisions are made, and that requires a culture shift more than a tech one.

Niclas Schlopsna
Managing Consultant and CEO, spectup

Meet Teams Where They Are, Not Where Expected

One of the first things I’d flag is the false sense of urgency that often creeps in—leaders feeling like they need to upskill their teams overnight.

That creates chaos.

I’ve seen companies invest in flashy AI courses without checking if anyone even has the baseline data literacy to understand what’s being taught. You’ve got to meet your team where they are, not where you wish they were.

At spectup, when we guide clients through AI readiness, we start by mapping out existing capabilities and aligning those with the business use cases that actually matter, not just the trendiest ones.

Another big challenge is the “fear factor.” People worry that AI will make them irrelevant, which leads to resistance or shallow engagement. I remember a session with a startup we were advising—everyone nodded through the AI onboarding, but no one actually used the tools after.

It wasn’t until we framed the tech as a support, not a replacement, and tied it to specific outcomes—like saving hours on reporting or refining investor insights—that people bought in.

Also, don’t underestimate how long it takes to operationalize what’s learned. You’re not just teaching tools—you’re reshaping workflows, KPIs, even mindsets. Make room for experimentation, and allow failure without penalty.

One of our clients only saw traction after they created internal “AI champions” to guide peers and offer real-world examples from their own work. That human layer made all the difference.

Vikrant Bhalodia
Head of Marketing & People Ops, WeblineIndia

Solve Today’s Problems to Overcome AI Adoption Fear

One of the biggest challenges we ran into was fear, not just fear of being replaced by AI, but fear of looking behind. No one admits it, but it shows up when people avoid trying new tools or stay quiet in sessions.

We shifted our approach. Instead of framing AI and analytics as “the future,” we made it about solving today’s problems. We ran short internal challenges, things like using AI to draft reports or prep for client calls. Once people saw how it saved time and effort, engagement went up.

We also realized that a one-time training wasn’t enough. So, we added five-minute mini-learnings to regular team meetings. We’d highlight something a teammate tried that week. It kept the momentum going without making it feel like extra work.

If I had to sum it up: address the emotional barrier first. Then connect the learning to something real. That’s when adoption starts to stick.

Derek Pankaew
CEO & Founder, Listening.com

AI Creates Identity Crisis, Not Just Skill Gaps

As a founder with a team that’s integrating more AI tools by the week, one challenge I’d flag for other leaders isn’t technical—it’s psychological.

The biggest hurdle?

The silent shame that creeps in when smart, capable employees feel like they’re suddenly behind. AI doesn’t just introduce new tools—it messes with people’s sense of competence.

You’re asking a mid-level analyst, who used to feel sharp and on top of their game, to admit they don’t understand a tool that a fresh grad just automated a dashboard with.

That’s not a technical gap. That’s an identity crisis. And nobody wants to talk about it.

If you want people to level up on AI and analytics, you can’t just throw them into a Notion doc of prompts and tutorials.

You have to actively defuse the ego threat. Normalize being clueless.

Create “sandbox hours” where teams can experiment without deliverables or pressure to be efficient. Celebrate learning curves, not just output. Otherwise, you’ll see people resist the tools they think are replacing them—because deep down, they’re mourning a version of themselves that used to feel valuable.

That’s the real work of leadership here. Not training people on GPT or Python—but helping them rewrite what “being good at your job” means in this new era.

Justin Belmont
Founder & CEO, Prose

Create Safe Spaces to Bridge AI Confidence Gap

The biggest curveball? The confidence gap.

Most employees aren’t resisting AI—they’re afraid of looking dumb.

The practical challenge is creating low-stakes learning environments where people can tinker, fail, and ask “obvious” questions without fear.

Gamified training, peer-led sessions, even AI mentors can help.

Upskilling isn’t just technical—it’s emotional. If you don’t manage that, your tools will outrun your team.

Edward Tian
CEO, GPTZero

Plan Training Around Those Who Need Most Help

Understand that not all of your workers are going to be able to adopt new AI and tech-related skills as quickly or easily.

This is especially true for cross-generational workforces.

It’s going to probably be a lot more common for Baby Boomer and Gen X workers to struggle more with learning these skills that it will be for Millennials and Gen Zers. So, you want to prepare for that.

Plan your training around those who you know will need the most help and require the most time.

Michelle Garrison
Event Tech and AI Strategist, We & Goliath

Assign Platform Ambassadors to Solve Tool Fragmentation

Tool fragmentation during content deployment feels exactly like trying to coordinate a hybrid event across six different platforms while your speakers are scattered across three time zones.

I think the real issue isn’t that teams need more integrated software—it’s that they’re trying to force editorial workflows into project management boxes that weren’t designed for creative iteration.

For our part, we discovered that video production actually flows more smoothly when we accept tool diversity instead of fighting it. We use Frame.io for visual feedback, Slack for quick decisions, and Notion for documentation, but we assign specific team members as “platform ambassadors” who translate information between systems.

The pain point isn’t multiple tools—it’s the cognitive overhead of context-switching without designated translators. Most editorial teams could solve 70% of their coordination problems by having one person whose job is simply moving information between platforms rather than trying to find the mythical “one tool that does everything.”

Josiah Roche
Fractional CMO, JRR Marketing

Rethink Workflows Before Adding AI Tools

One of the biggest challenges is getting people to unlearn outdated thinking. There’s a lot of excitement around learning prompt engineering or building dashboards, but not enough willingness to question whether current workflows still make sense.

So AI isn’t just a new layer of tools. It requires rethinking how decisions are made, how data flows through the business, and how fast teams can move. Without that shift, most AI efforts end up reinforcing broken systems instead of improving them.

Another challenge is emotional. When people hear “AI,” many worry it’s going to replace them. That fear can slow adoption more than any technical hurdle.

So the mindset shift is moving from doing the task to directing the system. It’s about becoming someone who uses machines to scale judgment, not just output. Some people adapt quickly. Others need time, examples, and a clear reason to change. Because of that, culture and incentives matter more than any training program.

Tool overload is also common. It’s tempting to roll out every trending platform like Power BI, ChatGPT, or Looker and expect productivity to follow. But more tools usually create more confusion. So what works better is starting with one narrow use case that clearly saves time or reduces cost. When people see impact, they start asking for more. That’s how adoption grows—when the value is obvious.

Accuracy gets over-prioritized. AI and analytics are probabilistic by nature. So if the bar is perfection, no one will take risks.

Teams need permission to test, learn, and adjust quickly. The advantage isn’t in getting everything right the first time. It’s in how fast feedback loops close and how quickly insights turn into action. That’s what makes AI useful at scale.

Robbin Schuchmann
Co-founder, EOR Overview

Connect Global AI Training to Business Outcomes

When helping a workforce level up on AI and analytics skills, I would say the biggest challenge is managing the diversity in learning curves and cultural expectations across global teams.

In international hiring, you encounter people with very different backgrounds and access to technology, so training programs must be designed to accommodate varying levels of familiarity with AI tools and data literacy. This requires a flexible, inclusive approach that respects local contexts while maintaining a consistent skill baseline.

I also emphasize the importance of aligning AI and analytics skill development with clear business outcomes. Upskilling efforts often fail when they’re too theoretical or disconnected from daily work.

For global teams, this means crafting training that directly supports the roles employees perform, making the learning immediately relevant and actionable. This practical connection helps maintain engagement and accelerates adoption of new technologies.

The HR Spotlight team thanks these industry leaders for offering their expertise and experience and sharing these insights.

Do you wish to contribute to the next HR Spotlight article? Or is there an insight or idea you’d like to share with readers across the globe?

Write to us at connect@HRSpotlight.com, and our team will help you share your insights.

Recent Posts